
A landmark trial in California could force a major reckoning over what social media companies knew about their impact on children.
As reported by CBC News, a bipartisan group of 29 U.S. states is suing Meta, accusing the company of deliberately designing Facebook and Instagram to keep young people hooked while misleading the public about their safety.
The allegations are striking. California's deputy attorney general told jurors that Meta's model was to keep users on its platforms for as long as possible and harvest their data, arguing that this strategy worked particularly well with children.
The states say internal communications described Instagram as a “drug,” employees as “pushers,” and “teen time spent” as a goal. Former Meta safety engineer Arturo Bejar testified that safety was not adequately considered when products such as Reels were initially rolled out.
Meta strongly denies that its products are addictive and argues the research does not establish a clear causal link between adolescent social media use and poorer well-being.
But this case isn't only about damages. If Meta is found liable, the judge could order fundamental changes to Facebook and Instagram. The states are seeking measures including removing likes and infinite scroll for younger users, introducing time limits and more effectively keeping children under 13 off the platforms.
That could have consequences far beyond the United States.
For parents, teachers and anyone who has watched children grow up alongside smartphones, this is a conversation worth having. How much responsibility belongs to parents, and how much belongs to corporations that employ teams of experts to understand exactly what keeps people scrolling?
Should features such as infinite scroll and algorithmic recommendations be regulated differently for children?
And if evidence ultimately shows companies understood the risks to young people but prioritized engagement and profit anyway, what should meaningful accountability look like?
CBC's continuing coverage of cases like this matters because the decisions being made about these enormous technology platforms affect Canadians too. Public-interest journalism has an important role in getting beyond the tech-company talking points and showing us what emerges in court, including the internal documents and testimony that the public otherwise might never see.
This trial is expected to last about six weeks, and Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg and Instagram chief Adam Mosseri could both testify. We'll be watching what CBC's reporting uncovers as it unfolds.