





Turner & Harrison No. 506 Bowl Point pen box, circa 1950. Opened and tested the nib against the likes of Esterbrook 788 and Hunt 513. Pictures and thoughts included
I have made the statement in the past that if one could not find vintage Estebrook 788 Oval Point, that the vintage Hunt 513 EF Globe or the Turner & Harrison No. 506 Bowl Point were comparable substitutes with the same performance. The problem is that until now I have only tested that with the Hunt 513, and never really got my hands on the Turner & Harrison No. 506. My assertions about this nib was based on the way they looked almost identical to the other two.
Well, that finally changed. I acquired a gross box of Turner & Harrison No. 506 Bowl Point pens. Immediately I could see that despite the similarities, the vent hole on them is smaller than the Esterbrook 788 and Hunt 513. It made me worried that perhaps I have been too hasty in my assumption, so I had to test all three side by side to see if I could tell the difference.
After writing a full page with each I have come to the conclusion that my original assertion is 100% spot on. By smoothness on paper, ink flow, and feel, they are so near identical to each other. If I was doing a blind writing test I don't think I'd be able to accurately tell which one I was using. Even on paper the lines are very similar.
I included here a writing sample with all 3 nibs writing their own names with the same type of ink, plus a separate photo of all three nibs side by side, and just the T&H 506.
So after all of that I stand by what I said, they are practically interchangeable. If for whatever reason you can't find find the Esterbrook 788, you can just get some vintage Hunt's 513 or Turner & Harrison 506 and get pretty much the same experience and feel you were looking for with the Esterbrook 788.