r/VtuberDrama

How is this guy not banned yet

If you need reminders

https://www.reddit.com/r/VtuberDrama/comments/1v5lr6g/psa\_softendocmk\_is\_now\_impersonating\_the\_retired/

https://www.reddit.com/r/VtuberDrama/comments/1uxt40m/schizo\_pedo\_fire\_fetish\_gross\_chud\_usoftendocmk/

https://www.reddit.com/r/VtuberDrama/comments/1qlxnfb/infamous\_sexpest\_and\_pedo\_usoftendocmk\_harassing/

For context (from my understanding) Shiki Katagami (an FPS talent) is currently in drama for being a BFE streamer while allowing children in his community which yes, is weird and people are rightfully upset about him for that

But he is not engaging with anything 1 on 1 with children and he's not trying to groom absolutely anybody (that we know of ig)

Im Drained..

and DONT think i dont know there are powdur simps creeping in this sub. again yall make it too damn obvious.

I NOTICED the patterns in the comments.

Is the hate warranted? I personally feel that all the “muh immersion” chuds are overreacting and if they care this much should just stick to corporate vtubers because they can’t break the immersion due to contractual obligations lol

The clip of the rant is here (clipped by someone else who seems to be against it, 11 minutes), the vtuber in question is Yukiwaru, not to promote her but to make it clear who I'm referring to.

She starts with saying she has gay friends and is fine if they don't make it their entire identitfy.

She thinks it's dumb for trans women to talk about having periods and get pregnant. Now some trans women defend this by saying they to have periodic pain from hormones and cramps, so it's a period. Yuki acknowledges the pain but says it makes no sense to call them "periods" as they don't bleed. She also mentions that trans women can't get pregnant, which I admit I can't find any counterarguments online.

Afterwards it gets more intense, where she says teachers shouldn't be teaching kids to be trans. She used herself as an example where she grew up as a tomboy. She said she would've transferred to a male if she was influenced by today's support for trans kids. She criticized the national museum for having sex toys in the LGBTQ+ section. Kids should not be "groomed" into thinking what they want. She then said "we should just go back to LGB" and that the + is just people's feelings.

She said a line should be drawn about trans women going into women's bathroom with kids. How you need to get their pronouns right otherwise you get crucified. How we need boundaries. She says how she has no rights as a straight white women.

Worst of all at the end she started playing League.

The takes on their own aren't too bad, but if you go on an entire rant like this, you shouldn't be too surprised to see consequences, there's a reason corpo vtubers don't say things like this.

Kirsche Verstahl has spend the last few days getting one guy'd by reddit, and continues to push false narratives by accusing anyone daring to criticize her as equating to wishing harm or fomenting hate mobs against her for her own words and actions. She claims her detractors make lies about her and deal in deceit, so rather than me telling you what Kirsche believes, let Kirsche tell you for herself in her own words. Not only will this post cover her recent comments unequivocally greenlighting and advocating support for harm against migrant women and children, even going as far as to defend the claims that got Asmongold banned (and it's my belief that anyone that champions his dangerous ideas should also be banned as he was because it breaks TOS), it will also cover several of the OTHER instances of violent rhetoric and disproven/evidence-lacking narratives she has pushed onto her audience. I am fascinated to see what kind of deflections or excuses Kirsche makes for her comments to avoid taking accountability, and it is my hope that this post can give better context to help you draw your own conclusions about her character. I want this to be the last post I make of her, and to that extent I made sure to give it the proper effort and primary sourcing it deserves. Ultimately it is my personal belief that Kirsche and her actions, comments, and rhetoric should be viewed as the canary in the coalmine: an early warning of what can happen when tolerance of intolerance becomes the norm and political violence/violent rhetoric becomes an acceptable school of thought.

