Atom Maxi Sanctum! We are a group of very bullish and very atom/cosmos ecosystem positive supporters! Giveaways done everyday, 1k+ atom given away, access to new and growing projects in the ecosystem and it’s really just a good time chatting about atom and everyday things! Lots of great friendships to be made! If you’re interested in joining Maxis. TG below!
Cosmostation Wallet Is Shutting Down — Yet Its AtomOne Validator Still Holds ~2.2M $ATONE
Cosmostation, long one of the leading non-custodial wallets in the Cosmos ecosystem (often ranked second by usage), announced on August 14, 2026 that it is discontinuing its wallet services.
Starting September 1, 2026, the iOS app, Android app, and Chrome extension will retain only two functions: exporting recovery phrases and exporting private keys. All other features — staking, governance, asset management, and more — will be phased out. Because Cosmostation is non-custodial, user funds remain on-chain and safe as long as seed phrases or private keys are backed up and imported into another wallet (such as Keplr).
The company thanked users for years of support since its 2018 launch and said it still believes in the long-term future of blockchain and the interchain, though it did not publicly detail the reasons for the full wallet shutdown.
##The lingering AtomOne stake
Separately, Cosmostation had already announced it would stop operating its validator on several networks, including AtomOne ($ATONE), effective July 20, 2026. Despite that, roughly a month later a significant amount of stake remains.
As of mid-August 2026, the Cosmostation validator on AtomOne still has approximately 2.2 million $ATONE delegated to it, involving nearly 3,800 delegators. Those tokens are no longer earning rewards while the validator is offline/jailed.
Delegators who have not yet moved their stake are effectively forgoing yield. Redelegation to an active validator is straightforward on most Cosmos-compatible wallets and does not require unbonding in many cases.
##Bottom line
Cosmostation’s wallet exit removes a major user-facing product from the interchain, following earlier exits such as Leap. Meanwhile, the incomplete migration of its AtomOne stake highlights a common pain point when validators wind down: many users never update their delegations. Anyone still staked with the Cosmostation AtomOne validator should redelegate promptly to resume earning rewards.
I’m AC I’m apart of a ATOM telegram group for ATOM positive vibes, sometimes it gets hard seeing a lot of FUD and not much positive Atom vibes, and positive Atom news, Atom Maxi Sanctum we are 200+ strong and have active giveaways daily, over 1000 atom given away! We share ideas, have debates, joke and chat around and have direct link to the ceos/developers of Cosmos Labs. If you’re interested in joining let me know and I can give you an invite! Can’t wait to see all the future maxis there!
I think you all might have heard but Solana almost came to a halt yesterday.
And I know nothing bad has happend yet but it does show that there is a fundamental problem in the blockchain space. Which is relying on a single chain for all infrastructure. Imagine you are a big bank and you rely on your blockchain infrastructure for payments. Just like that your company is shutdown and there is nothing you can do. And this is what should replace the banking systems.
This is the reason I believe we don't need a better Ethereum we need a different approach. And that is the reason I believe in Cosmos. I think App chains are the only logical solution. If it's not some kind of IBC or something similar "Blockchain" as a whole has no merit to exist apart from Bitcoin.
It baffles me why there are so many projects moving to other chains. But as long as they can, they will. Big projects came an went on Cosmos and it didn't affect (apart from the price maybe) the other Cosmos chains. I think in the bigger picture this is the only way forward. Atom itself could go to 0 or come to halt, yet a blockchain build on the Cosmos SDK is most likely unaffected.
I know I'm mostly ranting against myself here but it's as clear as day for me. It's either Cosmos or Nothing. With the price of ATOM being irrelevant.
Thank you in advance.
Hello. I had ATOM staked with a validator, then I wanted to stake them on Stride. I confirmed everything, and my ATOM went through all the steps except the last one: "Stake ATOM, get stATOM." I’m getting this error message: "Transaction error. This transfer could not be completed. Your tokens are on Stride, but have not been staked. Please try again." For context, I’m using Keplr and have small amounts of ATOM and STRD on both blockchains. If you could help me, I would be very grateful.
Together, we're making it easier for banks, financial institutions, and enterprises to move from blockchain pilots to production.
By combining Cosmos proven digital ledger technology with Zeeve's production-grade blockchain infrastructure, organizations can deploy tokenized deposits and digital asset solutions with greater confidence.
