Worth it if you aren't religious or spiritual?
I know this question has been asked in some form on a few occasions, but I'm considering getting this book and one of my main concerns is that I know the book is heavy on the idea of a god existing and being an intrinsic part of creativity.
I have read the disclaimer the book provides from a chapter sample and it's... not ideal. It's a bit patronising, to say the least. I'm also not keen on having to interrupt my own reading repeatedly to mentally correct the text of the book.
The book seems to, on the whole, be very heavy on the idea of an external force acting on human creativity, and in there being something fundamentally "spiritual" (a meaningless term outside of a religious context, to me) about creativity. I disagree philosophically in many ways with what I've read so far, but the exercises genuinely seem to help people.
Overwhelmingly, the advice people have been giving is to simply interrupt yourself every time the word "god" comes up and alter it for yourself somehow. That seems like a bad way of reading anything. I've also seen the advice of "take what you want and leave the rest", but realistically how much am I likely to get out of this if I'm having to throw out a major aspect of the book's thesis?
I guess my question is, is the whole thing unreadable to me? Am I likely going to be too frustrated with the framing to get use out of it?