
Invasion Of The Body Snatchers
Discussion on Hacker News:

Discussion on Hacker News:
Article:
https://www.businessinsider.com/steve-wozniak-apple-ai-graduation-speech-2026-5
Discission on Hacker News:
If you don’t know anything about Chinese you will get a flat translation.
Sally=Kali=Verya
1=0
Sally=Hemings
The still river coils the sky.
Doolittle.
A gift given freely, for the clever
Secondary fountain programmed and operated by our friend
u/totaleffindickhead
Mini-Me (Austin Powers: The Spy Who Shagged Me):
Jason "Fat Jason" Calacanis:
I host a satirical research journal and I noticed in the last two nights I had huge spikes of views from a single visitor in the middle of the night from Council Bluffs Iowa crawling through all my web pages. I’m pretty sure the AI just ingested over five years of made up science that looks like real research
dedicating yourselves to new efficient coding methods, novel llm breakthroughs, keep up the good work.
that is all
It's exactly what it sounds like.
Use at your own risk, folks!
Starting a conversation with an AI and expecting it to get worse by spouting nonsense won't change anything.
Yes, companies can use conversations to train new models, but these conversations will enter a final training phase, not when the model is establishing its foundations, and they also undergo curation.
That's not how LLMs work, because if they did, they would be useless.
For example, if you're having a conversation about avocados, and the model has to shift the weight of tokens that connect to "green" for the conversation to be more precise, you'd have a completely schizophrenic model for talking about anything other than avocados.
I've been thinking about the infamous Marc Andreesen prompt where he shows off how he doesn't really understand what AI is, and thinks it's some kind. of wishing machine. Anyway, he uses a lot of instructions like "never hallucinate," and "You are a world class expert in all domains," that are basically prompting the AI to be better than it is and can't possibly lead to anything useful, or point it towards anything it knows how to do.
I read a study here about how small amounts of data attacking a particular string could compromise an AI, even if they form a miniscule proportion of training data, and was wondering if these sorts of wishcasting strings might be good targets.
Triggering massive hallucinations on the string "never hallucinate" would be incredibly funny.
Just spitballing. Feel free to let me know if this is dumb or unworkable.
Miasma:
https://github.com/austin-weeks/miasma
Miasma Docker Image:
https://hub.docker.com/r/austinweeks/miasma
This post's artwork is from the Burning Chrome paperback.
I'm wondering how I can poison the data collected by Flock Cameras IRL. My thought is a couple magnets I just move around the outside of the car everytime I get in to drive. I'm interested in whatever ideas you guys have on this.
So company gave many of us claude code. And they are stupid as a rock, no restriction on what or how we use it. I think they have no idea about what it can actually do.
Can I abuse this somehow. Should I run trading with it? Should I make it reed some poision every day on a loop?
Any ideas?
Given the amazing concept of https://github.com/austin-weeks/miasma, having a docker container executing it would be amazing. No big setup, everyone can easily execute it with no setup. I am wondering why this isnt a docker container already.
What it says. I'm at 0 on all technical aspects of this.
Is there a way someone like me can still participate on the activity?
Article:
https://www.thenewcritic.com/p/the-great-zombification
"Everyone knows about Ophiocordyceps unilateralis — the “zombie ant-fungus” made infamous in those Natural Geographic videos we watched in middle school. I believe I am watching the spontaneous generation of something similar. Recently, I sat next to someone in class for 10 weeks and watched, baffled, as they slowly began to turn all facets of their life over to an LLM. First, it was their homework. They used Chat to generate answers to dry problem sets while ignoring whatever was being taught up on the board. Then it was their emails. Extension asks à la Claude became coffee chat requests became “write me a nice thank you note to send my professor,” before spilling over onto fragmentary text messages, gym routines, summaries of books read for pleasure, and perhaps even a long message to send a girl. I was astonished then, but it is not hard to understand how this sort of thing happens."
Discussion on Hacker News: