How reliable is Galileo NIMS data for hyperspectral anomaly detection on Europa?
I’m working with Galileo NIMS data from Europa, specifically the GO_1116 and GO_1117 observations, and I’m trying to understand how reliable these datasets are for hyperspectral anomaly detection.
I’d like to know:
How well calibrated are the GO_1116 and GO_1117 NIMS cubes for spectral analysis?
How much instrumental noise or calibration-related artifacts should I expect?
Are there known problematic wavelengths/bands or bad pixels that should be removed or masked?
Could apparent spectral anomalies be caused by the instrument or data processing rather than actual surface variations?
Are the `*_core.cub` products appropriate for this type of analysis?
Is there a recommended preprocessing or calibration workflow before performing spectral analysis?
How confidently can unusual spectral signatures in these datasets be interpreted as real surface/compositional differences?
I’d especially appreciate input from anyone who has worked with Galileo NIMS data, GO_1116/GO_1117, or Europa spectroscopy.
Any recommendations for relevant calibration documentation or papers would also be really helpful. Thanks!