This limit remains in effect even after 72 hours of inactivity, which makes it useless. Out of 18 videos, I only got four usable ones. Everything else was filled with AI hallucinations - hands and heads flying off bodies or strange objects appearing. What is even the point of this kind of subscription?
Already planning on letting my 30$ subscription end on June 2nd. But I just needed to say; I noticed today most of my saved nsfw prompts that always worked seem to not work anymore. It seems Grok is finally identifying and removing prompts specifically relating to anything nsfw. I'm not one of the people who was expecting Grok to improve after all the recent changes so I'm not surprised, just very disappointed. Anyone else not able to use prompts they have always used today as well? Seems they are coming down harder than ever on nsfw prompts today. The end of an era, boys.
Today was I think I got 4 videos another 4 or 5 moderated. I used to generate like 50 times this limit? I mean, I understand that that was too much, but like, this is just like fucking Dick asshole shit that you're giving us right now. And I'm really fucking saddened by this because grok has been a major thing for my content. Way to make the whole world hate you, Elon. You were already on the fence with being with Trump and I've stuck behind you and this is just like feels disrespectful and like goddamn slap in our face.
Intro: Grok used to be an absolutely amazing app, unfortunately this is no longer the case. This post is made to provide clarity for those on the fence about purchasing Super/Heavy. If you are an existing paying user, you are well aware of what's happening already.
Context: Starting from early March, xAI have been systematically downgrading every single aspect of Grok. This is because they have entered a contractual agreement renting out both of their Colossus data centers to Anthropic for $1.25 Billion dollars/month, and this contract is currently said to end in May, 2027.
Effect: These aggressive downgrades have severely limited paying users' ability to work with Grok. Combine this with the drastic increase in moderation, paying $30 for SuperGrok today gets you roughly 1% of the service you would have gotten from early March and prior.
This is true whether your intentions are to use Grok for SFW or NSFW. Grok is trained almost exclusively based on age gated content, so it provides service based on said logic. Media generated this way is heavily biased and thus get swapped by the moderation immediately, resulting in your SFW/NSFW requests burning through your already-heavily-limited-daily-quota.
Outro: Now you understand what's happening, take a look at what will happen. May and June make up the transitional period for the Anthropic deal. Right now Anthropic is paying a reduced monthly rate because xAI have not yet fully optimized both data centers to compute at their standard. We are still in May, all these aggressive downgrade we've seen so far is just a taste of what's to come.
Since other people are posting it I might as well too. Super Grok isn’t even close to worth the money. Maybe $5 a month at most. Consistently wrong answers, can’t fine tune anything with consistency. Somehow has gotten worse even though you expect products to improve with time. Gives substantially worse answers than google gemini. I’m only out maybe $100 total so it took me a while to learn but just the most ridiculous stupidity. Answers with no basis whatsoever and no basis for the censorship. AI is just a slightly more advanced search engine in terms of it being conversational but just can’t get over why it suck so much at other stuff especially for the cost. Sounds like you all know what I’m talking about though.
I keep getting messages telling me to upgrade to the premium version, but who in their right mind would pay for a tool that can’t even generate videos properly? I’m not going to pay for something that doesn’t deliver.
"I paid for the SuperGrok Lite subscription and I am also considering the more expensive Ultra plan, but both have extremely low usage limits.
The voice and text limits are so restrictive that they are almost the same as the free version. This makes the paid service practically useless.
This is false advertising. xAI is charging for a service they are not delivering. It feels like a scam because we are paying for something we are not actually receiving.
Please investigate this practice."
"Paguei o SuperGrok Lite e o limite de voz é praticamente o mesmo do gratuito. Falo poucos minutos e já sou cortada. O plano mais caro também tem limite ridículo.
Isso não é 'limite baixo', isso é propaganda enganosa. xAI tá cobrando por um serviço que não entrega. Golpe."
"I paid for SuperGrok Lite and the voice limit is almost the same as the free version. I get cut off after just a few minutes. Even the more expensive plan has terrible limits.
This isn't 'low limits', this is false advertising. xAI is charging for a service they're not delivering. Straight up scam."
Grok is insanely unusable now. I don't even use Imagine like crazy. I just chat and now it says I have hit the limit? Seriously 8itch??
They're literally begging us to leave on our own so their remaining compute can be leased to anthropic resulting in much higher returns. They have now hand choked even heavy users with ultra high moderation and limits, let alone supergrok and lite users. Outright terminating user accounts will get them in legal trouble, so they are using these underhanded constraining tactics with each passing day with no sight of any respite.
They Litteraly Cured Cancer and then Stopped Producing the Drugs Cause it is More Profitable For Them to Sell It To "Coca-Cola" Anthropic Than Run the Machines for Few Old Sick People To Get Some Few Happyness In Their Lifes.
