



This is happening right across the bridge from NYC in our backyard. Martin Soto has been held by ICE for months and was thrown in solitary after taking part in a hunger and labor strike inside the facility. His wife Gabriela is 6 months pregnant with two young kids, all U.S. citizens.
I sat down with Gabriela and spoke with Martin from inside detention about the conditions and why he still refuses to sign a voluntary departure. They're about 2,500 signatures from their goal.
Sign here: https://actionnetwork.org/petitions/free-martin-soto
Full interview for the context: https://youtu.be/6AbjRWD6dZY
Donald Trump stole three-hundred boxes of top-secret documents and only the efforts of a corrupt judge kept him out of prison.
These plans outlined our deepest secrets about our national security as well as our allies’ strategies should war break out with Russia.
The question as to why he stole those documents has never been addressed by the administration. The question about him transferring, or selling, the information has never been asked or explained.
The documents themselves were found scattered about Mar A Lago where any pool boy, maid, maintenance worker or spy could trip over them with no one being the wiser.
Were there cell phone images transmitted to foreign agencies? We’ll probably never know.
Now Trump (under Putin’s orders?) wants a complete list of all government spies – names, addresses, their operational status including areas of operation, every detail that could expose them and possibly lead to their arrest or assassination.
Why? How could we possibly trust a convicted felon – a cheat, a grifter with a lust for money that constantly engages in corruption at an unpresented scale, and still sleep at night? Aside from not protecting the evidence, he is more apt to sell it to the highest bidder.
Would anyone be surprised if we found out he has done it more than once?
See this:
Spy chiefs in revolt over Trump demand for master list of every secret agent - fearing a catastrophic risk
By PHILLIP NIETO, US POLITICAL REPORTER
CIA and FBI leaders are resisting Donald Trump's mandate that intelligence agencies compile a master list of every US spy and potential recruit, amid fears it could endanger their own agents. The Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), first under Tulsi Gabbard and now under new director Bill Pulte, has in recent months spearheaded the grand spy list effort. ODNI was created in the aftermath of 9/11 to foster better communication among intel agencies.
Trump wants the master list because officials claim it could used to better track foreign intelligence threats and avoid inadvertent conflicts when different agencies are working the same targets, according to the New York Times. The effort has been largely unsuccessful, as senior counterintelligence officials have refused to hand over their master lists amid disagreements over how such a database would be secured and maintained.
For the FBI, such a master list of espionage targets would include those the bureau wants to investigate and potentially arrest down the line. For the CIA, it would include a significant number of potential individuals the agency hopes to recruit as assets. Some current and former intelligence officials fear that putting identifying details on the most sensitive cases could fatally compromise long-running investigations and operations via a single leak.
The identities of these targets are closely guarded national security secrets, insulated from most personnel within their own agencies.
Trump is demanding leaders at the FBI and CIA give him a list of every secret agent and asset
Trump is demanding leaders at the FBI and CIA give him a list of every secret agent and asset The effort has been largely unsuccessful, as senior counterintelligence officials have refused to hand over their master lists amid disagreements over how such a database would be secured and maintained
The effort has been largely unsuccessful, as senior counterintelligence officials have refused to hand over their master lists amid disagreements over how such a database would be secured and maintained
Bill Pulte, Trump's new National Intelligence director, has no prior experience dealing with national security
The fight over the master list highlights the strained relationship between ODNI and the FBI and CIA following the departure of former ODNI director Tulsi Gabbard.
Pulte, a political appointee with no prior experience in national security, has continued pursuing the President's agenda by slashing the office's workforce and investigating allegations of election fraud during 2020. Outrage over Pulte's appointment as acting director despite his lack of experience has also fueled fears among agency officials about how ODNI would handle their most closely guarded secrets.
Trump appointed Pulte as acting director rather than formally nominating him, sidestepping a Senate confirmation process where lawmakers had openly opposed him.
The disagreement over the master list continues to play out behind closed doors as officials spar over how much, if anything, to hand over to ODNI.
Under Gabbard, the master list effort was part of her broader push for greater oversight across the intelligence community, according to former officials who spoke with the Times.
Officials had hoped that Pulte would abandon the directive but it does not appear to be going away anytime soon despite internal disagreement.
