r/WebScrapingInsider

How Do You Choose The Best Residential Proxy Provider? AMA with Stan Sadokov from NodeMaven
▲ 25 r/WebScrapingInsider+3 crossposts

How Do You Choose The Best Residential Proxy Provider? AMA with Stan Sadokov from NodeMaven

Hey everyone,

I'm Ian Kerins, CEO & Co-Founder of ScrapeOps.io.

After four great AMAs with the r/WebScrapingInsider community, we're excited to bring you our fifth guest.

This Thursday, August 20, at 10:30 AM GMT+3, we'll be joined by Stan Sadokov from NodeMaven for a discussion around one of the questions almost every serious scraping operation eventually has to deal with:

How do you actually choose the right residential proxy provider?

NodeMaven is a proxy infrastructure provider focused on residential, mobile, and ISP IPs, with an emphasis on IP quality rather than simply advertising the biggest pool.

Instead of relying purely on massive raw IP counts, NodeMaven uses real-time quality filtering to identify and remove flagged or low-reputation IPs before they cause problems for customers.

WebScrapingInsider AMA #5 with NodeMaven

During the AMA, we can dig into topics like:

  • Residential proxy quality
  • How proxy providers measure IP reputation
  • Choosing between residential, mobile and ISP proxies
  • IP rotation vs. sticky sessions
  • Proxy success rates and why they vary by target
  • Detecting and removing bad IPs
  • Proxy performance for large-scale web scraping
  • How proxy pricing actually works
  • What to look for when evaluating a proxy provider
  • Where residential proxy infrastructure is heading

We've had some great discussions in the community so far:

Our first AMA covered proxy infrastructure, Cloudflare bypass, browser automation, and scaling scrapers.

Our second with WebClaw explored AI agents, hidden APIs, open source scraping, and LLMs.

Our third with CloakBrowser went deep on stealth Chromium, fingerprinting, anti-bot detection, and browser automation.

Our latest with Browser Use brought insights on browser agents, AI-powered scraping, proxies, evaluations, and browser infrastructure.

We're excited to keep the conversation going.

If you're building web scrapers, data pipelines, browser automation, account management systems, or proxy infrastructure, or you're simply trying to figure out why one proxy provider works better than another, this should be a good one.

Drop your questions below, and Stan Sadokov from NodeMaven and I will start answering them during the AMA.

Looking forward to seeing everyone there!

Ian

reddit.com
u/ian_k93 — 1 day ago

Which is the best web scraping API for e-commerce sites?

I'm looking for a web scraping API for a SaaS that will primarily scrape Amazon, along with some Walmart data and a few smaller e-commerce websites. We'll probably add more retailers over time, so I need something that works reliably across a broad range of domains.

I have been comparing providers like Bright Data, Zyte, ScrapingBee, ScraperAPI, and Scrape.do, but the pricing is difficult to compare.

Its not just that the prices shown on their pricing pages are different. The effective cost also seems to vary significantly depending on the website being scraped. Some APIs use more credits for particular domains, premium proxies, JavaScript rendering, etc.

Ideally, I want the cheapest API that still performs reliably across all our target websites. I don't want to save money on Amazon only to discover that the same provider is expensive or unreliable on Walmart and the smaller sites.

Is there one web scraping API that offers consistently good price-to-performance across different e-commerce domains, or do you generally need to use multiple providers?

reddit.com
u/Alice_5433 — 1 day ago
▲ 2 r/WebScrapingInsider+1 crossposts

How would you architect a highly scalable system for many independent recurring searches?

I’m designing a system where many users can create their own independent search agents.
Each agent has its own search criteria and runs periodically to retrieve fresh results.
The challenge is that every user can have multiple agents, and each agent can perform multiple different searches. As the number of users grows, the number of individual searches grows very quickly.
I need the searches to remain independent and reasonably real-time, while also preventing the system from becoming overloaded as the number of users and agents increases.
How would you architect the scheduling and execution layer for this kind of system so that it can scale to a very large number of users and recurring searches?
I’m particularly interested in how you would approach scheduling, concurrency, backpressure, and prioritization without letting a traditional queue grow indefinitely.

reddit.com
u/Private_Tank — 1 day ago

At what point did you stop building scrapers and just pay for an API?

