r/Everything_QA

I Tried ChatGPT to Fix My Resume. Here’s Why It Missed the Point.
▲ 98 r/Everything_QA+103 crossposts

I Tried ChatGPT to Fix My Resume. Here’s Why It Missed the Point.

Comparing https://resume.zoevera.com against https://chatgpt.com

And what a purpose-built ATS checker caught that GPT-4 didn’t.

Let me be upfront: I use ChatGPT for everything. Code reviews, draft emails, explaining stack traces at 2am. It’s genuinely useful. So when I needed to tailor my resume for a senior backend role, my first instinct was to open a chat window.

That was three weeks ago. Here’s what I learned.

What ChatGPT actually does well

Ask ChatGPT to “improve my resume” and it will:

  • Clean up passive voice (“responsible for” → “led”)
  • Suggest stronger action verbs
  • Add structure and formatting consistency
  • Rewrite vague bullets into something that sounds more impressive

For general writing quality, it’s genuinely good. If your resume reads like it was written by someone who hasn’t slept in 48 hours, ChatGPT will fix that.

What ChatGPT fundamentally cannot do

Here’s the problem: ChatGPT doesn’t know what job you’re applying for.

You can paste the job description into the prompt, sure. But there’s no mechanism for it to:

  1. Score your resume against that specific JD — it has no concept of a match percentage
  2. Identify which keywords are present vs. missing — it will suggest improvements but won’t systematically audit keyword coverage
  3. Know how Applicant Tracking Systems parse text — it will rewrite content without knowing whether an ATS will ever see it

ATS filters work on keyword frequency and placement. A resume that reads beautifully to a human can score 40% on an ATS if the right terms aren’t in the right sections. ChatGPT optimizes for human readers. ATS systems are not human readers.

I ran a test. Same resume, same job description (Backend Engineer, Node.js/AWS stack). I gave ChatGPT the full JD and asked it to optimize my resume for ATS.

The output was well-written. It added “microservices” and “REST APIs” in a few places. But it missed:

  • “AWS Lambda” — mentioned 4 times in the JD, absent from my resume after the rewrite
  • “CI/CD pipeline” — appeared in the required skills section, never added
  • The Projects section — ChatGPT rewrote my experience bullets but left the Projects section untouched, which is where most of my relevant backend work lived

When I ran the same resume through resume.zoevera.com, it flagged all three gaps explicitly, with section-level attribution. The ATS match score went from 54% to 81% after applying the suggested changes.

The core difference: diagnostic vs. generative

ChatGPT is a generative tool. It produces new text. It’s very good at that.

An ATS checker is a diagnostic tool first. It measures the gap between your resume and a specific job description, then tells you exactly what’s missing. The rewrite comes second — and it’s grounded in what was actually identified as absent, not what the model thinks sounds better.

This distinction matters because:

ChatGPT hallucinates improvements. It will add metrics you never achieved (“improved system performance by 35%”), use terminology that
sounds right but wasn’t in the JD, and rewrite bullets that didn’t need rewriting while leaving critical gaps untouched. Every line needsfact-checking.

A purpose-built tool works from the actual gap. The keywords it adds are the ones the JD asked for. The sections it flags are the ones the ATS will score. The output is closer to submission-ready.

A practical workflow

These tools aren’t mutually exclusive. The best result I got came from using both in sequence:

  1. ATS checker first: identify the keyword gaps and get a scored rewrite that closes them
  2. ChatGPT second: use it to polish tone, tighten sentences, and clean up anything that sounds mechanical

The ATS checker handles precision. ChatGPT handles prose quality. Neither does both well alone.

The cost argument

ChatGPT Plus is $20/month. If you’re actively job searching, that’s a fixed overhead whether you use it or not.

Most people search for jobs in windows — a few weeks of active applications, then nothing for months. A per-session model makes more
sense: pay when you need it, nothing when you don’t. ZoeVera’s pricing works that way — free analysis, one-time payment for the full
rewrite, no subscription.

