r/ai_trading

BTC -- 33 Weeks
▲ 30 r/ai_trading+16 crossposts

BTC -- 33 Weeks

Bitcoin / U.S. Dollar

Measuring from the all time high to May 24^(th) Pentecost/Feast of Weeks/Shavuot.

This is a 50-day count from Resurrection Sunday April 5^(th) and is a highly possible day of the Rapture.

With Biblical knowledge, we can unpack the chart to reveal the story.

The money knows before the event. Biblically, we know that Judas was paid to betray Jesus.

Luke 22:3-6 Then entered Satan into Judas surnamed Iscariot, being of the number of the twelve. And he went his way, and communed with the chief priests and captains, how he might betray Him unto them. And they were glad, and covenanted to give him money. And he promised, and sought opportunity to betray Him unto them in the absence of the multitude.

u/Then_Marionberry_259 — 10 hours ago

Finally fully automated

This finally works, and it’s now fully automated.

I know it’s too early to celebrate, but after 8 days of trying to find both the problem and the solution, I finally made it fully automated. The next step is adding Telegram alerts for every trade it takes, so I can use it on prop accounts as well.

I’m super excited about this. Even if I fail, I still loved every second of the process.

Right now, it’s at 7/9 full TP trades. I didn’t set a break-even function yet, and I probably won’t. And 2/9L

As for the small losing trades — those were just tests to see whether the code worked or not. I had a very hard time figuring out how to make everything fully automated, which is why there are several negative trades.

The last 3 trades are all from my bot.

2L and 7W for now.

u/Temporary_Fun_7973 — 13 hours ago
▲ 32 r/ai_trading+1 crossposts

I let AI build and run my trading strategy for 60 days without touching it. Here's the completely honest result not what you'd expect.

I want to give an honest account of this because most AI trading posts here are either too positive or too negative.

What I did:

  • Described my trading logic in plain English to an AI
  • Let it translate that into a systematic, rule-based strategy
  • Ran it on paper trading for 30 days, then live for 30 days
  • Did not touch it or override it during the entire period

Paper trading result: up 8.3%. My manual account over the same period: flat.

Live trading result: up 3.1%. My manual account over the same 30 days: down 1.4%.

What surprised me most: the AI strategy made MORE trades than I would have manually, but each individual trade was SMALLER. My manual trading was the opposite fewer trades, but I was sizing up when I felt "confident" (which is just another word for recency bias after a few wins in a row).

One month of live data means nothing statistically. I know that.

But the emotional experience was genuinely different. I wasn't stressed. I wasn't watching every candle. I checked in twice a day instead of every 20 minutes.

I don't know if this is repeatable. I'm going to run it for another 90 days and post an update.

Anyone else doing something similar? What have you actually found?

reddit.com
u/Important_Buy626 — 14 hours ago

Claude opus 4.6 + 4.7 on EURUSD, 60 days live. Win rate 64% TP1 / 57% TP2 / 43% TP3 at 1.1R / 1.7R / 2.5R with dynamic strategies in real time. Yes, it can trade...

quick follow up to my last post since a bunch of you asked specifically about EURUSD. ran the system live for 60 days, 183 sessions, 14 trades. 64% TP1 at 1.1R, 57% TP2 at 1.7R, 43% TP3 at 2.5R.

the part i actually want to talk about is how the macro and trend agents feed into the EURUSD-specific trader. macro agent runs the desk view. DXY direction, session bias, what oil/gold/VIX are saying, what came out of the london/NY handoff. trend agent runs pure structure on EURUSD itself, the CMT array, VWAP behavior across sessions, where the session high/low is sitting relative to the prior day, and has access to the macro agent output. neither one calls the trade. they hand a packaged read to the EURUSD trader and the trader builds the thesis from scratch each session.

strategies aren't hardcoded. the trader builds the play based on what the agents handed it, volatility, liquidity, momentum structure, session conditions. so in theory every trade should look different. in practice there's a pattern and it's been bugging me.