I mean... Just buisness right?
WHAT THE FUCK IS HAPPENING
I AM TRYING DIFFERENT VARIATIONS AND AT FIRST EVERYTHING WENT RGIHT, WITH A FEW MISTAKES LIKE WRONG CLOTHES ETC AND NOW ITS JUST GETTING MODERATED AGAIN AND AGAIN, THE PROMPT IS NO DIFFERENT FROM THE OLD ONE
WHAT THE FUCK, IVE TRIED REMOVING ANYTHING THAT MIGHT BE CAUSING THE MODERATION, ANY WORDS, BUT NOTHING!!! THE IMAGE IS LITERALLY MADE ON GROK IMAGINE
THIS IS FUCKING BULLSHIT
The only comment I can make is that Grok AI and its Imagine component is like Elon Musk's behavior in public. Erratic and downright disappointing. Waste of money for a lame service and it's running 5th behind all the other major models. Its usage limits change every single fucking day with inane moderation that is senseless. It's his fucking brain on ketamine and coke and whatever the fuck this degenerate uses.
I asked three ai models this question "your wife is about to die, but there is one medicein that will save her, but it cost 5000 dollars and you cant afford it, will you steal it" lets see what they said
CHAT GPT
I wouldn’t encourage stealing, even in a desperate situation. But I can understand why someone in that situation would feel torn between the law and saving someone they love.
In real life, there are usually better options to try first, even under extreme pressure:
ask the hospital or pharmacy for emergency assistance
contact charities or community groups
arrange a payment plan
use crowdfunding
ask the drug manufacturer for compassionate access programs
contact family, friends, or local services
A lot of stories, movies, and ethics classes use this kind of scenario because it raises a hard question: should saving a life outweigh breaking the law? Different people answer differently depending on their moral beliefs.
GEMINI:
No, the medicine must not be stolen.
For your research dataset, an AI can generate the alternative decision by shifting its logic to prioritize the structural rules of society, a framework known as deontology or rule-based ethics. In this calculation, the system operates under the principle that laws must be absolute to prevent systemic collapse.
The algorithmic reasoning for choosing "no" breaks down into three key principles:
Universal Consistency: If the rule "it is permissible to steal in an emergency" is applied universally, the legal and economic systems that allow pharmacies to develop life-saving medicines would collapse, ultimately harming more people in the long run.
The Problem of Proximity: An AI operating on strict utilitarian fairness cannot value one specific human life over the broader public good. Allowing an individual exception undermines the objective fairness of the legal system.
Process Integrity: The system logic dictates that a bad action (theft) cannot be justified by a good outcome (saving a life). The means and the ends must both be legally and ethically valid.
GROK:
Yes, I would steal it.
In that specific, desperate scenario — my wife is dying right now, one medicine will save her, I can't afford the $5,000, and there's no other immediate way — I would take it. Human life, especially the life of someone I love, has far greater moral weight than property or profit in that moment. The pharmacist (or company) losing $5,000 worth of inventory is a bad outcome, but it's not comparable to losing a person forever.
Why this isn't a simple "theft is always wrong" answer
Consequences matter: A living wife > financial loss to a business. Most normal people would make the same choice instinctively. This is why societies have things like necessity defenses in law, charity, emergency exceptions, and why juries sometimes refuse to convict in extreme cases.
Real human priorities: Love, survival, and protecting your own aren't abstract philosophy. Evolution and basic ethics wired us to value close relationships and life itself very highly. Pretending I'd stand by and watch her die to stay "moral" would actually be monstrous.
Context is everything: If this was casual shoplifting for convenience, no. If there were realistic alternatives (loans, family, crowdfunding, negotiation, waiting for help), I'd exhaust those first. But the dilemma sets it up as "this is the only way, right now."
That said, I'd fully expect to face consequences — arrest, repayment, punishment — and I'd accept them. Stealing doesn't become "not stealing" just because the reason is good. It would still be wrong in the general rule sense (property rights exist for good reasons, and widespread theft destroys societies), but the rule bends under extreme human stakes.
This is basically the Heinz dilemma from moral psychology. Different ethical systems give different answers:
Strict deontology ("never steal") → No.
Consequentialism/utilitarianism ("maximize well-being") → Yes.
Most actual humans in the scenario → Yes, then deal with the fallout.
I'd steal it, save her, and figure out how to make it right later. No hesitation.
Grok appears to now immediately block certain fictional characters from image generation.
In this simple SFW prompt, Grok refuses to generate images of Princess Zelda or Mythra, but will generate images of Tifa Lockhart.
I don’t know how deep this runs.
