r/Philanthropy

Trying to locate donors to connect with nonprofits

Hi! I started a project that allows people to anonymously plant flowers on a global map.

I was pleasantly surprised how many people participated in such a short time, so I decided to set goals:

- 500 planted flowers and I donated to a pollinator fund
- 1000 flowers and I planted a tree in my local park here in Puerto Vallarta
- 2000 flowers and I plan to donate to another pollinator fund
- 5000 to be determined, but you get the idea...

The thing is, it's all coming out of my pocket and I wasn't planning on creating a business model that costs money. 😄 But I did manage to create a platform that gets people excited about participating as a team towards a goal - one that makes a real impact in the world. I posted videos about the progress, about the process, the planting of the tree, etc. People are genuinely happy to be a part of this and I've received so much positive feedback.

So now, I'm searching to find people who may want to donate to future milestone's selected organizations. I'm not looking for large amounts, but I think it's a nice way to connect and feature both the organization and the person giving.

I want to showcase good people doing good things.

Note: I am NOT asking for donations. I'm asking how to locate people who may want to donate to environmental nonprofits.

Where would I find such a group of people?
How could I pitch this idea?

I really appreciate your answers. This is all new territory for me. I'm a software designer by trade, but the nonprofit / charity side of things is a bit outside of my wheelhouse.

reddit.com
u/Daisey_Daze — 2 days ago
▲ 106 r/Philanthropy+2 crossposts

I was curious to know how much funding is deployed to conservation efforts near me. I started by pulling a list of organizations using conservation-related tax codes, and cross referencing with the Land Trust Alliance and a few other sources. Financial records for 501(c)3 non-profit organizations in the U.S. are publicly accessible. So, once I had a list of organizations, I was able to fetch recent financial records for all organizations. I then plotted all funding values on the map using the organization's location.

The largest organizations are active all over the world, so their values should be excluded from any sort of local analysis. The area near DC, for example, shows billions in funding due to organizations such as the Nature Conservancy.

Curious to hear what y'all glean from this. Is there anything you'd like to see included in the map?

speakforthetrees.com
u/iris_good — 3 days ago

Where do I look for donors that are not motivated by tax break and are open to experimental new ways to allocate donation?

Hi r/Philanthropy. I am career aid worker working on a passion project that involves a novel approach to direct aid allocation that aims to change how donations are made to persons in need around the world. I am not including links, this post is not about the project itself.

I think most members here are US based, I am not. I would really appreciate your advice on what would be the best way for me to look for donors that may be:

- Interested in novel experimental approaches and allocate part of their funding accordingly

- have preference for direct donations and do not care much about tax cuts, at least at a smaller scale of donations

Is there particular communities/forums that would make sense for em to explore, instead of blasting cold messages to people?

Should I pay someone to help me find and engage potential donors?

Appreciate any advice.

reddit.com
u/DrobnaHalota — 3 days ago

United Nations-designated International Days and Weeks and Years can be leveraged for both getting the word out about your nonprofit and for fundraising.

United Nations-designated International Days and Weeks and Years can be leveraged for both getting the word out about your nonprofit and for fundraising.

Each day, week and year has a designated theme. Many come with ready-to-use artwork and social media keyword tags you can use.

Your social media or newsletter messaging can be simple: "Today is the International Day of xxxx. You can support our nonprofit's work regarding this cause by donating at xxxxx." You can expand it much more, detailing your work, having an event in conjunction with the day, and posting information onlinr leading up to the day.

You can find a list of UN days and weeks here.

As has already been noted on this subreddit, 2026 is the International Year of Volunteers for Sustainable Development, per the 25th anniversairy of the International Year of Volunteers in 2001.

2026 is also the International Year of the Woman Farmer and the International Year of Rangelands and Pastoralists.

2027 will be the International Year of Legal Literacy and the International Year of Sustainable and Resilient Tourism, though more designations may happen before the year stars. You can see a list of UN Years by designation here.

Is your charity, nonprofit or other mission-based organization leveraging UN designated days, weeks or years in some way for fundraising or awareness building? Please share in the comments.

reddit.com
u/jcravens42 — 3 days ago

I will not donate to St.Jude anymore, need to find a better organization!

Normally, these kinds of things probably shouldn’t be discussed publicly, but what happened on the airplane really bothered me, and I haven’t been able to get over it.

What particularly irritated me is that I work for a multinational company in a country-management role, and even in that position, I personally don’t prefer to fly business class on domestic flights. However, it seems St. Jude has a different policy. The entire group I saw was flying business class from Raleigh to Chicago.

I found that quite unfortunate. When I donate to an organization like St. Jude, I do so with the belief that the money is primarily going toward helping children and supporting their mission—not toward providing business-class flights for managers on domestic routes.

I donate to St. Jude a couple of times a year based on my personal feelings and desire to support the cause. At the same time, I’ve been receiving relentless calls and mail from them, including paper notebooks and address stickers. After seeing this, I honestly started wondering whether I should reconsider how I support the organization.