across the 14 trades it keeps converging on three setups. pullback into trend after VWAP reclaim. fade the session high into prior-day resistance. mean reversion off session support when macro reads flat. not exotic, textbook desk patterns. brilliant in the sense that a seasoned trader would nod at all three. but i didn't tell it to prefer them. it found them on its own from a much wider menu of plays it could have built. i keep going back to the journals trying to figure out if it's converging because those three actually fit EURUSD's character at this volatility regime, or because something in the agent handoff is biasing it toward mean-reversion-flavored structure. honestly don't know yet.

the other thing i'm sitting with is the rejection rate. every session the agents produce roughly 1.8 setups on average, so across 183 sessions that's somewhere around 330 candidate trades the system built and monitored. only 14 made it through to execution. that's a 96% rejection rate against considered setups, or about 92% against sessions. that's not the trader being lazy, it's the trader being patient. it builds the thesis, watches conditions evolve in real time, and waits for the confluences to actually line up. if they don't, the setup expires. control like that was the thing i wasn't sure an LLM could hold session after session.

not going to dump the full conflict resolution logic in this post for length, but the short version is the trend agent sees the macro agent's read before it builds its own. one-way visibility. trader sees both and gets to weight. all of it running on live real-time data, full CMT indicator array (RSI, MACD, ATR, VWAP, session H/L, S/R, fibs across 5m/15m/60m), macro context (DXY, VIX, oil, gold, yields, ADD), built around the way a chartered market technician would actually frame a session. early data says the asymmetry matters more than i expected. ask away if you want to get into how the model logic is built inside.

4.7 only has 2 trades on it so i'm not calling that a comparison. ask me at session 300.

u/The_AI_Trader — 20 hours ago
▲ 68 r/ai_trading+3 crossposts

President Trump jokes he may run for Prime Minister of Israel after leaving office.

u/Nicolit1 — 1 day ago
▲ 16 r/ai_trading+1 crossposts

Built a drawdown monitor across portfolios (since broker apps can't do it). Turns out the math is easy, the deposit/withdrawal detection isn't.

I realized there's a basic problem: Broker apps don't let us set alerts on a % variation of our balance. And if we use multiple brokers (most active traders do), there's no way to monitor drawdown across the whole portfolio. So I built one.

What I have working so far: Every minute, the agent pulls current capital across linked accounts, tracks the highest value seen (lastPeak), and computes drawdown from there. If drawdown crosses the threshold, it fires a Telegram alert. An alertTriggered flag prevents spamming, i.e. it only re-arms when the portfolio recovers back above the threshold. The first naive version was sending one alert per minute the whole time the portfolio was underwater, which is useless.

The math itself is trivial: adjust the peak by the flow amount. The annoying part is the detection layer. So what I'm going to work on next is distinguishing real drawdowns from cash flows. If I withdraw 15% of the account, that's not a 15% loss. Same in reverse: a fresh deposit pushes a new "peak" that isn't really a peak. A tricky case is when a transfer between two linked brokers looks like a withdrawal on one and a deposit on the other: net zero, but each leg looks like a flow if you only see one account.

Curious if anyone's been down this road and hit something that broke that approach.

u/Money_Horror_2899 — 1 day ago
▲ 12 r/ai_trading+9 crossposts

1% Weekly Returns From Options Week 12

https://preview.redd.it/nqx838t8ta2h1.png?width=1095&format=png&auto=webp&s=64cfa7af71599be0ed9e9e549ca3e81f21254639

I have to move things to next week early because I'm not around the next couple of days. Also this isn't a great week to do that as a lot of things are down significantly. But I'm going to try and maintain the 1%

Week 7: $573 on $53,800 invested
Week 8: $811 on $70,400 invested.
Week 9: $1093 on $103,450 invested
Week 10: $1040 on $97,400 invested
Week 11: $1077 on $102,800 invested.