Claim 1: Kirsche Verstahl accuses the left of constantly fomenting violence, yet regularly engages in violent rhetoric that she tries to subvert as extreme hyperbole to avoid accountability.

https://imgur.com/a/P4J9f2D

This image is a post from Kirsche Verstahl's twitter, where she defends the actions of Kenneth Darlington, a man in Panama that was arrested and found guilty of murder for shooting two climate activists that were part of a larger protest taking place on one of the country's highways. The government was well aware of the protests and had a hands off approach with it in order to minimize the chance for violence to occur. Kenneth Darlington is unquestionably the aggressor, which was also later confirmed by the footage of the incident and served as key evidence for his conviction. Kirsche will attempt to handwave this post and claim she never explicitly called for calls for violence nor did she celebrate it, however as you will soon see this kind of behavior from her is a pattern, using deflections to subvert the violent rhetoric she champions.

https://imgur.com/a/IOJfB4l

This is another post from Kirsche's twitter, celebrating Otoya Yamaguchi and reminding her audience to "remove commies before they subvert your nation". What kind of removal did Otoya Yamaguchi partake in that earned the praise and a day of celebration from Kirsche? He murdered the chair of the Socialist Party Inejiro Asanuma, quite literally celebrating the death of people she disagrees with politically. To give some more context as to who Otoya Yamaguchi was, he was a far-right, xenophobic, and ultranationalist extremist that believed in the restoration of the Japanese Empire, and furthermore belonged to the Greater Japan Patriotic Party. Bin Akao, Otoya's mentor and the founder of the Greater Japan Patriotic Party was a devout idolizer of Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussolini. Bin Akao actually went on to say many times that his movement was DIRECTLY inspired by Hitler and Mein Kampf. These teachings would eventually be passed down to Otoya Yamaguchi, who also famously praised Hitler and his work of Mein Kampf during police interrogations. It's all just edgy memes and jokes though!

https://imgur.com/a/Mgj1kOM

https://imgur.com/a/rZT6nUw

Kirsche states she wants Marxists removed root and stem. She will attempt to say this is hyperbole or that she did not mean it to come off as violent rhetoric, yet no matter how you spin this, the message itself is violent even if its intention isnt. This is because the metaphor quite literally describes killing a plant by pulling it out entirely, so using this phrase against people, ideas or groups carries the IMPLICIT threat of total destruction. But remember guys, saying this is violent and makes you feel unsafe actually means you are harassing Kirsche and making HER feel unsafe by calling her out on it.

Claim 2: Kirsche Verstahl regularly minimizes, jokes about, and shifts the responsibility of government brutality and the potential deaths that occur because of it onto the victims.

https://arazu.io/t3_1qm3co1/?timeframe=all&category=hot

Despite having little to no information or facts of the case when she made these statements, something she also alludes to in the clip, she instantly labels Alex Pretti as a dangerous revolutionary that was armed, violent, and sought to hurt ICE and police. She also goes as far as to say that he was not a victim and his murder was justified. This is a direct example of Kirsche pandering lies and false narratives, as actual VIDEO FOOTAGE and eyewitness testimony (INCLUDING THE WOMAN KIRSCHE CLAIMS HE WAS STRANGLING) shows that Alex Pretti was violently assaulted and shot for attempting to help Georgia Savageford stand up after she was forcefully thrown onto the ground by ICE for legally observing them. As you can clearly see from this video, Alex Pretti never reached for his gun, never approached the officers with any malicious intent, and was never violent with any of them even during the brutality he went through. She still stands by and defends these comments to this day despite quite literally lying and attempting to convince you not to believe what you see with your own eyes. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bkLd-6i8u70

https://packaged-media.redd.it/stdb4g9dudfg1/pb/m2-res_886p.mp4?m=DASHPlaylist.mpd&v=1&e=1786402800&s=760f8491b2c7f335cdb37b02b538933d300d98a3

https://imgur.com/a/LYnNj6e

Another instance of Kirsche trying to paint Alex Pretti as a dangerous Antifa terrorist looking to harm ICE officers, alluding that he was attempting to reach for something in his pocket when all video evidence suggests otherwise. The second video is one that I found pretty funny and ironic considering the videos and posts in this thread are clear demonstrations of her hypocrisy.