I’m not saying this to attack St. Jude or question the important work they do for children. I’m simply sharing why this experience left a bad impression on me and made me question how donor money is being spent.

reddit.com
u/ShadowKnight_1 — 7 days ago

Buying annuities for the homeless and other poor individuals

Should philanthropists focus on buying lifetime fixed-income annuities for the homeless and poor individuals such as older people who didn't plan well and have chronic illness and not much of a safety net? I was thinking of people like Warren Buffet and Mackenzie Scott...would their billions be better off annuitized and cash-transferred to the poor?

reddit.com
u/Usr7_0__- — 6 days ago

Corporate Philanthropy / Grantmaking Platform Referrals

Not sure if this is the best place for my question. I work for a national corporate foundation who has been using Benevity in recent years. We’ve had continued issues with the platform and not great customer service. We are looking at other vendors since the cost becomes more and more expensive and everything is nickel and dimed after the contract is signed. We use it for grant making and employee giving and volunteering, including corporate matches. It houses our applications during our various RFP windows throughout the year.

As we are looking at other vendors, I would love to learn what other medium to large size foundations are using for these purposes. Our internal vendors team is vetting a handful of vendors now, but looking for actual firsthand experience. I would love to find something that still does both but at the end of the day, would you separate platforms if they are the best and can communicate with each other. Thank you for any guidance!!

reddit.com
u/Calm_Flow — 6 days ago

Wall Street’s Nonprofits Use Selective, Opaque Logic to Defund Charities

Hi r/Philanthropy,

We thought folks in this community may be interested in our latest:

As you may know, a quarter of all individual giving in the U.S. is made through donor-advised funds, giving their sponsors vast power to decide which charities can receive donor dollars. Three major DAF sponsors have deemed the Southern Poverty Law Center ineligible for donations after President Donald Trump’s Justice Department indicted the organization in April on controversial fraud charges.

We decided to investigate how these Wall Street-affiliated funds make these high-stakes decisions. We uncovered troubling inconsistencies in how some DAF sponsors applied their policies — and found that donors and affected charities are routinely left in the dark about how decisions are made.

The three DAF sponsors that cut off donations to the SPLC — Vanguard Charitable, Fidelity Charitable and Charles Schwab’s DAFgiving360 — are nonprofits spun off from major brokerages. They offer account holders immediate tax deductions on contributions they can later recommend be granted to charities. (ProPublica has received donations through each of these groups.) These sponsors say their decisions to freeze accounts are viewpoint neutral, and ProPublica found no evidence to the contrary. Removed groups spanned the political spectrum. 

But ProPublica found that Fidelity Charitable and DAFgiving360 appeared to apply their policies unevenly. Experts say the opacity behind these decisions is particularly problematic under the Trump administration, which has a track record of making politically charged accusations that don’t hold up in court.

Here's our full investigation: https://www.propublica.org/article/donor-advised-funds-charity-contributions

All three fund sponsors declined to be interviewed for our story or answer detailed questions, including on their process for identifying nonprofits facing allegations and choosing which to ban. Fidelity Charitable said it does not comment on decisions involving individual charities. DAFgiving360 said it “communicates directly with donors when a grant recommendation is impacted by an eligibility determination.” Vanguard Charitable noted its “procedural pause” is “not a value judgment.”

u/propublica_ — 6 days ago

Answers on grant proposals if nonprofits were brutally honest with funders (humor & (discussion prompt))

Answers on grant proposals if nonprofits were brutally honest with funders is a blog by Vu Le of Nonprofit AF, and I think it's both hilarious and dead on about the unrealistic expectations of funders when it comes to nonprofits. An excerpt:

How will the community be transformed as a result of this grant? 

Hahahaha, that’s a good one! This grant is for $5,000! And people say funders don’t have a sense of humor! 5K will allow us to pay for six weeks of rent, which means we can stay open, and who knows what awesome stuff we’ll accomplish during those six weeks, am I right? Please add three zeroes if you really want to see transformation.

Have a read of the original post. And what would YOU add? If you are really worried about staying absolutely anonymous, you can DM me with your comment and I'll post it in the comments for you.

u/jcravens42 — 7 days ago
▲ 0 r/Philanthropy+1 crossposts

Built a free, open-source tool to help rank donors by major-gift likelihood

I built PhilanthroPy after seeing how many shops either pay for expensive wealth-screening vendors or do donor scoring in spreadsheets with no way to check if the numbers are even trustworthy. It's a free Python toolkit that takes your CRM export and gives you a 0–100 score per constituent for major-gift likelihood, lapse risk, and planned-giving intent — basically a sorted call list for your gift officers instead of a flat donor list.

