Democratic 2024 After-Action Report Released with Annotations
It's a biggun, but there's a lot of "no evidence provided" annotations.
It's a biggun, but there's a lot of "no evidence provided" annotations.
MS NOW is basically handing Gavin Newsom a two-hour primetime political convention disguised as a news event. The network isn't simply covering the Center for American Progress IDEAS conference -- it's acting as the official media partner, moderating the conversations, livestreaming the event across its platforms, then repackaging the "best moments" into a nationally televised primetime special. At some point, this stops looking like journalism and starts looking like....that's just it, like what?
MS NOW itself boasts that it reaches tens of millions of viewers and generates billions of online views. That kind of sustained, curated exposure has enormous political value, whether anyone wants to admit it or not. No, it's not illegal. But when a national media network effectively builds a branded television event around a likely presidential candidate, the line between news coverage and campaign promotion becomes very difficult to ignore.
Your eyes aren't playing tricks on you. Down in the right-hand corner is is a promotion featuring Gavin Newsom and Rafeal Warnock. The caption: "We the People America's Future". "We the People" is an MSNOW on going series and also just happens to be the network's general theme. In this particular episode the convention included In this conferences theres, Senator Ruben Gallego, Gov. Miki Sherrill, Haken Jeffires, Gov Abigal Spanberger, Gov Newsom, Senator Andy Kim, Senator Liz Warren, Senator Raphael Warnock, Senator Cory Booker and Gov. Wes Moore. Of the potential presidential hopefuls, there's Wes Moore, Cory Booker and Gavin Newsom. Newsom is the only among the potential presidential candiates that's getting the star treatment. Why.
https://reddit.com/link/1ter5et/video/iazbzvjrld0h1/player
This was just today. Notice how Susan Del Persio was so anxious to slander Harris she didn't even answer the question she was asked. Pay close attention to the absurd accusation she makes. Essentially accusing Harris of being dishonest about her public statements regarding her potential run for president. Please, please, please , just listen to it yourself.
https://reddit.com/link/1ter5et/video/e0uphtfpmd0h1/player
Here Alex Witt plays a clip of Stephen A. Smith, someone you never see on MSNOW, then shows a poll where she deceptively presents Gavin Newsom as the frontrunner. This poll specifically asks the question of who voters would vote for if the primary were held on the day of the poll. Harris leads on that question. Witt didn't show those results. Then she asks: "Does the Democratic Party need to better listen to who voters want versus party leader leading that effort?". What is she even talking about? Party leaders aren't leading any effort
https://reddit.com/link/1ter5et/video/4zhz0p1pnd0h1/player
Here , after noting that Hariss and Newsom were leading in the polls, Witt just comes right out and asks "What kinds of things can be done to catipult lessor know candidates to the front of the pack".
The infamous autopsy report hasn't been released. It may never be released. The author worked on her campaign.
https://reddit.com/link/1tg0n95/video/55eqmrv2ar1h1/player
This poll diverges noticeably from the broader recent polling consensus. Most other surveys from April–early May 2026 (Harvard-Harris, YouGov, Echelon, etc.) showed Kamala Harris with a clearer lead or much stronger positioning, with AOC typically in the 8–12% range. AOC jumping to 26% and taking first place is a significant departure. Witt doesn't bother to mention this poll is a clear outlier.
This continues a pattern with Alex Witt doing Kamala Dirty ( see more ).
https://reddit.com/link/1tg0n95/video/ldwegpxdar1h1/player
Here she presents the poll deceptively. The metric she shows is of "electability". The same poll, again, shows Kamala Harris in the lead. The question she asks regarding "what voters want" is asked in this poll. Kamala Harris narrowly leads Harris on that question. Witt didn't show those results.
It has since been changed but I woke up to this image at the top of my NY Times Direct email. I wrote to the editor and customer service how discussed I was. Glad I took a screenshot of it to prove I was not seeing things but I am still disgusted. I would not expect this of NY Times.
https://reddit.com/link/1t9jltm/video/iazbzvjrld0h1/player
This was just today. Notice how Susan Del Persio was so anxious to slander Harris she didn't even answer the question she was asked. Pay close attention to the absurd accusation she makes. Essentially accusing Harris of being dishonest about her public statements regarding her potential run for president. Please, please, please , just listen to it yourself.
https://reddit.com/link/1t9jltm/video/e0uphtfpmd0h1/player
Here Alex Witt plays a clip of Stephen A. Smith, someone you never see on MSNOW, then shows a poll where she deceptively presents Gavin Newsom as the frontrunner. This poll specifically asks the question of who voters would vote for if the primary were held on the day of the poll. Harris leads on that question. Witt didn't show those results. Then she asks: "Does the Democratic Party need to better listen to who voters want versus party leader leading that effort?". What is she even talking about? Party leaders aren't leading any effort
https://reddit.com/link/1t9jltm/video/4zhz0p1pnd0h1/player
shows