r/exoplanets

▲ 159 r/exoplanets+2 crossposts

Kepler-442 b - Hypothetical Visualization

Kepler-442 b is a rocky exoplanet located approximately 1,200 light years from Earth in the constellation Lyra. Based on current NASA data, it is estimated to be slightly larger than earth, with a radius of about 1.3 Earth radii, and is thought to have a mass of roughly 2-3 earth masses, although it's exact composition remains uncertain.

The planet orbits a K-type main-sequence (orange dwarf) star with an effective temperature of approximately 4,400 K at a distance of roughly 0.41 AU, placing it within the star's habitable zone.

This is a hypothetical visualization created in Blender, loosely informed by the currently known properties of the Kepler-442 system, while the planet's appearance remains entirely unknown.

u/VireluneNova — 3 days ago
▲ 123 r/exoplanets+1 crossposts

Kepler-442 b- Speculative Artist's Impression

A speculative artist's impression of Kepler-442 b, a potentially habitable rocky exoplanet approximately 1,200 light years from earth.

u/VireluneNova — 3 days ago
▲ 52 r/exoplanets+1 crossposts

TOI 700 E - Artist's Impression (Speculative)

My interpretation of an earth sized rocky exoplanet orbiting a red dwarf star in the TOI 700 system located in the southern constellation of Dorado.

u/VireluneNova — 3 days ago
▲ 32 r/exoplanets+4 crossposts

The Hunt for Earth 2.0: How Lockheed Martin Plans to Spot Potentially Habitable Exoplanets

On its quest to find Earth’s twin, NASA is designing a next-generation space telescope that will focus on one specific, audacious goal: to directly image potentially habitable worlds and scan them for chemical signatures of life. Lockheed Martin was recently selected by the space agency to continue advancing next-gen technologies and architecture studies for this ambitious planet-hunting mission.

The Habitable Worlds Observatory (HWO) is planned to be a large aperture space telescope specifically engineered to identify Earth-like planets. NASA is working on the HWO concept using lessons learned from its predecessors like the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST). It will combine the large-stature segmented mirror philosophy of JWST with the optical wavelengths of the Hubble Space Telescope (HST), all while incorporating the coronagraph advancements being tested on the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope, slated for launch on August 30.

While a launch isn’t expected until the late 2030s or early 2040s, the rigorous groundwork being done today by NASA and industrial partners like Lockheed Martin represents the critical first steps. The North Bethesda-based aerospace giant is involved in the development of HWO under a study called Technology Maturation for Astrophysics Space Telescopes, or TechMAST.

“Lockheed Martin has steadily contributed to different phases of research and development for HWO, securing four different contracts for TechMAST maturation since 2018,” Tat’yana Berdan, Lockheed Martin spokesperson told Universelost.com.

Read more: https://universelost.com/2026/06/14/the-hunt-for-earth-2-0-how-lockheed-martin-plans-to-spot-potentially-habitable-exoplanets/

u/TomaszNowakowski — 4 days ago
▲ 28 r/exoplanets+6 crossposts

The Heat Is Out There: Tracking the Warmth of Alien Technology

The Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI) has largely operated on a single, fragile assumption: that if advanced aliens are out there, they want to talk to us. Traditional SETI programs spend millions of hours listening for deliberate radio broadcasts or scanning the skies for flashing laser beams. So maybe instead of waiting to catch a radio signal, we should look for the heat produced by advanced alien civilizations?

Jason T. Wright, a professor of astronomy and astrophysics at the Pennsylvania State University (PSU) started over a decade ago the G-HAT (Glimpsing Heat from Alien Technologies) project. Rather than trying to eavesdrop on alien conversations, this innovative “Dysonian” SETI method relies on a much more reliable metric: the unbending laws of thermodynamics. It suggests that no matter how secretive or advanced an alien civilization becomes, it cannot hide its waste heat.

Read more

u/TomaszNowakowski — 5 days ago
▲ 534 r/exoplanets+1 crossposts

Astronomers find 2 gigantic planets lighter than cotton candy: « Comparable to a nice blob of shaving foam. »

cbsnews.com
u/fchung — 8 days ago

Direct Imaging Discovery of Giant Exoplanet β Pictoris d

(text post because it's one of those two papers on arχiv on the same day situations).