For a developer audience specifically: if you’re applying to 10–15 roles over two weeks, you’re not optimizing resumes 365 days a year. The math on a monthly subscription doesn’t work.

What I’d actually recommend

  • If you just need better writing: ChatGPT is fine and you already have it
  • If you’re applying to roles where ATS filtering is real (any company using Workday, Greenhouse, Lever, iCIMS): use a dedicated ATS checker first, then polish with ChatGPT
  • If you’re a developer and haven’t thought about this: your resume probably uses technical jargon that means something to you and nothing to an ATS keyword parser. “Built scalable backend” is not the same as “developed microservices architecture using Node.js and AWS ambda” — even if the underlying work is identical

The ATS doesn’t know what you meant. It only knows what you wrote.

Tested against a real Backend Engineer job description. Tools used: ChatGPT GPT-4o, https://resume.zoevera.com. June 2026.

u/Enough_Charge2845 — 2 days ago
▲ 5 r/Everything_QA+1 crossposts

Looking for advice on starting QA Automation

Hi everyone!
I’ve been working in QA for about 5 months. So far, I have experience with Manual Testing and API Testing using Postman, but I have zero experience in Automation.

I’d like to start learning Test Automation, and I’m currently considering Playwright.

What would you recommend for someone starting from zero in Automation? I don’t mind if the resource is free or paid — my main priority is finding something that gives me a strong foundation and teaches things properly, rather than just following tutorials without understanding.

Also, what do you think about the freeCodeCamp course “Software Testing Course – Playwright, E2E, and AI Agents”? Is it good for a complete beginner in Automation, or would you recommend starting with something else?

I’d also really appreciate hearing about your own experience:
How did you start learning Automation?
What was the best resource/course you used?
Is there anything you wish you had learned earlier?

Thanks in advance!

reddit.com
u/Norah-xoxo — 1 day ago

Hottest "AI Certification" that a tester can get right now

Any ideas or Suggestions on AI certifications for a software tester? ISTQB has gen AI certification. Any other recognized certifications? Let's share...

reddit.com
u/djangoBMB — 3 days ago
▲ 126 r/Everything_QA+5 crossposts

A QA agent walking my React Native app and writing the Maestro flows

Proof of concept, a Claude Code plugin for now. Maestro does the driving underneath.

One command and it walks the app on the simulator and draws the whole map — every screen, how you reach it, what's on it. Then it turns that map into subflows that are ready to run as tests. When the code changes, it updates the affected cases itself.

It never touches the app's codebase. Everything it produces is plain files sitting in the repo.

Does this look useful, or am I solving something you don't have?

u/TallPresent6858 — 4 days ago
▲ 32 r/Everything_QA+1 crossposts

Is AI-assisted manual QA more common than I think? (using Claude to run test plans/execution)

8+ years in QA (product → Shopify agency → back to product), now at an AI startup. Curious if my current workflow is normal or if I got lucky with tooling.

The old way, for years:

  1. Receive reqs
  2. Write test plan/test cases
  3. Manually test
  4. Log bugs

Depending on the feature, this could eat hours, days, sometimes weeks.

How I work now:

  1. Drop the feature into Claude
  2. Have it generate the test cases/test plan
  3. Have it actually run the tests on the PR or staging
  4. I manually cover whatever it couldn't (rare)
  5. Claude leaves feedback/pass notes and updates my test run

A feature that used to take days can now get through in a few hours, even when it's pretty complex.

So — is this just a quirk of working at an AI-native company, or is this becoming the norm in QA now? Would love to hear how manual QA folks elsewhere are (or aren't) using AI in their day-to-day.

reddit.com
u/yoursweetdesire17 — 7 days ago

Any simple AI tool for software testing?

