r/TheLoophole

Hello! I am currently studying “Principle Conform” and not matter how many times I read over it- I can not understand how the only provable concept is in the necessary condition.
To explain my thought process: In the “Real Principle Example”, I thought the judgement gives us the exact conditions in which a failure to keep a promise is wrong. Therefore, when a condition of that failure is met then something wrong had occurred. I thought that if both those conditions appeared in an answer choice, that would then be enough to prove that a failure to keep a promise had been wrong.

Would anyone mind helping me understand this? It’s driving me crazy and I really want to grasp this concept. Thank you!!