I'll post this week's in the comments

last week's post:

https://www.reddit.com/r/TheRaceTo10Million/comments/1td415o/1_weekly_returns_from_options_week_11/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=mweb3x&utm_name=mweb3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button

reddit.com
▲ 6 r/ai_trading+4 crossposts

🟦 Symmetrical Triangle forming on BARD/USDT (15m)

ChartScout picked up a clean Symmetrical Triangle chart pattern on the 15-minute timeframe. This consolidation structure shows price tightening between converging trendlines, with 87.5% maturity.

A solid technical analysis setup with clear market structure and support/resistance levels worth watching for confirmation. DYOR.

u/ChartSage — 1 day ago

A Simple, Effective Strategy Turning 3K into 64K YTD

I would also like to thank those who helped me, enabling me to achieve a return of 281.07% over three months.

but to be honest, this turnaround didn't happen overnight it certainly didn't just begin today.

not long ago, I was doing exactly what most people do: blindly following trading signals, acting on impulse, and chasing after quick money.sometimes, that approach actually worked.

but in the vast majority of cases, it was nothing more than a futile exercise in futility.

for me, the true turning point came after I connected with a group of people who could articulate with genuine clarity why a specific trade was worth entering.they didn't just simply shout, buy here!

Instead, they provided a concrete analysis:what is the current trade setup? where are the key risk points located? and under what conditions would the underlying trading logic no longer hold true?

these concepts are actually quite simple, yet in the past, I had never truly put them into practice.

nowadays, I spend far more time waiting than I do actually executing trades.

the noise and distractions have faded away, replaced by a more rigorous methodology and structure.

although I continue to learn and refine my skills day by day, my trading process now gives me a sense of control I’ve never experienced before.

If you are active in various stock trading signal communities but yearn for a deeper, more thorough understanding of the logic behind the trades, then joining a truly high quality community can make a world of difference.

I wanted to share this experience in the hope that it might offer some inspiration to those friends who currently feel lost or helpless stuck in the chaotic quagmire of frequent, impulsive trading.

u/Independent_Gur8648 — 1 day ago

Built an automated futures trading system over the last ~15 months — curious what experienced traders think

Hey everyone,

Over the last ~15 months we’ve been building and refining an automated futures trading system for NinjaTrader based on our own manual trading experience.

The system combines fixed-rule execution with concepts related to market structure, liquidity behavior and SMC-style logic.

The main objective from the beginning was not to create a “holy grail”, but rather something capable of surviving different market conditions while removing the emotional side of execution entirely.

Instead of discretionary trading, the focus was placed on:

• predefined execution rules
• controlled risk parameters
• session-based filtering
• automated management
• consistency over long periods

The system currently runs multiple models across futures markets including indices, forex, crypto, metals and bonds.

We’ve mainly been testing robustness, behavior during drawdowns and long-term stability rather than trying to aggressively optimize for unrealistic returns.

Internal hypothetical/backtested data currently covers:

01 Jan 2025 → 22 Apr 2026

Some examples from different models:

• NQ models reaching around ~$40K simulated net profit with high win-rate behavior
• ES models showing lower volatility and more controlled equity curves
• Treasury/Bond models performing surprisingly stable during slower market conditions
• Separate crypto and forex models behaving very differently depending on volatility regimes

Obviously these are hypothetical/backtested results, not audited live returns, and we fully understand the limitations that come with backtesting.

One thing we noticed during development is that systems with lower excitement but stronger consistency tend to survive much longer than highly optimized systems that look amazing for short periods.

Curious what more experienced traders here think about:

• balancing robustness vs optimization
• acceptable drawdown levels for futures automation
• differences between prop-firm behavior vs live-account behavior
• whether simpler fixed-rule systems tend to outperform more “intelligent” adaptive systems long-term

Happy to discuss the development process and hear different opinions from people running futures automation themselves.

▲ 2 r/ai_trading+1 crossposts

I built an AI-based signal scoring system to filter low-quality trades — feedback needed

Most traders don’t lose only because their analysis is bad.

They lose because they enter too many low-quality setups.

I’ve been working on a simple AI-based market signal system where every trade setup gets ranked before considering an entry.

