I had originally created this for the RTD competition, but I was miles away from finishing before the deadline so I took my time to complete it to my own satisfaction. I tried to use the oval and its original chicanes as much as practical, while creating layouts that were fast and challenging while staying safe for all categories. The new pit lane is capable of hosting endurance racing as well.

Feedback, praise and criticism welcome! Created in Inkscape.

The circuit has been changed a bit, here i will use the real anti-clockwise turn numbers for the bike course, The whole track has been repaved and is now a minimum 10m wide.

• The start straight has been straightened and widen to 12m.
• Turn One has been widen to 12m with the extra 2m width added to the outside of the corner, Kerb has been extended.
• Turn Two has been widen to 12m, the inside kerb is the pre-renovation kerb, Inside the kerb is a paved section so cars can brake and turn to reduce the chances and impact of coming back onto the track. There is asphalt on the other side of the exit outside kerb and is for an alternative pit exit.
• Turn Three, the track narrows to 10m and the corner has been given a greater radius by moving the track left over the old kerb. There is asphalt on the inside for the clockwise direction circuit. The car circuit can still be used and has no changes made.
• Turn Four the track is unchanged, there is between 1-2 meters of asphalt on the outside covering what used to be the sandtrap on the edge of the circuit. The wall has been moved back to add more runoff right infront of turn 4, and to make runoff for the clockwise circuit, the wall on the exit of the turn has been moved back about a meter to shallow the impact angle.
• The run to the Hairpin, the track has been widened to 10m with the wall on the right moving to make space for the track and the verge.
• The Turn Five Hairpin. The track has not been changed except for a new inside  and outside entry (exit for clockwise) kerb, there is more space on the outside of the turn as the walls have been moved back and runoff extended. The tyre barrier is moved when the track changes direction.
• The Back Straight. On the left a concrete wall has been installed to ensure that cars, bikes and riders do not impact with the wrong side of the Armco barriers and its posts that is against the track between turns 4 & 5, on the right a concrete wall replaces the earth and tyre barriers. 400m after the hairpin a temporary wall section will be moved between direction changes to allow access.
• Turn Six, the Track has not been changed, the new wall on the left has been connected to the exiting wall and the sand trap has been extended towards turn 5. The new wall extends around to turn 7
• Turn Seven. Two new sand traps, one on the left to slow cars that went off at Turn 6 before they cross the track between turns 7 & 8, the other on the right aswell as a new kerb primarily for the clockwise circuit. On the exit of the corner an alternative pit exit for the clockwise circuit is behind the outside exit kerb which has been moved to allow the track to widen to 12m, the sand trap has been extended.
• Turn Eight. The turn has been widened, The original pit entry is still there going straight ahead, aswell as the original inside kerb. The exit of the corner has been tightened with a new kerb place where the turn radius decreases to allow for more runoff for the turn exit with the old track surface being left for paved runoff behind a new kerb and to straighten the starting straight.

The Clockwise circuit for both cars and bikes will use the anti-clockwise bike circuit as the other option will be too dangerous without moving the wall next to the right of turn 1 & 2 and I do not want to reduce spectator viewing spots.

I get why the made the other changes in 2010 with the infield and I don’t want it get into that now.

But why did they change the profile of club corner?

I feel like the older profile was much better for racing. It was wider, would allow cars to run side by side through there and allowed drivers to use different lines through the corner (run wide and carry the speed vs cut it tight and shorten the distance)

I don’t think it would affect the pit lane and buildings as it is far enough away. I can’t see how the older layout is anymore dangerous for cars or bikes as it doesn‘t have that much higher exist speed.

Any ideas for the reason of this change?

This is Pt.2 of my post from yesterday

For context, this is a render of what Autódromo Internacional de Xique Xique Could've looked like had it been built in the 2000s. Read the Interview to understand its background and the process behind its creation.

Credit to Quattro for the Logo :)

FIA Grade 2/FIM Grade A

The circuit is set in the city of Haarlem, it is made for Touring car racing. It has 15 turns and it's 3.3 kilometres long. I also hate the t4-t5 chicane, but there is literally no space for runoff, so I have to slow the cars down. If you have any other questions, please ask. It is my most serious project yet, and I would be happy if you give me feedback.

Hey everyone,

I'm currently at a stage where I'm reaching out to YouTubers to share my upcoming game's trailer, and now ı see that it is harder than ı thought.

Most of the time, I simply don't get a response. When I do, it's often a paid promotion offer, which is completely understandable, but difficult for me as a solo developer with a very limited marketing budget.

Is this a common problem or only ı have this difficulty?

This situation let me start to thing, and I'm genuinely curious whether it's actually useful or completely pointless.

What if there was a dedicated YouTube channel focused exclusively on indie game content which created by developer?

The idea would be simple:

• 100% focused on indie games.
• Developers create their own content and keep full control over it.
• Free submissions through a simple form.
• Trailers/contents will be organized by genre.
• No paid placement or priority system.
• All submissions are welcome, but trailers must meet a basic quality guidelines (clear trailer, readable text, audio quality, etc.) to ensure viewers can expect a consistently good experience.

So expectation is dev. will make a content about their game. only trailer is also okey but making a small speech may increase the quality of video and there will be a fix comment on video that dev. will answer questions about game.

The obvious problem is that such a channel would start with exactly zero subscribers, so ıf devs will support channel it my have a chance so we can release our contents in youtube more easily.

So I create this channel. https://www.youtube.com/@IndieGameInn

What do you think? Does this idea would work? Would you consider sharing your game on a channel like this? Why or why not?

Autódromo Internacional Xique-Xique, A collaboration between R32 & Quattro

Credits to Quattro for making the website, logo, and magazine front page.

Below I will link the website, where you can read the full interview regarding the Creative process behind Autódromo Internacional Xique-Xique, an old, 80's concept that was later revived in the 2000s

Anti clock wise circuit

16 corners

Heavy-Left Turn Demanding

5.2km

(Forgot to put barriers, and also I kinda over exaggerated on the runoff amount:v)

Track width ~ 13.5m

Any constructive criticism would be appreciated.