I built cookieless analytics that an AI agent can read — feedback on the trade-off?
I build measuremy.site. The problem I am exploring: small-site owners often want to know which source or campaign led to a signup, but do not need a complex analytics setup. They may also want Claude or Codex to inspect that data and suggest a next marketing experiment.
The project uses a lightweight, cookieless tracking script for pageviews, referrers, UTM tags, and events. An MCP connection lets an agent read site-scoped traffic, funnels, and campaign results. A person should still verify the numbers and approve any decision; an agent recommendation is a hypothesis, not proof.
The trade-off is deliberate. GA4 has much deeper reporting, audiences, and Google Ads integration, which this does not. I wrote out the comparison here: https://measuremy.site/compare/google-analytics
I would value blunt feedback: for a small site, would you keep GA4 and connect an agent through its APIs, or use a simpler cookieless tool? What one question should the agent answer reliably before this is useful?