r/HinduDiscussion

Arjuna was one of the greatest warriors alive.

And he collapsed.

Not from an enemy. Not from injury. From the weight of what he was about to face. His hands shook. His bow slipped. He sat down in the middle of the battlefield and said — I cannot do this.

Krishna did not tell him to breathe deeply. He did not say think positive. He asked him one question:

"You grieve for those who should not be grieved for — yet you speak words of wisdom. The wise grieve neither for the living nor the dead. Have you forgotten who you are?"

Modern anxiety comes from the same place Arjuna's did — we forget who we are. We attach to outcomes, to how people see us, to things we cannot control. The Gita does not give you a 5-step plan. It removes the wrong question and replaces it with the right one.

You are not the job title. Not the follower count. Not the result.

That one shift — if it actually lands — changes everything.

Have you ever had a moment where something from the Gita or Krishna's teachings actually hit differently and changed how you saw a situation?

I’m so curious about hinduism i want to be a part of it and don’t want to be stereotypical and follower of this religion by hearing of people words instead of this i want to read all the holy books in a sorted manner to understand everything every concept every detail…
I do know some basics like about ramayana but don’t know about anything in depth….
I want you all to please help me with the books podcast and everything that I should know about…
Thanku :)

This isn't meant to be a hate or troll post. Just genuinely wondering if you have a 'that's creepy' reaction, like I do, to some of the Hinduism religious imagery. The Shiva and Genesha imagery, while some of it is comforting, is also often creepy to me.

I also have the same reaction to imagery of Ancient Egyptian gods.

I wonder if you feel the same about any religious imagery, including Ancient Egyptian or even Christianity?

Thank you for any sincere replies. Really not trying to start anything negative but just wanted to know.

1• Lots of scriptures are completely wrong
2• Sapiens successfully migrated in Asia in 65,000 BCE
3• No evidence in Ayodhya and Ram Setu is not man-made

1.Lots of scriptures are completely wrong
Many major scriptures claim singularly that the events of Ramayana occured in the treta yuga of the 24th mahayuga of the current kalpa. Upon calculation, this suggests that Ramayana happened 18 million years ago.

But that is not possible. As per scientific evidence, there is no possibility that Sapiens existed before 500,000 BCE.

2. Sapiens successfully migrated in Asia in 65,000 BCE
   Since it is a well-established fact that Sapiens successfully migrated to Asia around 65k BCE, Ramayana must have happened after that, if it ever happened. That leaves a small timeline in which Ramayana could have occured.

3. No evidence in Ayodhya and Ram Setu is not Man made
   Civilisation clearly didn't exist in Ayodhya before 1500 BCE. Hence Ramayana couldn't have happened before that and it obviously didn't happen after that as monkeys couldn't fly at that time.
   Also pathetic attempts such as "all evidence could have been wiped out by a flood, etc." would be a waste of time as a civilisation with thousands of people leaves very strong evidences which can't be completely erased even by the worst natural disasters in the history of disasters.

Also, not a single evidence exists which can be seriously considered by the scientific community as proof of the Ram Setu being man-made.
And not only that, the GOI tasked CSIR- NIO in 2021 to find out about the true nature of Ram Setu. CSIR-NIO was expected to present results in 2024. But here we are in 2026, and no result has been presented. The excuse- We are facing problems in researching the land bridge. Just imagine, we managed to land a rover near the south pole of the moon— but we can't research a land bridge submerged 10 meters in water!!

I'm not looking to offend anyone, looking for people to argue against this

THIS IS WHAT I PERSONALLY BELIEVE AND PLEASE ITS NOTHING PERSONAL

TL;DR

1. Ramayana happened 18 million years ago, not possible, humans came at around 500,000 BCE
2. Humans migrated to asia at 65,000 BCE
3. Civilisation clearly didnt exist in Ayodhya before 1500 BCE. "All evidence could have been wiped out by flood" is a lazy excuse
4. Lowkey no evidence of Ram Setu being man-made

Hi everyone,

My wife and I recently welcomed our baby girl, and we're trying to find the perfect Indian/Hindu girl name.

We're looking for a name that is:

• Timeless and elegant
• Easy to pronounce
• Has a beautiful meaning
• Preferably rooted in Sanskrit or Indian culture
• Not overly trendy or made-up

If you could recommend one beautiful girl name that you genuinely love (and why), I'd really appreciate it.

We've gone through hundreds of names already, so we're hoping Reddit helps us discover a hidden gem.

Thank you! ❤️

Hey everyone,

I'm a Vaishnava with an interest in Vedanta and sampradaya philosophy. While reading about different Vaishnava traditions, I came across a question that I haven't been able to resolve satisfactorily.

What is the precise philosophical difference between Achintya Bhedabheda and Svabhavika Bhedabheda?

From my understanding, both accept that the jiva and jagat are simultaneously different and non-different from Bhagavan. However, I am struggling to identify where the actual doctrinal divergence lies.

Is the difference primarily that Gaudiya Vaishnavas describe this relationship as achintya (inconceivable), whereas the Nimbarka tradition describes it as svabhavika (natural or inherent)? Or are there deeper metaphysical differences regarding the nature of Brahman, jiva, prakriti, and their interrelationships?

Additionally, are there any schools, thinkers, or interpretations that could be viewed as a synthesis or middle ground between the two?

I'd appreciate insights from those familiar with either tradition, as well as any primary sources or scholarly references.

Jai Shri Sitaram!

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DW8k3etRJ9c/?igsh=cGpwcHdtMTB3ZW0y

I have just watched this video and it doesn't sit well with me. I've always thought that animal sacrifice was ridiculous (no offense) and what the person tells in this video is that as you perform this, there is an ascension, that you rise to an higher position 🫩. That it is an act done by keeping the welfare of the society in mind

Are people even real. Why do they think that killing a species which is considered intellectually below us is okay? That it's done for good?

Can anyone explain the reason behind this absurd thinking?

I kept 16 somvar vrat for my partner and by 5th vrat i got to know that he was double dating and cheated on me. Should I continue with the vrat or do the udyapan? When I took sankalp, i asked Shivji that if we are right for each other get us married and if not, part our ways?He lied about everything. It's a very recent breakup mere 6 days ago. Should I continue with the vrats?

[supprimé]