Writing test cases manually takes a lot of time, especially when we are working on different features. Is there any simple AI tool that can create test cases from requirements or screenshots, manage testing progress and also help track bugs in one place?

It would be better if the tool supports both manual and automated testing. Please suggest a good option.

reddit.com
u/OwlZealousideal4779 — 8 days ago
▲ 31 r/Everything_QA+1 crossposts

Is dedicated QA still a real career here or am I chasing something that's disappearing?

Bit of context. I spent 3.5 years testing billing and tax platforms, one for a US utility and one for a tax form validation tool in Poland. Functional, mobile, API, some automation. Finished a Master of IT in Australia this year and I'm now job hunting in Melbourne.

The job ads are telling me almost nothing useful. Half of them want a "Quality Engineer" who is really a developer, half want a test analyst with eight years in one specific domain, and the rest read like they were written by someone who has never met a tester.

4 things I'd like a reality check on from people actually working here:

  1. Is a dedicated QA role still a real thing, or are teams increasingly pushing testing onto developers alongside their own work? I keep hearing both and I can't tell which one is the market and which one is LinkedIn noise.
  2. Does 3.5 years read as mid-level to hiring teams here, or does overseas experience get discounted enough that I'm effectively starting again? Someone in the industry told me directly not to bother with grad roles, but I'd like to know if that's the general view.
  3. When a team does interview for a pure QA role now, what is it actually testing? Live coding, framework design questions, or more scenario based?
  4. Also curious about the AI thing. I've been told the differentiator right now is being able to show where you've used AI to solve real testing problems, not just "familiar with AI tools". If that's true, what does that actually look like in your work? Genuinely asking, because I'd rather build the skill properly than bolt a buzzword onto my resume.

Happy to hear anything, including that I'm asking the wrong questions.

reddit.com
u/MURALIGMD — 10 days ago
▲ 3 r/Everything_QA+2 crossposts

Visually interact with your QA knowledge-graph

I’ve been thinking about a problem with QA tooling: we have tons of information, but most of it is presented as lists.

Stories → scenarios → tests → executions → issues.

You can search it. Filter it. Sort it.

But it’s surprisingly hard to see the relationships and patterns across all of it.

So we built something called Semantic Canvas.

Every Story, Scenario, Test, Issue, API - map into a shared embedding space, then projected onto a 2D canvas.

Similar things naturally cluster together - even when there’s no explicit link between them.

Then, you can overlay things like execution status, severity, automation coverage, or overdue status as "border colours" on nodes, to reveal patterns that are hard to spot in a list.

For example:

🐞 See high-severity bug hotspots
🧪 Find clusters of failing tests
📉 Spot product areas with poor automation coverage
🔍 Identify duplicate tests

The goal is pretty simple: make your QA knowledge something you can explore, not just search.

Would you find a view like this useful for your QA data?

u/MoneyMediocre4791 — 7 days ago
▲ 2 r/Everything_QA+2 crossposts

Built a CLI that watches your app run and writes a real Playwright tests

I kept hitting the same annoying loop while building features: change some code, manually click through the flow to check it still works, repeat. No test exists yet because the

  feature isn't done — so I just... kept doing it by hand.

  So I built five46 — you give it a plain-English goal like "log in and confirm the dashboard loads", point it at your local app, and it uses your own LLM key

  (OpenAI/Anthropic/Gemini/Groq/Bedrock) to actually drive a real Chromium browser (or hit real HTTP endpoints for APIs), one action at a time, and tells you honestly whether it worked

  — with a root-cause guess if it didn't.

  The part I'm most happy with: once a run succeeds, it writes out a real, standalone .spec.ts (Playwright) or .test.mjs (node:test) file. That file has zero dependency on five46 or the

   LLM afterward — it's just a normal test you commit and run in CI with npx playwright test. So the same check that helped you while you were building the feature becomes your

  permanent regression test, instead of a separate thing you write later.

