r/GhostCandle

Image 1 — 7 charts that explain trends in trading better than any course I paid for.
Image 2 — 7 charts that explain trends in trading better than any course I paid for.
Image 3 — 7 charts that explain trends in trading better than any course I paid for.
Image 4 — 7 charts that explain trends in trading better than any course I paid for.
Image 5 — 7 charts that explain trends in trading better than any course I paid for.
Image 6 — 7 charts that explain trends in trading better than any course I paid for.
Image 7 — 7 charts that explain trends in trading better than any course I paid for.
Image 8 — 7 charts that explain trends in trading better than any course I paid for.

7 charts that explain trends in trading better than any course I paid for.

Spent way too long overcomplicating trends. Pulled the 7 ideas that actually matter from Martin Pring and turned each into one chart. Swipe through, full text below.

1. Many trends push on price at the same time. The jagged line is the actual price; the faded arrow is the big (primary) trend underneath it all.

2. Three trends matter most. Same market, three zoom levels - longest at top, shortest at bottom.

3. Shorter timeframe = noisier, less reliable. Trust a monthly signal far more than a 1-minute one.

4. The very long-term (secular) trend decides which moves are bigger. In a secular up-phase, bull legs dominate; in a down-phase, bear legs dominate.

5. Peak-and-trough is the foundation. The whole staircase idea - higher highs, higher lows - that everything else builds on.

6. A real pullback gives back ⅓ to ⅔ of the prior move (by price). Shallower than that and the turn is suspect.

7. Sideways chop counts too (by time). A flat consolidation lasting ⅓ to ⅔ of the prior rally's time is a valid correction, even if price barely drops.

Which one would've saved you the most money if you'd known it earlier? Mine's #6.

u/SadNose6889 — 10 days ago

Someone's calling BTC 40-50k by October. Right call, or another confident roadmap the market ignores?

Saw a full bear breakdown this week from one of the bigger short-side accounts and figured it's worth chewing on here - the thinking is more interesting than the price target.

The short version of his thesis:

  • Short since 120k, added more around 80.5k, with orders still waiting at 83-85k
  • We're in "stage 4" of his framework - the boring, sideways, everyone's-exhausted phase right before real capitulation
  • The actual panic only kicks in if we lose 60k
  • Final target: 40-50k, somewhere around Sept-Oct
  • His rule right now is basically "do nothing, hold, let the orders fill if price comes to me"

What I respect about it: the discipline. He's not chasing, not flipping every time X gets loud, not FOMOing into shorts below 80k because he knows that's the messy zone. That part's real whether or not the call lands.

What I'd push back on: the certainty. "Final bottom 40-50k, Sept-October" is awfully precise for a market that's humbled everyone who's ever been that specific. He even says markets never move in straight lines then hands you a straight line. Bear maps always look clean in hindsight and never run on schedule.

And the thing nobody in these threads says out loud: being right about direction and surviving the path are two different skills. Plenty of people were "right" that Oct 10 would recover and still got wiped in the 3 seconds it took to get there. A perfect short thesis doesn't help if a relief rally to 90k closes you out before the drop you called.

So do you buy the 40-50k by fall? Or is this another confident roadmap the market's about to ignore? Curious where this sub lands.

Not financial advice, just chewing on someone else's homework.

reddit.com
u/SadNose6889 — 12 days ago