A major 2025 adversarial test of GNWT and IIT found results that challenged predictions from both theories rather than cleanly vindicating either.
So we need a better theory folks. What’s it gonna be?
Hi everyone — I put together this free interactive resource for exploring cognitive biases and related effects. I thought it might be relevant and helpful here.
It’s adapted from the Cognitive Bias Codex, with 188 entries, plain-English explanations, everyday examples, sources, and short animated videos. Credit for the original Codex is on the site.
I’d appreciate any feedback or corrections.
I have compiled a large list of books: fiction and non-fiction
Greetings to all. One day, I started analyzing the popularity of the topic of consciousness, and as a result, I compiled a fairly large list of books on the topic of consciousness. I obviously did it with the help of AI, or rather with the help of an AI council, because I personally would not have been able to view and read everything in a short time (at first glance, it would seem that this could be done in half an hour, but it took me quite a lot of time to complete this list, not counting the design and the "war" with word). It follows from this that the accuracy (relevance) of all positions in it is about 80% according to a personal feeling - that is, there may be positions that at least may poorly enter into the topic of consciousness (especially in fiction due to the author's vision or techniques). With this post, I want not only to share the list, but also hope for your feedback on their accuracy, so that we can work together to finish its "crystallization". Link to the FULL list below:
I also attach a list of hits from the full list.
Fiction:
Non fiction:
This is not a complete list. See the full list at the link above!
Have fun reading)
Hey everyone,
I recently started a small YouTube channel called Mind Margins where I want to make videos about psychology, perception, attention, memory, storytelling, and cognitive science.
I have a Bachelor of Science in Psychology, and my goal is to make videos that are scientifically grounded, but still visually interesting and easy to watch.
The first video is about inattentional blindness: why we can look directly at something and still fail to notice it. It covers the classic invisible gorilla experiment, the radiologist CT study, perceptual load, expertise, and the question of whether “not reported” necessarily means “not processed.”
For the visuals I use AI-assisted animations, but I do the research, editing, pacing, sound design, and final creative decisions myself.
I’d like to keep producing this kind of content in the future, so if that sounds interesting, feel free to check it out or follow the channel.
And if anyone here has feedback on the science, presentation, pacing, or what topics would be interesting next, I’d genuinely appreciate it.
Video: https://youtu.be/Virer2zhG4U
Channel: Mind Margins