  Other bits:

  - Fully local, no cloud sandbox — the only thing that leaves your machine is the text sent to your LLM provider per step (always shown, never hidden)

  - Session reuse so you're not paying LLM cost to log in on every run

  - Self-healing selectors (one bounded retry if a selector goes stale)

  - --repeat N to catch flaky steps

  - MCP server so Claude Code/Cursor can call it as a tool directly

  It's an early proof of concept — works, but rough edges. Genuinely want feedback on whether the "test-while-you-build becomes your regression suite" idea is useful to anyone else, or

  if I'm solving a problem only I have.

  GitHub: https://github.com/sekharsdet/five46

  npm: npm install -g five46

u/onlycricket546 — 9 days ago
▲ 0 r/Everything_QA+1 crossposts

Need a reality check on software testing field

Is it really possible to land at least a 5lpa job as a fresher in the software testing field in accordance with the current market situation and the impact of artificial intelligence making it difficult to catch up to the expectations of recruiters

reddit.com
u/hellotomo- — 8 days ago
▲ 7 r/Everything_QA+4 crossposts

Looking for Manual Testing Opportunities | 3.7 YOE | Immediate Joiner

I’m currently looking for Manual QA / Software Testing opportunities. I have 3.7 years of experience in software testing and am based in Bengaluru. I’m an immediate joiner and open to relevant opportunities in Bengaluru or remote roles.

If anyone knows of openings, referrals, hiring managers, or companies currently hiring Manual QA/Test Engineers, I would really appreciate your help. Any leads or suggestions are welcome.

reddit.com
u/Slave_of_The_One — 9 days ago
▲ 3 r/Everything_QA+1 crossposts

AI for backend testing

Hello community, is there anyone using AI for software backend testing. If yes then please explain the how's and when and tools to be used and type of project or features applicable for this AI.

For front-end or UI based application, AI has huge potential but for backend i haven't seen any tutorials guides or posts in the internet or people from my network.

If someone has good idea on this please let me know.

reddit.com
u/alupandu — 8 days ago
▲ 3 r/Everything_QA+1 crossposts

Everyone is NOT Responsible for Quality

James Bach writes about who is responsible for software quality. Excerpt: "In opposition to my idea that software testing should be a role, and not just a task, I am sometimes told that True Agile does not permit this. Why? Because, in Agile, “quality is everyone’s responsibility.” This statement is sometimes issued as if it were a moral truism that is beyond argument. Or sometimes as a moral achievement that is unique to Agilists, as if it had never occurred to earlier generations of software developers to help each other build nice things. Either way, it doesn’t make sense to me. The first response that comes to my mind is “I’m talking about testing, not quality. Why are you dragging quality into this?” Testers do not assure quality. Testers CANNOT assure quality. Testers do not now and never have “owned quality” in any way."

But even if we set that aside, quality should not be considered “everyone’s responsibility.”

satisfice.com
u/martinig — 9 days ago
▲ 2 r/Everything_QA+1 crossposts

[HIRING] QA/Test Manager – 12-Month Contract – Austin, TX – Onsite

I’m recruiting for a senior QA/Test Manager to lead quality assurance for a large-scale EHR SaaS implementation.

Contract details:

  • September 3, 2026–August 31, 2027
  • Up to 2,000 hours
  • Austin, Texas
  • Onsite Monday–Friday
  • Candidates must already reside in Texas and be able to work onsite
  • Client name is confidential at this stage

Key requirements:

  • 11+ years in QA/Test Lead or Test Manager roles
  • Strong EHR or healthcare SaaS testing experience
  • Data migration, ETL testing, reconciliation and data validation
  • Functional, integration, regression and user acceptance testing
  • Experience testing clinical, scheduling, medication, documentation and billing workflows
  • Test plans, traceability matrices, defect management and test evidence
  • Azure DevOps, ALM or Jira
  • Experience coordinating vendors and multidisciplinary teams

Experience with HL7, FHIR, HIPAA or public-sector healthcare systems would be especially helpful.