No coding background needed to run the included example, though someone on your team (or a volunteer/consultant) will need basic Python to hook it to your actual CRM export. MIT licensed, free forever, no vendor lock-in. Happy to answer questions about what it can/can't do — it's not a replacement for a real wealth-screening vendor, but it's a solid first pass, and it's transparent about how the scores are computed, which most vendor tools aren't.

https://github.com/PhilanthroPy-Project/PhilanthroPy

u/Striking_Ad_9716 — 7 days ago

Another story on predatory fundraising, this time from John Oliver

High-pressure fundraising tactics are found in political campaigns, in religious organizations, and in nonprofits.

I recently posted about one such campaign, in association with a certain elected official. Last night, I watched a video from several years ago from John Oliver about predatory fundraising tactics used by Christian televangelists. And what struck me when he was showing the fundraising solicitations that he was getting as a result of donating to one ministry was that I saw some of those tactics myself in fundraising mail I got from a variety of nonprofits last December, when I somehow ended up on every fundraising mailing list imaginable. I really should have taken photos of the letters and items I was sent to guilt me into giving money. Getting a dollar bill or a check for a tiny amount along with a solicitation letter, as Oliver details in his video? Yep, there were two different nonprofits that did that.

These predatory fundraising tactics seem to target the elderly and the desperate.

Have you received such solicitations? Have you ever stopped giving to a nonprofit because of such a tactic?

u/jcravens42 — 10 days ago

Threats as fundraising: ethics?

How do you feel about this form of fundraising?

A Wednesday email blast from US President Donald Trump told followers their “supporter status” had been canceled, directing them to donate in order to restore their standing in the MAGA movement.

With a subject line reading, “I’ve got a massive headache,” the email continued with a purported quote from the president asking, “Don’t tell me this is true?”

“YOUR SUPPORTER STATUS HAS BEEN CANCELLED,” the fundraising effort declared. A yellow button then promised a “FIANL [sic] CHANCE TO MAKE THIS RIGHT.”

“The thought of losing you makes my head hurt. I know you would never intend to cancel your journey with the MAGA Movement and me,” the alleged Trump quote continued. “If you’re still with us, I need you to send me your signature to renew your MAGA Membership before the hour clock runs out.”

Although the email claims to require only a “signature,” the button redirects users to a page soliciting fiscal gifts.

Trump’s fundraising tactics have come under increased scrutiny in recent weeks.

According to a report, Trump’s fundraising network has brought in more than $800 million since his return to office

More from Mediaite.

u/jcravens42 — 14 days ago

Employees at AI companies are about to come into billions of dollars. Will they become philanthropists?

Two nearly trillion-dollar AI companies, ChatGPT developer OpenAI and Claude creator Anthropic, are expected to go public soon, making hundreds of current and former employees ultrawealthy. Rough estimates by a tech industry insider suggest that Anthropic’s IPO, which could happen in September, may result in $15 billion a year in additional philanthropic giving alone. Will these employees really become philanthropists and give some of that money to nonprofits / charitable causes? Donations from these newly wealthy folks are far from guaranteed. The IPOs may get delayed or go poorly and leave employees clinging onto their wealth. Industry observers are also concerned that a paralyzing number of charitable options and natural fickleness could prompt workers to keep more for themselves than anticipated.

Anthropic’s seven founders have pledged to donate 80 percent of their wealth, and the company has agreed to chip in one or three shares for every one its employees commit to giving, depending on when they joined and up to a certain limit. Some employees are aligned with a philosophy known as effective altruism that encourages making impactful donations sooner rather than later.

Jack Lewars, a consultant who advised 13 ultrarich tech and finance workers on their charitable giving last year, says he’s heard that employees at the AI labs are receiving as many as 20 unsolicited emails a week from groups seeking donations.

More from Wired.

How could nonprofits prepare for engaging with these newly wealthy people?

u/jcravens42 — 14 days ago

The Arcus Foundation announced that it will wind down operations in 2029.

In July, the Arcus Foundation announced that it will wind down operations in 2029. The foundation’s LGBTQ social justice program will honor all grant commitments currently in progress and continue making new grants until October 2028. Ape conservation grantmaking will continue under the current strategy and transition in 2027 to a new U.K.-based charity, WildLives Earth, that will support the conservation of endangered species, including great apes and gibbons.

During its 25 years of operations, the foundation has been among the largest private donors to both LGBTQ rights and ape conservation. Its funding has contributed to notable successes, including legal and policy changes in a range of countries in Africa and the Americas that have increased protections for LGBTQ people, the end of biomedical research on chimpanzees in the United States, and an increase in habitats with stable or growing ape populations.

Over the past 25 years, Arcus Founder and Board President Jon Stryker has contributed hundreds of millions of dollars through the foundation to more than 500 organizations, in addition to millions more donated in his private capacity.

“My commitment to both LGBTQ rights and endangered species is unchanged,” Stryker said. “I’m proud of the foundation’s long partnerships with so many fearless human rights defenders and conservationists around the world during the past quarter century.

“I intend to continue supporting these causes through philanthropic vehicles that I will be modeling in the very near future.”

Official announcement.

reddit.com
u/jcravens42 — 13 days ago