After selling both my extensions for a humble amount of money, I thought i would relax because it was my first time making money but i was still hungry to build. So now, I'm building an extension that hides your geolocation from websites. I just want to say to those who are working, don't stop. Keep it up

Edit: I have to say, I did take motivation from GeoSpoof so props to the builder

I built and launched a small Manifest V3 Chrome extension called Quib.

The problem was very plain: I had around 40 AI prompts sitting in a Notion doc, and I was copy-pasting them into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Gmail, GitHub, Linear, and other tools all day.
Quib adds a prompt picker directly inside textboxes.

You type /, fuzzy-search a saved prompt, hit enter, and it inserts where you are already typing.

It supports normal inputs, textareas, and contenteditable editors. It also resolves variables at insert time, like:
{{selection}}
{{url}}
{{title}}
{{clipboard}}
{{date}}
{{time}}
custom placeholders like {{name}}

The free plan has 25 prompts, local storage, all editors, and all variables. Pro adds unlimited prompts and cross-device sync.

The Chrome Web Store version is live now.

I would especially like feedback from people who build or heavily use Chrome extensions:

Does the / trigger feel natural, or would you prefer another default?
Which editor/site would you expect this to fail on?
Is prompt management a real enough problem for you, or too niche?

Link: arkisoul.in/quib

After a first lunch I made a new redesign after some feedback and make a rather big update to the whole thing. It's about a new starter tab, but that also can lauche files, scripts etc.. and just serves as a starter dashboard. Give it a look if you like it. https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/readytab/ccakmoofmcbcplfaloecafdmpaihlenm?authuser=0&hl=de

https://readytab.cloud/

I made a meta-search engine that sends one query to multiple AI services in parallel and synthesizes their answers so you can see where they agree and where they diverge. No login required and no data collected. Looking for your honest feedback.

Problem I solved

I’ve been doing the same dumb workflow for months: same prompt, three tabs, then I sit there comparing answers like I’m fact-checking three opinion columns.

Each AI is good at different things. Perplexity cites well. Gemini is fresh. ChatGPT reasons through messy questions. Grok catches stuff on X before it hits the news. But they also fail in different ways. If you only use one, you’re basically betting on a single columnist who might be brilliant, biased, or confidently wrong.

Perplexity’s Model Council is a step in the right direction, but it’s still one product. What I wanted was cross-vendor: one query, multiple services, see where they agree and where they don’t.

My solution

Still early, but the idea is simple: for anything that actually matters. For research, purchases, health questions, one model isn’t enough. You want consensus and conflict visible, not smoothed into one confident paragraph.

I made a search layer above the chatbots. You ask once; it hits ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Grok, and others in parallel, then synthesizes the results instead of hiding disagreements.

The hard part isn’t “another chatbot.” It’s that these aren’t static web pages you can crawl. So the backend uses browser agents to interact with them in real time. More orchestration than classic search indexing.

Curious if anyone else is doing this multi-tab reconciliation manually, or if you’ve found something that already solves it.

Here is my extension: Qorpus
Visit the homepage: qorpus.ai