r/IowaPolitics

went through every answer from last night's hinson/turek debate for manipulation techniques, and checked their claims

i run a small site that reads political language for manipulation techniques (loaded language, name calling, that kind of thing). it doesn't say who's right, it just flags the wording. ran last night's iowa pbs debate through it, every answer, and checked who was talking by hand against the video

hinson: 10 of 30 answers flagged, mostly loaded language and name calling

turek: 4 of 22, mostly loaded language and exaggeration

also looked up 114 of their factual claims against fact checkers, congress.gov, wire stories etc. honestly most couldn't be settled by any source. the ones that could were mostly true but missing something. hinson's "zero crossings at the southern border" is dhs's number for releases, not crossings. turek's "$20 billion to argentina" was a currency swap line, not a grant

every answer links to that spot in the video so you can check it yourself. link in the comments. doing the oct 13 one too. if something's flagged wrong tell me, i read everything

reddit.com
u/jayubba — 7 days ago
▲ 635 r/IowaPolitics+1 crossposts

Local Iowa and Alaska news outlets bust Trump’s lies about new steel plant and oil pipeline projects that are completely untrue

Source article and video here (published October 2, 2026): https://www.ms.now/the-briefing-with-jen-psaki/watch/local-news-busts-trump-on-empty-economic-promises-2516183107845

——

Get out and vote, America! ✅

Visit Vote.org for online voter guides for every state, including voter registration forms, absentee ballot applications, and information on deadlines, directions, and ID and residency requirements. 🗳️

u/T_Shurt — 12 days ago
▲ 23 r/IowaPolitics+1 crossposts

i ran every online ad in the alaska senate race through a model that flags manipulation techniques

i've been collecting every facebook/instagram and youtube ad in the alaska senate race and running the text through a model that flags manipulation techniques (loaded language, name calling, appeal to fear, that kind of thing). it doesn't say whether an ad is true, just how it's worded.

142 ads so far, 93 of them (65%) use at least one. that's the highest of the 13 senate races i'm tracking.

share of the 142 ads with each technique:

- loaded language: 46% (66 ads)

- appeal to prejudice: 42% (59)

- name calling: 28% (40)

- false urgency: 27% (38)

- glittering generalities: 24% (34)

- black-and-white fallacy: 22% (31)

- card stacking: 20% (28)

- conspiracy appeal: 13% (19)

the words that keep showing up in the flagged phrases: "liberal" (20 ads, e.g. "lower 48 liberals") and "sold" (10 ads, e.g. "sold Alaskans out").

biggest outside spender per fec filings: SLF PAC, $8.2M opposing Peltola.

every ad is on one page with what got flagged and who paid for it: https://semblen.com/races/ak-senate?ref=reddit

online ads only, no tv. the model gets things wrong sometimes, so each ad shows the exact words it flagged.

u/jayubba — 12 days ago