https://imgur.com/a/4piQjDZ

https://imgur.com/a/YfVMGCR

https://imgur.com/a/VhK7SNb

https://imgur.com/a/ahpzB50

Kirsche and her chat make fun of Alex Pretti's appearance, claiming he has the "physiognomy of a pedophile". While not literally accusing Alex Pretti of being a pedophile, claiming he looks like one carries the same harmful and social stigmas that falsely being labeled as a pedophile carries. Even using physiognomy, which is the idea that character, criminal inclinations, or moral depravity can be read from facial features is a malicious way of framing him as a person. Applying physiognomy in modern social commentary serves as a vehicle to project severe moral failings onto an individual's physical appearance without relying on objective evidence. Furthermore it serves to strip away empathy to make it seem like his extrajudicial killing is palatable or deserved. It's ironic that she engages in this kind of activity when she had VERY different feelings when Charlie Kirk was tragically murdered and people were celebrating, making jokes of, and even cheering for his passing. Kirsche clearly understands and recognizes how dehumanizing it is to make light of someone who passed (regardless of how much you truly disagree with and abhor their political beliefs), yet fails to extend that grace and attitude when it comes to people outside of her worldview. She even dabbles in a little bit of "woke cancel culture", harassing and doxing game devs because of their comments.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=js9O8XPDKd4

Claim 3: Kirsche Verstahl supports shooting immigrant women and children in order to create a deterrence.

Finally, on a more serious note, this leads us to what the original point of this post was about. To paint a clearer picture for context we need to go back to last week, when Asmongold was banned off of twitch for advocating for migrant women and children to be shot at our borders because in his words they are being used for emotional blackmail, and he even goes on to say that migrants are animals and savages. He calls this humanitarian crisis an invasion, and purposely uses this extremist framing in order to create a permission structure for his advocacy of violence against the "others", which in this case is woman and children seeking asylum/migrants. Despite having no empirical evidence for any of his claims, he also suggests that migrants would rather willingly come illegally than through legal processes, despite the fact that every reputable source on the matter tells a polar opposite story. Once again, by framing a humanitarian crisis an invasion of "military aged men" he is trying (and horribly failing) to frame this issue as one that requires force, violence, and death.

https://youtu.be/Qycx1py6d2U

In this clip Kirsche reacts to Asmongold's take and pauses to talk about hypothetical circumstances in which military forces use women and children as human shields in order to play into the morality of not wanting to harm innocent civilians. Because of this, she argues that while it's a morally reprehensible thing to do, making the tough choice of using lethality will deter the tactic from continuing. This is fine and all, but comparing a humanitarian immigration crisis to military warfare tactics is a non-starter for several reasons.

1. It dehumanizes civilians: By reframing unarmed migrants as an "invading army," individual human beings, which includes children and families, are stripped of their status as non-combatants. Once a population is categorized as an "enemy force," standard moral and legal obligations to protect civilian life are stripped away in the eyes of the public.

2. It lowers the threshold for lethal violence: In military engagement, collateral damage is often treated as a tragic, inherent reality of neutralizing a military threat. Shifting that logic to border control removes the presumption of innocence. It argues that killing non-combatants or children is an acceptable "necessary evil" to achieve a political or territorial goal, effectively normalizing state-sanctioned violence against civilians.

3. It prepares the public for extreme measures: When a humanitarian or civil issue is framed as an existential military threat or even a "mass invasion", it triggers a wartime survival mindset. Under this mindset, normal democratic processes, legal rights, and human rights standards are treated as luxuries that can be discarded. This rhetoric has historically paved the way for severe human rights abuses and vigilantism.

4. It creates a false dichotomy: This framing presents a false choice: either use catastrophic, lethal force against entire groups (including women and children), or face total destruction. By erasing non-lethal, administrative, and legal options for managing borders, it makes extreme violence appear as the only logical and permissible solution.

