r/eulaw

▲ 2 r/eulaw

Can I ask for updates to OLAF about my report?

I read in EULAW RULES that no requests for legal advice are accepted. I submit this post believing that the nature of my post is of a more general nature regarding the basic rights of people submitting a report to OLAF.

----

I have recently (about 1 month ago) submitted to OLAF a report about what I consider a case of fraud, which is in this case the abuse of power of an executive agency within a public call for project proposals.

Notice that, in this case, the problem is a denial of funding. I still believe that this case meets OLAF's mandate, and specifically their definition of fraud: "An irregularity is an act which doesn’t comply with EU rules and which has a potentially negative impact on EU financial interests... If an irregularity is committed deliberately, however, it’s fraud(See more in Article 1 of Council Regulation 2988/95)"

However, they also report:

"Please note that OLAF cannot investigate allegations of: fraud with no financial impact on EU public funds."

The case of a "denial of funding" creates some potential friction, as "no financial impact" may be argued since no money was given, still a "financial impact" can be argued as the undue denial of one project proposal due to inadequate reasoning (as reported in the EU page Complaints about Rejections of Project Proposals) affects the EU budget against the EU financial interests.

The point is that I am bringing on this fight publicly, and I released the evidence in this Zenodo report: https://zenodo.org/records/17225804

I now submitted the information to OLAF, but the organization reports that I may not be informed in case of dismissal: "If it is determined that the matter you have raised does not satisfy the criteria for opening an investigation, it will be dismissed. If this occurs, OLAF may inform you about this, but this is not done systematically."

I would like to be informed whether this occurs, as this information is important to me to understand how to develop my advocacy action in favor of research, innovation, and the defense of democratic processes.

From a legal perspective, do submitted have a right to be request for information about the status of their submission? Who should be contacted in such a case?

reddit.com
u/lucedan — 1 day ago
▲ 64 r/eulaw

If Switzerland passes the “10 million citizen and permanent resident” cap are they essentially legally renouncing their freedom of trade and movement agreement with the EU?

reddit.com
u/YogurtclosetOpen3567 — 4 days ago
▲ 0 r/eulaw

Eu citizen with LLB from outside of europe?

Hi everyone,

I have a law degree from Argentina and hold Italian citizenship. I’m currently exploring opportunities in Europe, particularly in-house legal roles such as data privacy, maritime law, or similar fields that may not require admission to a local bar association.

From what I understand, some legal positions within companies do not necessarily require a law degree from a specific EU country or local bar qualification. Is this correct?

I’m planning to relocate to Europe and would like to know whether a non-EU law degree can still be useful for legal or quasi-legal roles. Is it possible to work as an attorney or legal professional in Europe with a foreign law degree?

Any insights or experiences would be greatly appreciated.

reddit.com
u/Competitive_Bend_930 — 7 days ago
▲ 17 r/eulaw

Why did Denmark bother getting a explicit reservation from adopting the Euro if Sweden has basically found a loophole from ever adopting it(convergence criteria)?

Endless loophole

reddit.com
u/YogurtclosetOpen3567 — 10 days ago
▲ 9 r/eulaw

Ziobro confirms he is in US, says he travelled there with document issued by Hungary

“What legal basis allowed Zbigniew Ziobro to leave Hungarian territory and enter the United States without valid documents?”

telex.hu
u/IntrepidWolverine517 — 11 days ago
▲ 8 r/eulaw+1 crossposts

CoE French language requirements

Hello! I intend to apply for college of Europe and I believe I have good chances. Yet I do not have a French Language Diploma. I am taking intensive courses and I believe I can get to a level of B2 by the time of application. Yet, I will not be able to take an exam. Can I still get shortlisted or it is considered as I do not fulfill the requirements?

reddit.com
u/Mother-Dot8484 — 11 days ago
▲ 18 r/eulaw+1 crossposts

[LV] Trading Pro “Technical Error” and attempt to settle with “Reward”

Sup folks, I want to start a personal thread about the issue I faced with Revolut Trading Pro.

TLDR; Revolut closed my position by mistake, admitted, but refund only the difference between settle price and market price as “Reward”

So I bought $CAPR stock recently (I’m trading with biotech companies mostly). On 29th April I set up stop order trigger with price $29.91. Purchase price was 33.72.

04th of May $CAPR was opened with gap up and continued to rapidly grow so I was happy until I got notification from Revolut that my stop order was executed with price $27.74 !!! Ok I understand these type of stocks are volatile for sure, and it could happen such sudden drop (after earnings etc). So I quickly open app and $CAPR was not even close. In fact it was far far away from my stop trigger.

I immediately contacted support, but I was gaslighted that it is risky asset bla-bla-bla.

So I said please share me details where I will see the instant drop of the price for more that 10% and having the lowest price possible of the execution… and silence for next few days.

Yesterday I finally got reply that Revolut admitted error with this order and ready to refund me!

