University suggested I change lanes?
So I have been accepted into university that will find my clinical placements. This is a big relief since I understand that this is one of the worst parts of practitioner school. With that said, I applied for the family nurse practitioner track, as I am told this one is the most verse at Alain will allow me to work in Acute and also primary care settings.
The professor who offered me acceptance since the University said that, based on my goals in my admissions essay, they feel that I would be better for the adult gerontology primary care, nurse practitioner track. They have always suggested that I pick this path instead.
I did some research and I don’t really understand. I mean, I get the adult gerontology… If it was the Acute path. I work in an ER now and would definitely like that option in the future. But being strictly stuck in primary care was not something I feel like I was shouting toward. Maybe it was just that I didn’t mention kids that much.
What is important to me is to have the ability to work in primary care or in Acute Care should I choose. I am OK with going back later if I want the Acute gerontology specialty so I can deal with critical patients.
My thinking was that the family nurse practitioner license would allow me to work inpatient at hospitals even if it is vertical track type stuff… With the option to do the 9 to 5 thing.
I have a new baby at home and I definitely wanna be there for her life and not stop doing overnight on call weekends, etc. forever. With that said, I like the idea that I can jump around if I need to earn more for my family or if our needs change. So I thought FNP would be the way.
Does anybody have any advice or feel like maybe this Proffesor is on something or if they are just trying to fill out their adult program?
To me it seems like the adult primary program kind of limits you a lot.