If you’re interested, send me a message with your résumé or LinkedIn profile and a brief overview of your EHR and data-migration testing experience.

Joanna@MaridenSearch.com

reddit.com
u/Extension_Algae6162 — 8 days ago
▲ 19 r/Everything_QA+3 crossposts

Hiring QA Engineer Intern (Trainee)

Company: Comply Ark

Mode: Remote

Duration: 3 Months

Stipend: 5k-7k/month

Please upvote and comment interested to get the apply link

reddit.com
u/Puzzleheaded-Top11 — 13 days ago

Software Testing and AI

Just read about a man from Australia using an OpenClaw AI Agent to book a gym reservation and the end result was a booking, but, at the expense of another gym member losing their reservation!

Most of the comments that I have read online have been towards the thinking of 'Bad AI'. I think that this is a result of a software defect in the gym club's membership booking program, no matter if a bot did it, if the person themselves found the flaw, or the front desk clerk.

My recommendation is to understand how (if) your organization is doing any testing with AI Agents, and if not, suggest that they start (note, this does not mean testing the AI artifacts that your company is developing, but, using AI to test your core products). As evident by the leaps forward AI is making, we as Quality Assurance Professionals can and should find ways to harness this and gain some productivity.

reddit.com
u/BuuBird — 8 days ago

People asked how I link tests to tickets — I just put both in the repo as files

A lot of the comments on my post Managing test cases as YAML files inside Git were about traceability. fair. “Test cases in YAML is cute, but how do you link them to tickets?”

So I decided to put the tickets in the repo as YAML too — and it works great for me. I’ve been working on an app called Gitoza anyway: a desktop tool to manage test cases and test runs as YAML, and use git to sync with the team. Adding tickets the same way was the natural next step.

Same idea as test cases: plain files in git. Tickets, releases, test cases, test runs — all local. Once they’re files next to each other, linking feels like jumping between notes in Obsidian. No export dance, no three SaaS tabs hoping the IDs match.

That’s what Gitoza is for: browse and edit locally on that YAML-in-git layout. I use it across a Mac mini and a Windows laptop.

It’s a local desktop app, same idea as Obsidian: your data is files on disk, not a hosted SaaS. Free for personal use; if a company wants to use it, there’d be a commercial license. No lock-in either way — everything is still just YAML in git.

Curious what people think — would tickets next to test cases in the repo work for you, or is that a hard no?

https://gitoza.com

u/Alternative-Try7044 — 9 days ago

Hiring QA Engineer (1-2 yr Exp)

QA Engineer – Manual & Automation Testing

Experience: 1–2 Years
Location: Bangalore / Remote
Employment: Full-time/Freelancer

We are looking for a QA Engineer with 1–2 years of experience to join our engineering team and work on a modern e-commerce platform and mobile application.

The role will involve owning quality across web applications, APIs, and mobile experiences, with a strong focus on functional testing, automation, and real-world user experience.

What You'll Do

  • Perform manual and functional testing of web applications and APIs.
  • Design and execute test cases, test scenarios, regression and smoke test suites.
  • Identify, document, track, and verify bugs through their lifecycle.
  • Perform API testing and validate backend services and integrations.
  • Build and maintain automation test cases for critical application workflows.
  • Conduct regression testing for new releases and feature updates.
  • Work closely with developers, designers, and product teams to identify issues early.
  • Validate application performance, usability, responsiveness, and cross-browser compatibility.
  • Participate in release testing and provide QA sign-off.
  • Help improve QA processes, test coverage, and automation practices.

Requirements

  • 1–2 years of experience in software QA/testing.
  • Strong understanding of manual testing methodologies.
  • Hands-on experience with automation testing.
  • Good understanding of API testing and tools such as Postman.
  • Experience writing clear and structured test cases.
  • Good understanding of SDLC, STLC, bug lifecycle, regression testing, and test planning.
  • Basic understanding of databases and SQL.
  • Familiarity with Git and modern software development workflows.
  • Strong attention to detail and a mindset for finding edge cases.