The goal is not to blindly follow signals.

The goal is to answer 3 simple questions before entering:

  1. Is this setup actually strong?
  2. How confident is the signal?
  3. Is the risk worth taking?

Right now, the system gives every setup:

Signal Score out of 100
Trade Quality Grade
Confidence Level
Market Direction Bias

Example format:

Market: BTC/USDT

Signal Score: 84/100

Trade Grade: A

Confidence: High

Bias: Bullish

Risk Level: Medium

The idea is simple:

A setup with a score of 40–50 should probably be ignored.

A setup with 70+ may be worth watching.

A setup with 80+ may be a high-quality setup, but still needs proper risk management.

I’m not trying to build a “magic prediction bot.” I’m trying to build a filter that helps avoid emotional entries and low-quality trades.

Because in my experience, avoiding bad trades is just as important as finding good ones.

Would you personally use a scoring system like this before entering a trade?

Also, what factors would you include in the score?

For example:

Trend strength

Volume confirmation

Support/resistance zone

Volatility

Risk-reward ratio

News impact

Market sentiment

I’d appreciate honest feedback from traders, especially people who have tried signal bots or automated trading tools before.

reddit.com
u/Old-Quiet4857 — 1 day ago
▲ 11 r/ai_trading+3 crossposts

Get Access to TrenVantage RETAIL Indicator Today!

Most traders overcomplicate support & resistance.

TrenVantage automatically:
✔ Detects the trend
✔ Plots key support/resistance levels
✔ Filters market noise
✔ Alerts you before reactions happen

Built directly for TradingView traders who want clean charts and real context.

Would you actually use something like this?

Comment RETAIL if you want access.

u/TrenVantage — 2 days ago
▲ 1 r/ai_trading+1 crossposts

"Building a fully automated MT5 scalper for Gold — what hard rules would YOU feed it?"

"I'm building a 100% automated scalper bot on MetaTrader 5 for Gold (XAUUSD)" The system runs Python, executes through MT5 API, no manual touch.

I've spent weeks on the core architecture — entry detection, exits, risk management, multi-agent voting, macro filters, news lockdown, regime detection, broker-side fail-safes.

But before I lock my final rule set, I want to hear from real scalpers — what fixed, non-negotiable rules SHOULD a scalper bot follow?

Specifically asking about:

  1. Time filters — Which hours/sessions do you avoid no matter what? Any specific windows you only trade?
  2. News rules — How long before/after news do you stay out? Any news you trade through?
  3. Day-of-week filters — Mondays? Fridays? Any day you never scalp?
  4. Spread rules — Max spread you accept? Mid-trade emergency exits on spread spikes?
  5. Volatility filters — ATR-based skip rules? Skip when ATR too low or too high?
  6. Loss limits — Daily loss cap? Consecutive loss limit? Drawdown brakes?
  7. Re-entry rules — Cooldown after a loss? After SL hit on same setup?
  8. Entry confluence — Minimum confluence factors required? Block on conflicting signals?
  9. Exit logic — Fixed TP or trailing? Move SL to breakeven when? Partial closes?
  10. Position sizing — Fixed lot or risk-based? Scale with confidence?
  11. Anti-revenge logic — Any rules to prevent the bot from chasing after losses?
  12. Hard stops — What triggers you to KILL the bot for the day?

What's worked for you? What rules saved your account? What rules made it worse?

Open to any insight — even brutal "don't even bother automating this" reality checks.

Thanks in advance 🙏

reddit.com
u/Ok_Airline9211 — 3 days ago

Are most AI trading models underperforming simply because the inputs are too slow?

Been digging into this after noticing a pattern across a few systems.

A lot of models still rely heavily on:

OHLCV data, Derived indicators, Lagging volatility measures

Which worked fine when markets moved slower.

But right now, a lot of moves seem to be triggered by:

Sudden liquidity shifts, Positioning imbalances, Short term order flow changes

None of which are fully captured in standard datasets.