Ironically enough, Kirsche also recognizes the situation in Morocco or other humanitarian immigration crises in general are NOT the same as her hypothetical situation, BUT she still frames it as an invading force anyway in order to create the notion that somehow the two situations ARE still comparable and therefore violence IS PERMISSIBLE.

https://youtu.be/oc6vz5kXIv4

After laying the groundwork, she goes on to further agree with Asmongold that immigrants are using women and children as human shields, despite there being no proof of this. She also goes on to list several other wild claims, of which there are too many for me to debunk. In short however: "illegal immigrants" and asylum seekers that are still waiting for application approval DO NOT qualify for welfare programs in 99% of situations (being extremely rare outlier cases), they do indeed pay taxes, and the idea of America being a welfare magnet is a largely debunked and disproven idea. The only people in America granted welfare after seeking asylum are asylees who have already been approved through the formal process, so it seems like her rhetoric is actually targeting legal immigrants, since there is no basis in any reality for the claim that non approved asylum seekers are granted benefits. More importantly, these ideas are not only dangerous, they also directly attack the Universal Declaration of Human Rights which was signed after World War II as a direct response to the Holocaust (though the other horrific atrocities that occurred during the war also played a part). Article 14 officially recognized the right to seek and enjoy asylum from persecution in other countries, which ultimately established international protection as a fundamental human right. More importantly however is Article 3 which establishes the right to life, as well as Article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights which protects every human beings inherent right to life. It goes on to state that this right must be protected by law and that no person shall be arbitrarily deprived of their life. It is a supreme, non-derogable right that cannot be suspended even during public emergencies. If Kirsche truly believes in what she says, it's something that goes against all established norms for human decency.

Ultimately I hope you found this post informative, and just to cover my bases once again (because I seemingly have to out of respect for Kirsche's fear for her life) please do not take this post as permission or an endorsement of going out of your way to harass or threaten physical harm against her. Making comments that she can potentially twist as being threatening will only detract from the importance of the conversation.

2 users are getting spammed and attacked because of yukis bullshit and actually LEFT Twitter because of it.

Vid context https://youtu.be/Zc7IKynIMBU?is=YTSir7HtsDiZFY5T

anf FYI: CAT was getting attacked on Twitter after confronting Yuki

I won't link the video as I assume no one here wants to give Chibi any more views. I watched the video twice and will summarize some points and accompany some relevant screenshots so people can know what the video is about without giving Chibi views. I hope this doesn't infringe copyright as the original work is non-fictional, journalism, so I'm just relaying statements Chibi made and what events he's talking about.

Everything here is alleged, it's possible that while I'm just trying to relay information, I may be misinterpreting what people are saying. Also seems like some of AkafoxVT's tweets have been deleted so I can't link them, but Chibi has them screenshotted if you really want to see them.

So akaFoxVT once called Chibi a pedophile for liking loli content, as least the "gooning to art of kids and shit" part seems to imply that. There was a whole debate on Twitter where defense for AkafoxVT were that she was 19 and it was 17 years ago, AkafoxVT talked about it here.

Chibi Reviews dropped a hot take that trans kids is grooming and that anyone who supports trans kids should go to prison. This was in response to the tweet from Nyara (2nd image)

Bint claims he didn't know about Akafox's charges. Chibi claims Bint is lying by showing akaFoxVT interacting with him on Twitter and chatting on Bint's vtuber persona. If you ask me this doesn't prove anything, just shows that they interacted, nothing about Bint knowing anything. Chibi himself stated that AkaFox was outed only in May 2026, and attached screenshots of the 2 interacting before then, so I really don't know what he's trying to prove. The only part that might be lying was Bint claiming they didn't know until June, but that's like only 1 month and maybe Bint really didn't know. Chibi claims that Bint only unfollowed Akafox the morning the latter was arrested, which Chibi used to assert that Bint lied. I'm not sure if this can be proven.

He then focused on Nyara engaging with akaFoxVT about trans kids, once again repeatedly saying how it's grooming (I can't find aka's reply, only Nyara's tweet. Chibi has a screenshot of them talking).

