r/pennystocks_No_Rules

▲ 87 r/pennystocks_No_Rules+12 crossposts

Vancouver, British Columbia--(Newsfile Corp. - April 24, 2026) - Herbal Dispatch Inc. (CSE: HERB) (OTCQB: LUFFF) (FSE: HA9) ("Herbal Dispatch" or the "Company"), announces its financial results for the fourth quarter and year ended December 31, 2025.

Q4 2025 HIGHLIGHTS

Gross sales of $6.2 million, representing a 115% increase compared to $2.9 million in Q4 2024

Net revenue of $4.1 million (excluding excise taxes), up from $2.3 million in Q4 2024

Adjusted EBITDA of $0.1 million, compared to $(0.6) million in Q4 2024

Adjusted EBITDA of $0.2 million excluding non-recurring costs related to investor relations and financing

FY 2025 HIGHLIGHTS

Gross sales of $16.5 million, representing a 37% increase compared to $12.1 million in 2024

Net revenue of $12.1 million (excluding excise taxes), up from $9.9 million in 2024

Adjusted EBITDA of $(0.7) million, improved from $(1.0) million in 2024

Gross margin improved to approximately 22.7% in 2025, compared to 20.1% in 2024, reflecting enhanced cost of goods efficiency, improved product mix, and increasing scale across the Company's platform and the Company expects continued improvement into 2026 as scale and operating leverage continues to increase.

STRATEGIC MOMENTUM

Completed an oversubscribed non-brokered private placement, raising $2.1 million in October 2025

Commenced trading on the OTCQB® Venture Market under the ticker LUFFF subsequent to year end

FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE

For the three months ended December 31, 2025, gross sales increased by 115% to $6.2 million compared to $2.9 million in Q4 2024. Net revenue, excluding excise taxes, increased to $4.1 million compared to $2.3 million in the prior year quarter. The increase was driven by higher sales volumes across both medical and recreational channels and continued growth within the Company's e-commerce platform.

As of this period, the Company's path to profitability is increasingly driven by expanding gross margins, with gross profit growing to $2.75 million in 2025 from $2.0 million in 2024, reflecting improved cost of goods sold efficiency and increasing operating leverage across the platform.

Gross profit improved in Q4 2025 as a result of increased scale and improving operating efficiencies. Cost of goods sold as a percentage of sales declined year-over-year, reflecting enhanced purchasing power, optimized product mix, and improved supply chain execution. This expansion in gross margin is a key driver of the Company's path to sustained profitability and operating leverage.

Adjusted EBITDA improved significantly in Q4 2025 to positive $0.1 million, compared to negative $0.6 million in Q4 2024, driven primarily by increased scale and improved gross margins. Excluding certain non-recurring investor relations costs and professional fees related to the October 2025 private placement, adjusted EBITDA for Q4 2025 would have been positive $0.2 million.

For the full year ended December 31, 2025, adjusted EBITDA improved by 30% to negative $0.7 million compared to negative $1.0 million in 2024, reflecting continued progress toward profitability.

MANAGEMENT COMMENTARY

"The fourth quarter of 2025 marked a major step forward for Herbal Dispatch, as we delivered record quarterly gross sales and achieved positive adjusted EBITDA," said Philip Campbell, President & CEO of Herbal Dispatch. "We have now achieved double-digit growth for the third consecutive year, reflecting the strength of our platform, our customer relationships, and our ability to expand across both Canadian and international markets."

"Looking ahead to 2026, our focus remains on scaling profitably, expanding our recreational footprint, growing medical sales-particularly among veterans-and accelerating export growth into federally legal international markets. With strong sales momentum and the added visibility of our OTCQB listing, we believe we are well-positioned to create long-term value for shareholders."

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Company's consolidated financial statements and management's discussion & analysis for the year ended December 31, 2025 are available on the Company's profile on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca and will also be posted on the Company's website at www.herbaldispatch.com.

ABOUT HERBAL DISPATCH INC.