Trying to get a read on where people actually draw the build-vs-buy line in 2026, because it feels like it's moved.

for context, the tradeoff as I see it: rolling your own gives you control and lower per-request cost, but you eat all the maintenance when targets change, anti-bot shifts, proxies get flagged. paying for a scraping API or managed service hands off the headache but the cost scales with volume and you're stuck with whatever they support.

what I'm curious about from people running this at real scale:

where's your actual cutover? like, is it volume, is it how hostile the target is, is it just not having the headcount to maintain scrapers?

for the stuff you still build yourself, what makes it worth keeping in-house?

and for anyone who went the other way and moved off managed APIs back to building, what pushed you back?

Mostly wondering if the "just build it" default has shifted now that the managed options got better, or if at scale it still always comes back to owning your own stack.

reddit.com
u/shasedoge — 2 days ago

Looking for a pay-as-you-go social-data alternative for web scraping

I'm building a workflow that pulls public data from several social platforms. How do you differentiate a focused API against a general scraping platform for this?

I want to avoid a recurring monthly subscription, a separate scraper for every platform while keeping the costs predictable when usage changes.

reddit.com
u/ManyStuffed — 2 days ago

Should I use social media APIs or a general scraper?

When you need public data from TikTok, Instagram, YouTube, or other social platforms, how do you decide between platform-specific APIs and a general web-scraping tool ?

Right now I’m thinking about integration , reliability, platform coverage, customization, and whether I might need to scrape regular websites later.

reddit.com
u/EggMonsterMash — 1 day ago
▲ 4 r/WebScrapingInsider+3 crossposts

How to find your public and local IP address (on all platforms)

Figured it'd be useful to share some basics for anyone just getting into proxies. Starting with the simplest one, finding your IP.

Public IP is easy. Search "what is my IP" on Google and it shows up right at the top.

Local IP depends on the device.

  • Windows: run `ipconfig` in Command Prompt
  • macOS: System Settings > Network > your active connection
  • iPhone: Settings > Wi-Fi > tap the info icon next to your network
  • Android: Wi-Fi settings > gear icon next to the connected network

The quick difference between the two is that your public IP is your network as the internet sees it; the local IP is one device inside it. You'll run into both when setting up a printer, remote access, or troubleshooting a connection.

Hope that helps!

reddit.com
u/MikeProxyCheap — 3 days ago

Best static residential IP service?

Preferably one that has never been used.

But don't want to pay 100s of dollars.

I think Evomi has one but not sure it compares to other offers out there.

Who has one and is happy with it?

reddit.com
u/dhruvkar — 5 days ago

How and what do i need to learn to scrape from vinted

Right now i am mkaing a vinted tool scraping displaying and more, thats not the point but how do i learn the stuff like maby proxies, idk what type of scraping if its for multiple people from a server and the other stuff i need pls help me !

reddit.com
u/Puzzled_Finance_4982 — 4 days ago

What’s the best web extraction tool in 2026? I tested Firecrawl, Tavily & Jina Reader

I needed something reliable to pull web content into an AI workflow, so I tested the 3 tools I kept running into: Firecrawl, Tavily and Jina

I used the exact same 100 URLs for each one. The mix was pretty random on purpose:

i) docs/blog posts ii) ecommerce pages iii) JS-heavy sites iv) landing pages v) tables and longer pages vi) a few annoying sites that usually break scrapers

I just wanted to know: if I give this thing a URL, how often do I get back something clean enough that I can actually use without scraping the page again myself?

So the test was pretty simple:

  1. Run the same 100 URLs through each tool.
  2. Check if the main content was there.
  3. Check if the output had a bunch of garbage mixed in.
  4. Count it as successful only if I could use the result directly in my workflow.

Results:

Firecrawl: 93/100 usable Tavily: 87/100 usable Jina Reader: 77/100 usable

Firecrawl was the most consistent overall. It handled most of the heavy stuff better and I had fewer cases where important parts of the page were missing. I also like that I can get Markdown for normal pages and use JSON extraction when I only need specific fields

Tavily was pretty close. Extraction itself worked well on most normal pages Jina was ok for articles/docs where I just wanted URL to clean Markdown, it worked great. It started falling behind more on the weird/dynamic pages in my set.

Obviously 100 URLs isn't a big benchmark and the results will change depending on what you're scraping,

u/onlyleftusername4me — 9 days ago

Is web scraping legal? Looking for an up-to-date viewpoint

I've read some articles on the legality of web scraping but most are pretty out of date at this stage. So I'm interested to hear if there are any changes on the question is web scraping legal or not.

Appreciate any input and insights. Preferably from experts not just keyboard warriors.

reddit.com
u/Previous_Town3598 — 9 days ago
▲ 11 r/WebScrapingInsider+5 crossposts

Screen scraping vs. web scraping: when you actually need OCR

The tricky thing with screen scraping is that most people reach for it when they don't need it.