Nyara asked for proof about a claim that they interacted with akaFox many times before and some gave examples of them interacting. Now Nyara's wording wasn't clear, maybe she wanted proof that they interacted "a lot", which is vague. I will give Nyara an L here as she just showed that akaFox never mentioned the word "Nyara" in any of her tweets, when interactions can happen without mentioning names. She should've just stood on her not knowing akaFox was a registered sex offender until everyone else did in May 2026.

Nyara then showed that they never DMed and here's where Chibi comes in. Chibi mentioned that you can deleted your DMs. Then asserted that it was a complete lie because Nyara once said "my DMs are open". It is possible that they never actually DMed, but Chibi said that if that was the only comment on akaFox's tweet then it shows a close relationship and they certainty DMed. Chibi then showed a large list of interactions between akaFox and Nyara, with Bint joining in. The list was given by SuperGrok.

Chibi criticized Nyara for spending more time "sweeping" than condemning akaFox. Chibi also pointed an interaction where NyaraVT and akaFoxVT saying lolicon is gross, something that goes against the norm of vtubing. Chibi then repeated that NyaraVT wants to "groom and turns kids trans".

Chibi claims victory by saying "the people who try to get me to end my life are people with skeletons in their closet and are probably actively harming people" (I shortened it)

Overall Chibi pisses me off, but I'm also a little wary of NyaraVT for her take on lolicon. My thoughts on Bint have not changed.

If you really want to watch his video, I won't link it, but the title is "Exposing a P*do and Their Defenders That Have Slandered Me for 2 Years".

EDIT 1: Nyara has responded in the comments

>To clarify: I asked for proof that we were “good friends.” I know we interacted till mid 2025 and I followed her because I follow many trans content creators.

>We were never Discord friends and afaik she wasn’t in my Discord server. I don’t really recall many of the interactions because it never went beyond some Twitter posts.

>Claiming we were “close” is just ridiculous and I wanted them to proof this, but it was misrepresented to push the idea that I was lying.

>I also had no idea Aka was exposed a few months ago. I never had anyone trustworthy reach out to me directly and I even thought this was just another “trans woman gets randomly accused because she is anti-lolicon” situation until I saw Bint post about it.

>I feel disgusted that an actual pedo interacted with me like this and it sucks how Chibi just made this about me and Bint.

>But I find it interesting how he did exactly what I called him out for in my initial tweet.

>If there’s still anything unclear lmk.

Why do all these fuckers fall for “scammy mcperson’s figure company” and then fail to warn their peers? Lmao, it isn’t until way later that they all go “oh yea they were shady” and by that point their fans and peers are out thousands

Kirsche Verstahl recently responded to a post I made regarding her and attempted to create a false equivalency narrative live on stream to an audience of thousands (good thing it was all recorded) , claiming I am alluding to calls for violence despite no such evidence existing. She deflects her criticisms by saying the post is engaging in false truths and lies. Not even a mere two hours after ego surfing and talking over the person making the arguments rather than to them, she proceeds to hop onto Kiwi Farms and showcase a live doxx page of someone she found from an episode of financial audit. Hypocrisy like this speaks to itself and showcases how dangerously OP lying is, especially when its someone like her. She clearly demonstrates that she does not care about the safety of others and only pulls the victim card when the noise is too loud. TO BE CLEAR: Kirsche herself DID NOT create the doxx, she IS HOWEVER participating in it by showing it to her audience.

Edit: I was dm'ed that you were watching this thread again, thats actually hilarious! Who is farming who? The no name Andy that managed to one guy you two days in a row despite you continously talking around the points rather than to them? OR the person with an actual following and platform that cant seem to stop letting a nobody from living rent free in their head? Oh yeah in case it wasn't clear by the way, PLEASE DONT THREATEN AND HARM KIRSCHE 🥺. She lives in a state of constant paranoia and will assume anyone that says "Kirsche bad" is a radical leftist marxist communist socialist hamas houthi loving terrorist 🫪.