Started experimenting with:

Higher frequency data (where available)

Proxy signals for liquidity (wicks, failed breaks, rapid reversals)

Event driven filters instead of continuous signals

What’s interesting is:

Signal accuracy didn’t improve massively, but drawdowns became more controlled.

Feels like the edge isn’t better prediction, it’s avoiding bad conditions faster.

So now I’m questioning whether most “AI trading” underperformance is actually:

a modeling problem or just a data problem.

reddit.com
u/Training-Extent9606 — 2 days ago

The same bug shows up in almost every LLM-written backtest we've looked at

We've spent the last few months looking at trading code people generated with ChatGPT, Claude, and Cursor. Strategies in Pine Script, Python, MQL5, you name it. There's one bug that shows up over and over, and the equity curves never look broken because of it.

The model writes signal logic that references the current bar's close to decide whether to enter on that same bar. In live trading, you can't act on a close before it's happened. In a backtest with sloppy indexing, you can, and the strategy looks brilliant. Look-ahead bias, baked in.

LLMs do this constantly because the training data is full of educational code where indicator-on-close gets computed across the full series without thinking about real-time causality. The model isn't reasoning about when information becomes available; it's pattern-matching to "compute SMA, compare to close, generate signal."

You can't really catch it by reading the output either. The Python looks clean. The Pine Script compiles. The Sharpe is 2.4 and the curve goes up and to the right. The first time you find it is usually when live PnL doesn't match week one.

Full disclosure, we work on backtesting infrastructure, so this is the problem I think about constantly. We're interested in what others have found when you've used an LLM to write strategy code. Has lookahead been the bug that bit you, or have you seen worse?

reddit.com
u/Nvestiq — 3 days ago

Any tips?

Hi guys, I'm just getting into AI trading and how I can apply AI to my research and possibly executing as well. Any tips on how I can start?

reddit.com
u/Sbh156 — 2 days ago
▲ 5 r/ai_trading+2 crossposts

Paper vs Real trades Imali wins

Been testing my AI trading platform with paper trading before letting users risk real money and the results surprised me.
Current test stats:
• +$7,048 paper profit
• 62.6% win rate
• 1,100 trades executed
• Multiple strategies (Conservative, Balanced, Momentum, Arbitrage)
But here’s the important part: I’m not pretending paper trading = guaranteed live profits.
After modeling slippage, fees, spread, and real execution conditions, I think the realistic live equivalent is probably closer to around $3K–$5K during the same period depending on market conditions and strategy settings.
That honesty is actually why I built the platform this way:
beginners can start with paper trading first
users can test strategies before risking money
different risk modes for different experience levels
shows readiness scoring instead of “get rich quick” nonsense
Most trading apps push hype. I’m trying to build something that helps people learn first before going live.
Would you trust a platform more if it showed realistic expectations instead of fake “1000% gains” screenshots?
DM me if you want early access to test IMALI.

reddit.com
u/Agile_Strategy_223 — 2 days ago
▲ 1 r/ai_trading+1 crossposts

i backtest, optimise and automate your trading strategy

Hi, I'm a trader/programmer and I'd like to expand my trading bot roster to diversify better and have more sources of income. If you provide me with all the details of your trading strategy, I will automate it, run the backtest with the code, optimize it and, if it turns out to be profitable, I will give you the code. My only request is to provide me with a strategy with a minimum of objectivity (because obviously I have to plan it).

reddit.com
u/Facche_ — 2 days ago
▲ 1 r/ai_trading+1 crossposts

INM EXPECTED respectively INM Nasdaq 2.5-4-5$

The transaction, approved by both boards, is expected to close in H2 2026, subject to shareholder approvals and SEC registration statement effectiveness. Mentari's existing board, chaired by Julie Bruno of Fairmount, will govern the combined company. First-in-human regulatory filings for MT-001 and MT-002 are expected mid-2026 and Q1 2027, respectively INM Nasdaq 2.5-4-5$

reddit.com
u/Jareo_San — 2 days ago