The difference

Web scraping reads a page's HTML or an API. The data arrives already structured, tags and values you can grab directly. Screen scraping reads what's rendered on screen, so the data arrives as pixels and you need OCR to turn it back into text.

https://preview.redd.it/ovo6pbl07zih1.png?width=903&format=png&auto=webp&s=9fe453509e0405de1b4051afc1392b7d5a4458fe

Why the extra step matters

More stages means more places for things to break, and OCR errors are sneaky. In a quick test with Tesseract, clean text read at 100% accuracy, but a slightly low-res capture hit 96% and still flipped a price from 1299.00 to 2299.00. A blurry one turned a 4.6 rating into 46. The headline accuracy looks fine while single digits quietly corrupt your dataset.

When to actually use it

If the data exists in the HTML or an API, parse that. Screen scraping is for when it genuinely only exists visually, like prices rendered as images, embedded charts, scanned PDFs, or legacy terminal systems with no API at all.

If you do go the OCR route

Capture tight regions instead of full pages. If the number you need sits in one panel, screenshot that panel. Less noise means cleaner OCR output, and small layout changes elsewhere won't break your job.

https://preview.redd.it/m7zo8tj17zih1.png?width=970&format=png&auto=webp&s=08c196ae71b80971a0fc1368691f3b9ec11c6337

Validate output against expected formats, especially numbers. Don't trust raw OCR text for anything that ends up in a dataset.

For JS-heavy pages, render in a headless browser first, then capture. A plain HTTP request to a single-page app returns an empty shell.

One last thing

Budget for maintenance. A code-level parser breaks when the markup changes, a screen scraper breaks when the layout changes, and layouts change more often.

Curious if anyone here has run OCR pipelines at scale, and how you handle validation for numeric fields.

reddit.com
u/MikeProxyCheap — 8 days ago

For small projects, what self-service scraping APIs are you using?

I have been checking on managed scraping APIs for a small project, but there's obviously a gap between wanting a reliable anti-bot bypass and getting handed a full enterprise data platform with a procurement process attached.

The project is a job board and some e-commerce, all behind Cloudflare. Maybe a few hundred thousand pages a month. What I care about is how fast I can get the first successful request out, what a request costs after retries and blocks, and whether I can scale up without a sales call or KYC.

Bright Data is the obvious heavyweight, and I'm not arguing with that. If I needed SERP at scale or SOC 2, I'd pay them and move on. But for job boards behind Cloudflare, it feels like a little too much.

So I've been poking at the self-service tiers of a few tools, like Scrapfly, ScraperAPI, and Zenrows. They all skip the sales-call part, but the billing models are more different than I expected, especially around whether failed requests count against you.

Anyone running a small workload somewhat like this? If yes, what are you using, and how has that been working out for you?

reddit.com
u/InsideDebt6345 — 9 days ago
▲ 12 r/WebScrapingInsider+2 crossposts

We launched Proxy Tester by ScrapeOps on Product Hunt 🚀

And it's already Featured 😄

https://www.producthunt.com/products/proxy-benchmark-by-scrapeops

We’d love your support 👍

Proxy Tester is a free tool that benchmarks 20+ proxy providers against the URL you actually want to scrape.

Over the last few months we've been using it internally and sharing it with early users to help answer one of the most common questions in web scraping:

Which proxy provider should I use?

One thing we've learned is that there really isn't a universal answer.

A provider that performs brilliantly on one target can struggle on another.

A provider with the highest success rate might not be the most cost-effective.

And many "best proxy provider" rankings don't reflect the website you're actually trying to scrape.

That's why we built Proxy Tester to benchmark providers against real target URLs and compare:

✅ Success Rate

✅ Latency

✅ Estimated Cost

✅ Value Score

✅ Provider Rankings

The feedback so far has been really useful and has already influenced how we're thinking about future benchmark reports, provider coverage, and scoring methodologies.

Today we're taking the next step and launching it on Product Hunt.

If you'd like to support the launch, leave feedback, or tell us what we're missing, we'd genuinely appreciate it.

🚀 Product Hunt:
https://www.producthunt.com/products/proxy-benchmark-by-scrapeops

🔧 Proxy Tester:
https://scrapeops.io/proxy-providers/tester/

🎥 1-Minute Demo:
https://youtu.be/GR67AIWkPn0

One question for the community:

How are you currently evaluating proxy providers?

  • Trial accounts?
  • Internal benchmarks?
  • Recommendations?
  • Something else?