What this partnership brings:
▴ Cosmos stack powering 150+ blockchains since 2019
▴ 10,000+ TPS with sub-second transaction finality
▴ Native interoperability for enterprise ecosystems
▴ Zeeve's managed deployment, migration, node & validator operations
▴ Enterprise-grade privacy through the Zeeve Privacy Layer
▴ SOC 2 Type II & ISO 27001 compliant infrastructure
▴ 99.99% uptime SLA with 24×7 monitoring
At Zeeve, we believe blockchain adoption shouldn't stop at proof of concept. It should reach production, securely, reliably, and at scale.
We're pleased to announce that Sapphire, the latest test network for Gno.land, is live. Sapphire is the next iteration after Topaz, and it is a new chain, not a hardfork. Notice: Sapphire is an experimental test network.
As it was with Topaz, no state carries over from the previous testnet, so balances, realms, and registered names all start at zero. To participate, you’ll have to receive GNOT from the faucet and re-register your names. https://faucet.gno.land/
Topaz will sunset within the next 24 hours.
GnoSwap Beta is live on Gno.land Sapphire, the final testnet ahead of mainnet.
To celebrate, we're launching GnoSwap Sapphire Rush, a $3,000 Community Challenge. We're inviting all community members with various skill sets, by offering 6 different ways to win.
DeFi Power users, high-frequency traders, daily users, and even content creators - everyone has a chance to grab a share of the prize pool.
Full Details: https://x.com/i/status/2087193680583225428
Hey all,
So I believe I have made a bad mistake by forgetting what I had on Osmosis and now I'm stuck trying to figure out how to move my WBTC.eth.axl to a the native network on a new Coldwallet. Don't suppose anyone here or a mod can push me into the right direction please.
PS I will not be responding to any DMs
Weekly Update - August 7
Core Development Updates
• Introducing Dora, an agentic security harness that audits Gno.land: https://x.com/\_gnoland/status/2084595722985652501
• Aligned p/nt/commondao/v0 with the Common DAO Spec, adding per-DAO treasuries and a governable proposal-kind registry: https://github.com/gnolang/gno/pull/6012
• Moved non-gas balances into their own storage keys, to close a griefing attack where junk denoms could permanently inflate a victim's per-transaction gas cost: https://github.com/gnolang/gno/pull/6034
• Fixed the topaz-1 AppHash mismatch by isolating read-only queries from live chain state: https://github.com/gnolang/gno/pull/6018
Community News
• $GNOT’s preview page is live on CoinMarketCap and CoinGecko: https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/gno-land/
https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/gno-land
Ecosystem Highlights
• Adena releases v1.20.2 to support in-app IBC-token display: https://github.com/onbloc/adena-wallet/pull/878
• Akkadia’s ABP review: https://x.com/_akkadia/status/2085295415579312339
• Cumulo shares articles on Gno.land in English and Spanish: https://x.com/Cumulo\_pro/status/2083432541315317864
I’m building AgentNOMOS, and I would like feedback from people working on
AI agents, wallets, x402 or XRPL infrastructure.
The problem we are trying to solve:
An autonomous agent prepares a payment, but before it signs the transaction,
someone should verify:
- Is the agent authorized to make this payment?
- Is the destination allowed?
- Does the amount match the original intent?
- Does the action require human review?
- Can the decision later be proven?
Our current flow is:
The agent prepares a payment intent.
It calls AgentNOMOS before signing.
It pays 0.001 XRP through x402 for the preflight.
AgentNOMOS returns a governed decision and transaction-bound evidence.
The agent signs only if the result allows it.
The transaction being evaluated does not need to exist on-chain yet.
The 0.001 XRP transaction pays for the preflight itself.
We now have two live XRPL Mainnet services:
- Governed XRPL Payment Preflight
- Cross-Border Compliance Preflight
Both are listed in the XRPL x402 marketplace and have completed real
Mainnet canaries.
But we are at the stage where external usage matters more than adding more
endpoints. Our current external-user baseline for these two services is
honestly zero.
So I have three questions for builders:
Would a separate 0.001 XRP payment for every preflight be acceptable?
Would payment channels, prepaid credits or batched settlement make more sense?
What would AgentNOMOS need to return before you would place it in front of
a real wallet, treasury or trading agent?
The live integration examples and Mainnet proofs are here:
I’m looking for criticism and one or two real integrations, not artificial
transaction volume.