Supporters of the master list see it functioning like a terrorist watch list that enables the US to monitor targets across the globe in real time through constant information-sharing between agencies.
But seasoned counterintelligence officials warn the program risks alerting the very people under investigation, especially trained foreign operatives skilled at spotting surveillance, according to current and former officials.
Everyone talks about calling offices, emails, petitions, and social media pressure, but I barely ever see people mention old-school physical letters anymore. I'm envisioning the harry potter gif (if you know you know).
Since congressional offices still receive and process mail, I’m wondering if activists (we) should be using physical letters more often, especially for issues where a short personal message matters.
Has anyone here actually organized letter-writing campaigns recently? Do they still get taken seriously by offices, or is calling still the better use of time?
Talk about a bunch of stick-up-the-asshole, losers; say hello to the Christian Nationalist Right.
These quaking, quivering Bozos are so afraid of their natural homosexual tendencies they will gleefully condemn anyone, gay, straight, trans, or gerbil fetish, if it might make them look straight.
It’s a sickness to hate anyone you don’t know simply because you have proclivities to hide, desires you can’t control, and magazines hidden from your spouse.
No matter how they couch it (apologies to JD Vance and his predilections), these hypocrites seethe with hatred because of emotions they can barely suppress, and like most cowards blame others for their own self-imagined shortcomings.
Could be worse, though. You could be related to one of these sanctimonious bastards.
See this – Boldface mine:
Novel MAGA celebration reflects Christian fundamentalists’ never-ending paranoia
Story by Alex Henderson • 2h • 2 min read
© provided by AlterNet
This Tuesday, June 30 marks the conclusion of "Nuclear Family Month," which many MAGA Republicans have been promoting as a Christian fundamentalist alternative to Pride Month. Defenders of "Nuclear Family Month" often argue that they are merely defending religious values, not attacking LGBTQ Americans. But Salon's Amanda Marcotte argues that "Nuclear Family Month" is not only anti-gay — it also underscores the Religious Right's contempt for heterosexuals who don't embrace their severe version of Christianity.
"In recent years," Marcotte observes in Salon, "Republican propaganda has quietly moved away from loud condemnation of the gay community to focusing the most overt hate on trans people. Donald Trump even has a few token gay men in his closest circles, such as Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who has two children with his husband…. But while it hasn't attracted widespread media coverage, Republicans have not given up arguing that LGBTQ+ equality is a threat. This year, a slew of red state governors signed proclamations intended as blatant attacks on Pride Month."
Marcotte continues, "Some states are even calling June 'Nuclear Family Month.' Others have dubbed it 'Strong Families Month' or 'Fidelity Month.' Whatever euphemism is used, they are all poking a thumb in the eye of LGBTQ+ people during Pride, as Arkansas' Republican governor, Sarah Huckabee Sanders, made clear when she tweeted a Daily Wire article headlined, 'Another Red State Is Counter-Programming Pride Month, Focusing On Family Instead' — as if queer people don't have families."
Gay pride events have grown by leaps and bounds in the United States, where Pride Month is now a month-long celebration held in June. On Sunday, June 7, for example, Philadelphia's 2026 Philly Pride festival reported attracted around 147,000-150,000 attendees.
Marcotte, in Salon, emphasizes that heterosexual Americans should also be worried about the motivations behind "Nuclear Family Month."
"Straight people should definitely not feel safe with these Republicans in charge," Marcotte warns. "These documents don't only demonize LGBTQ+ people; they condemn the vast majority of straight people who don't adhere to the exceedingly narrow proscriptions of the Christian right. Divorced people, anyone who has ever needed government assistance, parents who put their kids in public school, non-Christians and women who don't see themselves as inferior to their husbands all get blasted as immoral — and queer people are implicitly blamed for what Republicans see as 'dysfunction' in the lives of everyday straight people…. 'Nuclear Family Month' and other such nonsense this year reflects a resurgence in the GOP of the view that most people, straight or not, are wicked, oversexed hooligans who need to be browbeaten into depressing marriages. Vice President JD Vance has been at the forefront of this pressure campaign that wants people to marry not out of love or joy, but out of grim duty to the patriarchy."