Would love to hear how others approach this problem.

u/Kabhishek92 — 11 days ago

Is eBay scraping hard ?

Hello everyone I am working on an utility tool (tcg scanner like collectr and price charting) and I need to fetch daily prices of 8000 cards on eBay with with different variations such as Raw , PSA 8 9 10 .. which makes it 40000 request , did anyone work on something like this or is there any services that gets data from eBay with this amount ?

reddit.com
u/TinyLife2939 — 13 days ago
▲ 16 r/WebScrapingInsider+4 crossposts

[Dataset] 6M job postings with skills, salary, seniority, location facets — from an open-source job aggregator

I run freehire, an open-source job aggregator that ingests postings from dozens of ATS platforms (Greenhouse, Lever, Ashby, Workday, etc.), normalizes them into one schema, and runs each through a facet pipeline.

Just exported the whole catalogue to Hugging Face: freehire-jobs — 6,041,471 postings.

Each row is a raw posting (title, company, description, URL, source, posted_at) plus derived facets:

- Dictionary-only (deterministic, no LLM): skills, seniority, category, work_mode, posting_language, employment_type, education_level, english_level, experience_years_min

- Dictionary-first, LLM-filled: countries, regions, cities

- LLM-only: salary_min/max, currency, period — pay is stated in every format imaginable, no dictionary handles that

Company rows carry their own facets too (industries, HQ country, size, YC batch/stage where applicable).

Format: 20 gzip JSONL shards, split by row range for easy streaming/resuming.

Backstory: I originally wanted to train a cheap classifier for seniority/category tagging instead of paying for an LLM call per job. Turned out the dictionary+LLM pipeline already in prod beats a from-scratch classifier by enough that finishing the classifier wasn't worth it — so I'm sharing the data instead.

reddit.com
u/Dry-Library-8484 — 13 days ago

Best github for scraping reddit.com?

Since May and the old reddit almost gone, what are currently the best libs on reddit?
What is your favorite?
I want to scrape all the posts of my top favorite 100 (small) subreddits and sort them by AI to delete AI slop + self promotion and really only get the interesting posts for me to read.

What do you suggest?

reddit.com
u/stvaccount — 11 days ago

Browser Use vs Playwright in 2026: When Should You Use an AI Browser Agent?

Browser Use and Playwright solve browser automation in fundamentally different ways.

Playwright executes deterministic scripts written in advance. Browser Use gives an AI agent a goal and lets it decide how to complete it.

So when should you use each?

We recently hosted an AMA with the Browser Use team covering Browser Use vs Playwright, direct CDP automation, model costs, reliability, stealth, evaluation and the future of browser agents.

Here are the main takeaways.

The Short Answer

Use Playwright when:

  • The workflow is known and stable
  • You repeatedly extract the same data
  • The website does not change frequently
  • Speed and determinism matter
  • You are running high-volume automation

Use Browser Use when:

  • The workflow is open-ended or difficult to define in advance
  • The website changes regularly
  • The agent must adapt to unexpected states
  • The task involves authentication, multiple websites or multiple steps
  • Development and maintenance time matter more than raw execution speed

But there is now a third approach emerging: coding agents that write browser code directly against Chrome’s DevTools Protocol.

Why Browser Use Moved Away From Playwright

Browser Use originally relied on Playwright underneath its agent layer.

The team eventually replaced it with its own browser layer built directly on Chrome DevTools Protocol.

The reason was control.

Removing Playwright gave them more freedom over browser functions, fewer abstraction layers and the ability to let agents write CDP code dynamically when they encounter unusual edge cases.

Their newer BrowserCode approach takes this further.

Instead of receiving a simplified page representation and selecting predefined actions, the agent explores the browser and writes the low-level code it needs.

According to the team, strong models now:

  • Rarely rely on screenshots
  • Inspect pages through code
  • Discover internal APIs
  • Execute JavaScript shortcuts
  • Extract only the information needed
  • Complete some tasks faster than a human could

Browser Use says it now uses BrowserCode for almost everything because it is cheaper, faster and more capable.

The exception is website QA. BrowserCode actively looks for shortcuts, while the original Browser Use agent is constrained to click, type and navigate more like a human. That makes the human-style agent better at finding interface bugs a real user would encounter.

Stateful Agents vs One-Shot Scripts

One simple AI automation approach is to ask an LLM to write a Playwright script, run it and return any errors for the model to fix.

That works well for predictable workflows.

The limitation is that the script must anticipate the whole task before it starts.