Good to Have

  • Experience testing React Native / Android / iOS mobile applications.
  • Experience with tools such as Appium, Playwright, Cypress, or Selenium.
  • Experience with e-commerce applications, Shopify, payments, orders, inventory, or customer-facing applications.
  • Familiarity with CI/CD-based automated testing.
  • Basic understanding of performance and security testing.

What We're Looking For

Someone who doesn't just verify whether a feature works, but asks:

"What could go wrong?"

You should be comfortable exploring edge cases, breaking workflows, reproducing difficult bugs, and thinking from the perspective of a real customer.

You'll work closely with the engineering team on a product where quality, reliability, and mobile app performance are key priorities.

Apply if you're excited about building and testing products used by real customers and want exposure to modern web, API, mobile, and automation testing.

reddit.com
u/jpankaj5555 — 11 days ago

10 months into QA and seriously questioning whether I want to continue in this career

​

I'm a 10-month-experience QA working as the only QA in a fintech startup, currently responsible for 3 loan apps and 2 aggregator platforms.

I know I'm not an excellent tester yet. I struggle with structure, memory, domain knowledge and sometimes thinking of edge cases. I'm working on those things.

But I'm struggling with the environment too. Testing is often expected to be completed in 2–4 hours, while I'm also expected to maintain the QA process, report bugs, track fixes, and ensure coverage. Requirements aren't always clear, but when I ask questions, I'm sometimes told to figure it out from competitor products. At the same time, I'm discouraged from spending too much time with developers because apparently I'm “wasting their time.”

I've been told QA is basically on its own. I was also told by someone from product that “you have to decide how many balls you can dodge.” That really made me realize that I'm not sure I want to work this way long-term.

I understand that 100% bug-free software is impossible and edge cases will always exist. I'm not expecting perfection. What I want is clear expectations, reasonable time to test, and enough collaboration to understand the product and make good decisions.

I'm not trying to blame everything on management — I genuinely have a lot to improve as a tester. But after weeks of feeling constantly scrutinized and struggling to keep up, my confidence is getting drained and I'm seriously considering an alternate career path.

For experienced QAs: is this normal startup/QA reality, or am I in an unhealthy setup? And if you've been in a similar situation, did changing companies change your experience of QA?

reddit.com
u/VoiceOk6583 — 11 days ago
▲ 2 r/Everything_QA+1 crossposts

Test Data Ideas

Hi everyone,
I'm looking for ideas and experiences around creating realistic test data for a new Case Story feature.
Case Story provides a chronological view of everything that has happened on a case and across its related case hierarchy. Rather than users navigating to multiple areas of the application, it brings together events such as documents, tasks, contacts, emails, notes, comments, status changes, and other key activities into a single timeline to help users quickly understand the history and progression of a case.
The challenge isn't just generating large volumes of data. We need data that reflects how cases evolve over time, including realistic sequences of events, updates, and changes, so the timeline feels representative of real customer usage.
A few questions:
Have you used APIs, automation, SQL scripts, or other approaches to generate large volumes of realistic test data?
How have you simulated historical data and record changes over time rather than just creating static datasets?
Are there any tools, frameworks, or utilities you'd recommend for creating varied, timeline-based test data?
For performance testing, have you found volume, variety, or historical depth to be the biggest factor?
Our current focus is on creating realistic case hierarchies with a good mix of documents, tasks, contacts, emails, notes, status changes, and other events occurring over weeks, months, or years. We suspect that the quality, variety, and history of the data may be more important than pure volume alone.
Would love to hear how others have approached similar challenges and any lessons learned. Thanks in advance!

reddit.com
u/unknownuser_91 — 11 days ago