Herbal Dispatch Inc. is a leading operator of cannabis e-commerce platforms in Canada, delivering quality medical and recreational products to discerning consumers at competitive prices. Its flagship marketplace has earned trust as a premier destination for exclusive access to small-batch craft cannabis and a wide selection of curated cannabis products. The Company is also actively expanding through exports to international markets, positioning it for sustained growth and new revenue opportunities. The Company's common shares trade on the Canadian Securities Exchange under the symbol "HERB".

For further information: Philip Campbell, CEO and Director Email: IR@herbaldispatch.com Telephone: 1-833-432-2420

NON-IFRS MEASURES

Adjusted EBITDA is defined as earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation, amortization, share based compensation, loss (gain) on disposal of assets, loss (gain) on investments, loss (gain) on extinguishment of debt, impairment losses, loss (gain) on foreign exchange and accretion expense. The Company believes that, in addition to net income (loss), adjusted EBITDA is a useful measure as it provides an indication of the financial results generated by its principal business activities prior to consideration of how these activities are financed or how the results are taxed in various jurisdictions and before certain non-cash items such as depreciation, amortization, and other items. Adjusted EBITDA does not have any standardized meaning as prescribed by IFRS and therefore, is considered a non-IFRS measure and may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers.

A reconciliation of net loss to adjusted EBITDA for each of the periods presented in this news release follows:

https://api.newsfilecorp.com/redirect/vEYvOIoRm1

$HERB.CN / OTC: $LUFFF

u/The_Insider_Edge — 23 hours ago

Do investors underestimate asset-backed angles in small caps?

Feels like people focus heavily on future growth narratives while ignoring whether a company has any underlying asset base at all.
One reason TROO stood out to me is that it isn’t purely story-driven from what I’ve seen.

reddit.com
u/shirochilo — 2 days ago

Interesting trend among smaller fintech-focused companies

I’ve been noticing more companies trying to connect traditional finance with newer digital infrastructure. Some fail completely, obviously, but Troops, Inc. seems to be actively positioning itself in that direction. Curious whether people think that model becomes more common over time.

reddit.com
u/Aishashhahh — 3 days ago

Why do some small companies stay unnoticed for so long?

I’ve been thinking about how certain smaller companies can operate for a long time without much attention from the broader market. It’s not always about performance, sometimes it’s just visibility, liquidity, or lack of coverage.
I’m curious how others approach this space. Do you actively look for overlooked small caps, or avoid them completely because of the uncertainty?

reddit.com
u/Aishashhahh — 4 days ago

What matters more in small caps: clarity or optionality?

A very focused business is easier to understand, but broader businesses sometimes have more long-term upside if execution is real. I’ve been torn on this while evaluating a few companies, including TROO.

Where do you usually land?

reddit.com
u/Infamous-Chart-4347 — 4 days ago

Do multi-business companies in small caps usually work out long term?

I’ve noticed some smaller companies try to operate across multiple areas instead of focusing on a single core business.

Sometimes that gives them flexibility, but other times it just makes the business harder to track. $TROO is one of the names I saw where the structure looks like it spans lending and a few other financial directions.

Not really forming a conclusion yet, just trying to understand if that kind of setup tends to help or dilute performance over time.

reddit.com
u/Weekly_Box6675 — 4 days ago

When does a small-cap become investable?

Some people buy purely on vision. Others won’t touch anything until numbers are fully established.

Personally, I’m most interested in the awkward middle stage where a company has enough real operations to matter but still feels early.

How do you define that point?

reddit.com
u/Infamous-Chart-4347 — 5 days ago

Anyone else like following under-the-radar public companies?

Not necessarily because they’re investments right away, but because smaller or lesser-known public companies can be more interesting to study than giant caps everyone already knows. Been going through a few lately including Troops, Inc. and a couple others in adjacent sectors.

reddit.com
u/Aishashhahh — 5 days ago

What makes you revisit a stock more than once?

Usually if I keep returning to a name, it means there’s something unresolved about my view on it. That’s been the case for me with TROO. Not necessarily conviction, just one of those companies that keeps making me reassess.

Anyone else have names like that?

reddit.com
u/Weekly_Box6675 — 5 days ago

Market loves simple stories, but businesses aren’t always simple

Sometimes a company gets overlooked simply because investors can’t immediately categorize it. Is it finance? Property? Fintech? Asset play?