A stateful agent works differently:

  1. Inspect the current browser state
  2. Choose or write the next action
  3. Execute it
  4. Verify the result
  5. Recover or change direction if necessary
  6. Continue until the task is complete

This makes agents better suited to websites and workflows where the exact path cannot be known in advance.

However, Playwright still has a major advantage: speed.

If you already know exactly what should happen, a deterministic script can execute the same workflow far faster than an agent reasoning between every step.

Cost Is Becoming Less Important

Browser Use estimates that the cost of completing an agent task has fallen roughly 50x since it started 18 months ago.

Its current estimates include:

  • A typical ten-step task costs around $0.01 to $0.02 using a low-cost model
  • A successful agent run can be converted into a reusable script
  • Repeating the script can cost fractions of a cent
  • Scraping 15 Hacker News posts, comments and linked pages, then summarising them into a poster, costs around $0.05

These are Browser Use’s own numbers, but they point to an important change.

The cost gap between AI agents and conventional automation is shrinking. The bigger remaining disadvantage is latency.

The team believes current models are becoming reliable and cheap enough for production, but they are still slow to watch in real time.

The Best Production Stack May Be Hybrid

The most practical pattern may not be choosing Browser Use or Playwright for everything.

Instead:

  1. Give the agent a goal
  2. Let it discover and complete the workflow
  3. Have it save the successful process as reusable code
  4. Run the deterministic version for repeated tasks
  5. Bring the agent back when the workflow changes or fails

This gives you adaptability during discovery and speed during repetition.

The agent solves and maintains the workflow. The script executes the stable parts cheaply and quickly.

Persistent Browser Identity Still Matters

AI does not remove the usual browser-automation problems.

For authenticated sites and social platforms, Browser Use recommends treating each browser profile as one persistent identity containing:

  • One fingerprint
  • One cookie jar
  • Local storage
  • Login state
  • Ideally, one stable IP and location

Its cloud profiles preserve the same fingerprint, cookies and local storage between sessions. The default proxy IP, however, is not guaranteed to remain constant.

For sensitive accounts, the team recommends a dedicated, non-shared residential IP with a low fraud score.

Creating new social accounts is also considerably harder than automating existing, established accounts.

Evaluation Is Still Difficult

Live websites are noisy.

Pages change. Browsers crash. IP quality fluctuates. CAPTCHAs appear inconsistently. A single successful run tells you very little about whether an agent is genuinely reliable.

Browser Use evaluates agents by:

  • Running realistic tasks on live websites
  • Defining verified success rubrics
  • Using an LLM judge to assess results
  • Repeating thousands of tasks
  • Averaging out browser and website flakiness

Internally, it records model inputs, outputs, reasoning, latency, token usage, caching, browser actions, screenshots and infrastructure logs.

One particularly interesting research takeaway from the AMA was that better verifiers may be more important than better action generation.

If you cannot reliably determine whether an unpredictable browser task succeeded, it is difficult to train agents through reinforcement learning.

Security Should Be Designed First

Browser Use’s main recommendation for anyone building a browser agent from scratch was to begin with sandboxing.

Permanent LLM credentials should not be stored inside the worker where the agent executes browser code.

Instead:

  • Store permanent credentials on a separate control plane
  • Give the worker a short-lived key
  • Proxy all model calls through the control plane
  • Treat the worker as disposable and potentially hostile

This gives agents the freedom to execute code without exposing permanent API credentials.

Agents Still Struggle With Taste

Browser agents are already effective at quantifiable tasks:

  • Finding the cheapest flight
  • Comparing prices
  • Extracting structured information
  • Completing defined workflows

They remain much weaker at subjective decisions such as choosing the right restaurant, hotel or holiday for a particular person.

The agent can retrieve every option and still recommend something that feels obviously wrong to a human who understands the user.

Browser Use described this as poor taste and a weak understanding of the social world.

Bottom Line: Browser Use or Playwright?

There is no universal winner.

Playwright wins when the workflow is stable, repetitive and performance-sensitive.

Browser Use wins when the task is dynamic, open-ended or expensive to define and maintain manually.

Direct CDP coding agents may be the next step, giving models enough freedom to inspect the browser, write custom code, find shortcuts and recover from edge cases.

The emerging production stack looks less like agents replacing scripts and more like:

Agent discovers the workflow → code executes it repeatedly → agent repairs it when it breaks.

That may be the real answer to Browser Use vs Playwright.

👉 Read the full Browser Use AMA and all the answers here.

What are you using in production: Playwright, Browser Use, a hybrid stack or direct CDP?

u/ian_k93 — 13 days ago