r/Hedera

As of yesterday it seems Servicenow validator is missing/down. When I go to the hashpack website and go to staking its blank. In my ledger it also shows validator is missing. When I go to hashscan, Servicenow doesn't show. Does anyone know if I can redelagate and get my rewards? Anyone know what's going on with Servicenow validator?

I almost made a mistake by not checking. I thought Hashport closing was Dovu specific related to when they switched chains to Hedera as I saw the notice first on the Dovu Discord.

Turns out the LINK I acquired through a hashpack swap may also be affected. I'm not sure what would have happened if i didnt swap back for Hbar but I'm glad i wont find out the hard way.

Hedera has Google, IBM, Boeing on its governing council. Processed $10B+ in settlements in 2025. Has an ETF. McLaren just joined.

And HBAR is sitting at $0.09.

The standard answer is "adoption takes time." But I think the real question is structural: if major enterprises are using the network via prepaid balances and closed systems, there's no actual buy pressure on HBAR. The network can grow 10x and the token stays flat.

Has anyone seen a credible mechanism that closes this gap? Not speculation — actual on-chain evidence that enterprise usage is translating into token demand?

Genuinely curious, not fudding.

>

I don't think anybody has posted about this yet but it seems like a very big deal because NVIDIA is contributing OpenShell and Nemotron products to this very large collaborative effort (the largest when it comes to an AI agent framework?) with an emphasis of promoting trust.

Edit: It looks like EQTY Labs recently announced that their "Verifiable Runtime" is engineered to work with NVIDIA's OpenShell so does that mean someone has to elect it as an "add on" or perhaps it would be incorporated by default?

Edit 2: This is an interesting quote from NVIDIA within the article:

“NVIDIA OpenShell and NVIDIA Nemotron models provide the secure runtime and intelligent foundation for Automation Anywhere’s EnterpriseClaw, enabling organizations to build and deploy autonomous, self-evolving agents with greater control, transparency and performance.”

Edit 3: I had a lull at work and dug in a little more. Looks like the OpenShell framework will give any enterprise exclusive control over their agents for whatever workflows they choose and EQTY's offering is merely an optional addition. Openshell basically controls what the agent can do at runtime. The industries that would require an additional audit trail for their agents' actions (sometimes years after the fact) would be the ones to elect EQTY's hardware-based attestation layer. Basically legal, health, insurance, finance, defense etc. They have a need to prove their regulatory compliance when it comes to patient information, banking standards etc.

I was trying to see how DOVU OS could fit into this too. I would think that Openshell would already have records of the person who authorized and attested to the agents' workflow within an organization and that they could simply build in the guardrails and consequences without needing a solution like DOVUs. Perhaps DOVU becomes more relevant when there are multiple organizations involved who cannot see into any internal structure of another company. Maybe DOVU's Blueprints will be like Openshell for cross-organizational agents dictating how they interact with each other and transparently recording the people involved with the decisions as well as whether or not the interactions transpired as they should. Although, perhaps this type of record-keeping or blueprint could also be addressed through these large collaborative open-source agent frameworks (produced by the companies this post was originally about). I hope that DOVU doesn't become irrelevant but perhaps I'm misunderstanding their offering. I'm not a tech guy after all.

Thinking about CLPR and token prices. Focus on one example, ie. ETH moving between Ethereum L1 and Hedera.

Firstly, I am not sure if the market can even price ETH on Hedera - for example, there might be some Hashspheres receiving ETH from Ethereum L1... OK, so there's less ETH on Ethereum, does that make the price of ETH go up? How does the market track ETH via CLPR on Hashspheres? So I'm wondering that for ANY token to be handled on Hedera, it must be created on Hedera mainnet first... Then the smart contracts for CLPR could also be on Hedera mainnet, ie. public, so anyone can call them for CLPR transfer. Right? Therefore SC calls will push tx on Hedera mainnet - nice. And that way as well liquidity can also be tracked... CLPR needs to live on Hedera mainnet is my thinking via a public coordination/routing SC.

All just questions and speculation, obviously.

But then, once ETH is on Hedera or a Hashsphere, surely the VALUE of ETH on Hedera/Hashsphere could be deemed as MORE than if it was native on Ethereum L1?

For example, transferring ETH back to Ethereum L1 from Hedera:

1. is slower than natively on Hedera
2. inherits all the risks of Ethereum and loses all the benefits of Hedera
3. Not sure if MEV comes into these transfers back to Ethereum L1, but hey, let's throw it in.

So my point is that pretty much every asset in the crypto sphere (and let's remember that other networks have no choice in whether this will happen or not, someone on Hedera or Hashsphere just have to want it to happen) would benefit on being on Hedera.

Then my mind goes to how defensive crypto networks are, and what could they do to try and prevent this transfer of liquidity to Hedera from happening? Maybe offer even better staking benefits with locking... but that would only work for so long, plus increasing staking benefits would put further strain on their treasuries and tokenomics/mining rewards models.

Would appreciate points from pointy heads in this sub.