TROO kinda sits in that weird middle ground, which probably explains why opinions on it seem pretty divided.

reddit.com
u/Weekly_Box6675 — 6 days ago

Do investors underestimate asset-backed angles in small caps?

Feels like people focus heavily on future growth narratives while ignoring whether a company has any underlying asset base at all.

One reason TROO stood out to me is that it isn’t purely story-driven from what I’ve seen.

reddit.com
u/Infamous-Chart-4347 — 6 days ago

Some stocks don’t move on fundamentals first

Been noticing how some names just sit ignored for months until one random catalyst changes the entire conversation overnight.

Not even saying that’s guaranteed here, but that’s partly why I keep side-eyeing names like TROOPS, Inc..

Sometimes the market prices in the business late and prices in the narrative early.

reddit.com
u/Infamous-Chart-4347 — 7 days ago

Is the market too impatient with transition-stage companies?

Feels like investors want immediate clarity from businesses still evolving. Sometimes a company is messy simply because it’s in the middle of becoming something else. $TROO gives me that impression.

reddit.com
u/Infamous-Chart-4347 — 8 days ago
▲ 24 r/pennystocks_No_Rules+23 crossposts

Real Stock Analysis and news.

First, In the market discord real time stock analysis, information and data. We provide daily refresh/analysis calls and more. 
We made 3 calls in the last 4 days and have seen a return of 150+%
TSM Call Today 399$, Current price 415$ (200+%)
PBR PUT 2 Days ago 21$, Yesterday Sold at 18$ (95%)
FCX 2 Days Ago was at 61$, Yesterday Sold For 67$ (145%+)

These are all recent index calls we have made and seen a huge return on. 
Always Do You're Own Due Diligence. 

Join Today For 3 Days Free Than 8$ a month --> https://whop.com/joined/wallstreet-watchlist/  

u/Fragrant_Mix4384 — 9 days ago

How do you value companies still building their identity?

Sometimes these early-stage companies are hard to place because the business model is still expanding. I ended up reading about Troo and found the combination of lending plus asset exposure pretty unusual. Not sure whether the market rewards that or discounts it.

reddit.com
u/Outrageous-Train-751 — 8 days ago

Sometimes the market needs time to organize a narrative

Not every company fits neatly into one investor bucket immediately.
That delay can make a name more interesting than the actual chart.
TROO kinda gives me that impression.

reddit.com
u/Bikram0677 — 7 days ago

What makes a small-cap actually worth following long term?

I usually look beyond price action first. Business direction, management decisions, and whether the company is clearly trying to evolve matter more to me. $TROO is one I’ve been casually tracking through that lens.

reddit.com
u/Weekly_Box6675 — 8 days ago

Anyone else researching overlooked fintech microcaps lately? Anyone here actively research microcaps beyond the usual hype names?

Feels like most discussions online rotate around the same popular stocks, so I’ve been spending more time looking into smaller fintech and lending-related companies that don’t get much attention.

What interests me most are businesses trying to evolve beyond their original model instead of staying static. Recently came across one that started around lending but is also expanding into fintech and asset-related areas. Still early and execution matters a lot, but interesting to follow.

Microcaps are obviously risky, though sometimes researching lesser-followed companies is more interesting than chasing crowded trades.

reddit.com
u/sweetupriya — 8 days ago

The market eventually notices changing narratives

A company can trade quietly for months until one or two developments make investors reframe the entire story. That rerating process is always interesting to watch. $TROO seems like it could fall into that category if execution stays consistent.

reddit.com
u/Lordpadoo — 9 days ago

How do you usually spot when a small company is actually “changing phase”?

Sometimes I struggle to tell when a small company is just staying the same versus actually shifting into something more structured.
On paper, a lot of them say they’re expanding or diversifying, but it’s not always clear what that looks like in practice.
I’ve been looking at different small financial names and $TROO came up in that mix, mainly because it doesn’t feel strictly limited to one line of business anymore.
Still trying to figure out if that kind of transition usually leads anywhere meaningful or just stays as positioning.

reddit.com
u/shirochilo — 10 days ago