
Topic for discussion: is it folly to adapt Robert E. Howard 100% faithfully?
REH was a pulp writer and a world-class pro at selling to that market.
His stories are perfect for the pulp format.
But in adapting his material to any other medium, I think that being faithful to the concept and the spirit of the original work is more important than a slavish, note-for-note transcription.
When I started adapting “Jewels of Gwalhur” as a series of storyboards, I quickly found out that complete adherence to the text was just not going to work for the audio-visual medium of live-action streaming.
In the sample I've shared here, art by Miguel Guzman, you might spot that even this early in the adaptation, I've made a change.
Can you see in this shot how I've already deviated from Howard's story?
Purists might bristle at any change in the master's canon, but purism can hog-tie an adaptation.
If you want a deeper look at my adaptation of "Jewels," and my view on comics in general, it'll be here: