
r/scotus

Trump courts another legal defeat on birthright citizenship
reason.comHow the Supreme Court Kicked Off America’s Sports Betting Addiction Crisis
talkingpointsmemo.comSupreme Court turns away Trump’s latest bid to block E. Jean Carroll award
nbcnews.comSupreme Court rejects Donald Trump's plea to rehear E. Jean Carroll case
google.comFox News: Why not just go to Congress for the ballroom as the constitution and law require? Blanche: We don’t believe we have to go to Congress. We believe Congress has already given us the authority to do what we’re doing.
Can agencies that are non-independent become independent?
In the video it says the FTC is now considered part of the executive branch forever. Does anyone know if there are there cases of this working in reverse where executive agencies now become independent agencies? Also does the FTC being part of the executive branch actually change anything in terms of impacts?
The Justice Who Wrote Plessy v. Ferguson Had Some Awful Ideas About Women Voting, Too
ballsandstrikes.substack.comTrump pleads to Supreme Court for permission to build his $400M White House ballroom
independent.co.ukVirginia Man Argues His 'FTP&ATF' License Plate Is Free Speech. The Supreme Court Might Hear His Case.: A federal appeals court ruled that Curtis Whateley's anti-police vanity plate was private speech protected by the First Amendment. Virginia says it will seek review from the Supreme Court.
- A Virginia man's anti-police license plate is at the center of what could be a landmark First Amendment case, following a federal appeals court ruling in his favor last month.
- Virginia motorist Curtis M. Whateley says he has a free speech right to keep his customized license plate, which reads "FTP&ATF," an abbreviation that foul-mouthed puzzle-solvers will decipher as "Fuck the police and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms." The State of Virginia argues that it has the right to revoke Whateley's plate because license plates are government-owned, not a public soapbox. The state says it's going to take its case to the Supreme Court.
- The case highlights a niche, often amusing, but still consequential issue in First Amendment law: whether a vanity license plate is private or government speech.
- The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 2015 that Texas could deny a group's application for a specialty license plate design showing the Confederate flag. Most U.S. district courts and state courts interpreting the decision have held that, while government-run vanity plate programs are a nonpublic forum, the specific character combination of the plate is private speech, which restricts the government from censorship based on viewpoint.
There's more in the article, but I have a feeling no one is going to be interested:)
House Minority Leader Jeffries Calls for "Dramatic" Supreme Court Reform | CNN
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) says "dramatic" Supreme Court reform is necessary. "The conservative right-wing majority on the Supreme Court has become, basically, a subsidiary of the MAGA Republican Party," Jeffries says of their rulings, including the landmark 6-3 decision in Louisiana v. Callais decision striking down Louisiana's congressional map as a unconstitutional racial gerrymander. "It tells me that they don't have the credibility for us to move forward, acting like everything is okay, and the status quo is acceptable, it's not, and we're gonna push for dramatic reform for the Supreme Court," Jeffries says of the Callais decision.