A 3rd planet in everyone's favorite edge-on disk system was found by teams using the VLT and JWST, with initial orbit (~30 au), mass (~2-4 Jupiters), and atmospheric features (including CO2 and water): via https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.23789 and https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.23801

u/UmbralRaptor — 6 days ago

Hi. Im new to this community

Do most or all gas giant exoplanets look like this? smooth banded unlike looking like jupiter all wavy swirly ocean-wave violent bands? Are these smooth banded planets like the image I showed possible?

u/Proud-Sorbet-1509 — 7 days ago
▲ 5 r/exoplanets+2 crossposts

What frustrates professional astrophysicists about current exoplanet detection algorithms?

I'm part of a student team working on an AI-based exoplanet transit detection pipeline using TESS light curves for a hackathon.

We're building a system that detects periodic dips, classifies them (transit, eclipsing binary, false positive, noise, blends, etc.), and estimates parameters like period, depth, and duration.

I'd love to hear from people who have worked with TESS, Kepler, exoplanet surveys, or astronomical time-series data:

  • What are the biggest pain points with current transit detection pipelines?
  • What types of false positives cause the most trouble?
  • What information do existing tools fail to provide clearly?
  • What would make candidate vetting faster or more reliable?
  • Are there common mistakes student projects make when working with light curves?
  • If you could add one feature to existing exoplanet detection software, what would it be?

I'm especially interested in issues around noisy data, crowded fields, blending, uncertainty estimation, explainability, and candidate ranking.

reddit.com
u/ppskychoubey — 12 days ago
▲ 8 r/exoplanets+3 crossposts

Building a continuous tidal-locking habitability index for exoplanets, looking for a sanity check on the approach

I'm a final-year CS undergrad working independently on a habitability scoring framework for tidally locked exoplanets, and I'd like feedback from people who actually work in this space before I take it further.

The motivation: ESI has no stellar environment term at all. SEPHI only touches tidal locking indirectly, through a magnetic-field scaling in one of its four sub-indexes. HITE (Barnes, Meadows & Evans 2015) doesn't include tidal locking as a formula component in any form. Barnes (2017) computes lock timescales but doesn't turn that into a habitability score. So as far as I can tell, nothing maps the full rotational spectrum — freely rotating through spin-orbit resonance to synchronous lock — onto a continuous habitability number. Planets in intermediate spin states get forced into a binary label that doesn't reflect their actual physical regime.

My approach (TLHI): compute a tidal lock probability P_lock = 1 − exp(−age/τ_lock) using the Peale formulation,

then blend two scores: P_lock × TLHI + (1 − P_lock) × SEPHI.

The TLHI component itself folds in five factors specific to locked/near-locked planets — terminator-zone habitability fraction, atmospheric heat-transport efficiency (Cowan & Agol 2011), tidal heating flux, day-night temperature gradient, and XUV-driven atmospheric escape (Ribas 2005 scaling).

Phase 1 (the SEPHI/HZD filtering pipeline) is done and validated against published Kepler-442 b numbers.

Phase 2 (the TLHI layer itself) is in progress — currently working through the tidal locking probability layer on a 181-candidate dataset(after analysis) from the NASA Exoplanet Archive.

Two open questions I haven't resolved yet, if anyone has thoughts:

  1. Albedo assumption for the terminator-zone factor — blackbody (A=0) or Earth-like?
  2. How to handle the nightside temperature floor when atmospheric pressure data is missing — is an Earth-like pressure prior defensible, or too strong an assumption?

Not looking for co-authorship or mentorship, just want to know if the underlying physics holds up before I go further. Happy to share more detail on any part of it.

reddit.com
u/Lucky_Jeweler2773 — 12 days ago
▲ 3 r/exoplanets+1 crossposts

I built a free app to browse all 6,000+ NASA confirmed exoplanets in 3D — would love this community's feedback

Hey folks, hope you're all doing well 👋

So I've built an app called Exoplanets: Planets & Space — a little passion project for anyone who, like me, falls down the exoplanet rabbit hole at 2am.

It pulls from the NASA Exoplanet Archive, so it's real confirmed-planet data, and lets you:

  • Browse 6,000+ exoplanets, each rendered as a 3D planet colored by its actual temperature/type
  • See an ML-based habitability estimate (clearly labelled as a rough educational guess, not gospel)
  • Explore star systems with their orbits, and compare planets side by side
  • Get a daily space fact (Dyson spheres, the Dark Forest theory, TRAPPIST-1, etc.)

It's completely free. I'm sharing it here mainly because I'd genuinely love feedback from people who actually know this stuff. Did I get any of the science framing wrong? What would you want to see in an exoplanet app?

Link: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.app.exoplanethunter

Thanks for taking a look 🚀

u/Immediate-Buy1871 — 13 days ago