You know having such stress I was expecting to get something in return upon my full differential amount. So I said to support that I will check and decide the refund option at first before to accept.

The supporter returned back and said we will refund you with $126 as the difference between $27.74 and market price at that moment $32.24.

I was shocked, in fact, so I reject such refund and demanded the following:

  1. fully difference between my entry price and sold price e.g. roughly $170
  2. compensation for the stress and loosing the trust for the service of Trading Pro (which cost 15€ per month)

Obviously the supporter said it is not up to them, so I have to write formal complaint to their legal.

I filled the form, and in parallel I saw that they still “refund” those $126 on trading account. And guess what guys? They marked it as “REWARD”. If you living in Europe you know that is taxable income, so instead of 1 headache they gave me another one.

Back to the story. I received today forma bla-bla response and their “goodwill” coverage for the stress with amount of 30€. So even with this amount I have loss around $10 of my initial investment.

The good part is that they confirmed of their error in the response, so I filled official complaint letter the authority (Bank of Lithuania).

As I’m not the best in legal terms so I asked ai help of the list of their violation:

REVOLUT VIOLATIONS SUMMARY:

  1. MiFID II Best Execution Breach: Revolut is legally required to obtain the best possible result for clients. Executing at $27.74 when the actual market price was $32.24 (a 14% difference) is a massive regulatory failure.

  2. Execution Outside Market Range: The daily low for CAPR was $31.06. Revolut executed my trade at $27.74—a price that literally did not exist on any exchange that day. This is "Gross Negligence," not market volatility.

  3. Trading Pro Service Failure: I paid €15/month for a "Pro" subscription. This is a "Failure of Paid Service" and "Product Mis-selling," as the premium tool failed to perform its core function.

  4. Tax Manipulation (The "Reward" Trick): Instead of a formal "Compensatory Settlement," Revolut labeled $126 of the refund as a "Reward." This is a dirty tactic to:
    - Hide operational errors from regulators by masking them as marketing expenses.
    - Shift the tax burden to the customer (Rewards are taxable income in many jurisdictions, whereas compensation is not).

  5. Operational Resilience Breach (DORA): Under the Digital Operational Resilience Act, this "technical error" proves their trading infrastructure lacks the necessary safeguards to prevent systemic execution bugs.

  6. Bad Faith Settlement: Attempting to "lowball" a customer with $124 when the math-verified loss was $170+ is a violation of basic consumer protection standards for financial institutions.

So I will continue to fight for my rights in parallel will update this post or create a chain.

By the way if you ever experienced of similar situation when REVOLUT executed with significant lower price let me know. I’m sure such errors is quite common and cannot be hidden under “market volatility”.

u/Brilliant_Slip_6260 — 13 days ago
▲ 2 r/eulaw+1 crossposts

Hi everyone,

I’m making this post because I’m tired of being gaslit by Revolut support regarding Instant SEPA transfers.

As a reminder, Regulation (EU) 2024/886 is now fully in effect. For banks within the Eurozone (including Revolut via its Lithuanian license), the deadline to fully implement the sending of Instant SEPA payments was October 2025. We are now well past that.

The Issue:
I’ve been trying to move funds to Trading 212. T212’s intermediary banks are part of the Instant SEPA scheme, yet Revolut consistently processes my deposits as "Standard SEPA," causing delays of hours or even days. It happens every time.

The Support Excuse (see screenshot):
Support (Subham) claims that the "beneficiary's bank might not be part of the scheme" or that there might be a "processing error."

Why this is total BS:

  1. The Law is Clear: Under the new mandate, if a bank offers standard SEPA, they MUST offer Instant SEPA. It is no longer an "optional" feature or a "premium" perk.
  2. The "Error" Loophole: Claiming a "processing error" that defaults to standard SEPA is a convenient way for Revolut to bypass the 10-second rule mandated by the EU. If it happens consistently, it's not an error—it’s a configuration choice.
  3. Price Parity: The law also mandates that Instant SEPA cannot cost more than standard SEPA. Since Revolut offers free standard transfers, they are legally obligated to provide Instant for free and by default whenever the receiving bank is capable.

It feels like Revolut is intentionally downgrading transfers to manage their own liquidity or save on infrastructure costs, hoping users won't cite the specific EU Regulation.

Has anyone else noticed Revolut "accidentally" failing to use Instant SEPA lately?

I am preparing a formal complaint to the Bank of Lithuania (Lietuvos bankas). If a transfer isn't completed within 10 seconds and both institutions are in the SEPA Instant network, Revolut is in direct breach of EU law.

https://preview.redd.it/dl6rb81rcxzg1.jpg?width=1206&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=56d5de4751080111ad201e65d7e3acf88d5dd586

Source: Regulation (EU) 2024/886 on Instant Credit Transfers

reddit.com
u/Icy_Afternoon_5774 — 13 days ago