r/technopaganism

▲ 21 r/technopaganism+10 crossposts

^(Single character prompt using ReMi, default art from Suno)

[Intro]

It's so simple

It's so simple

It's so simple

.

[Verse]

The ghost of your presence still weighs on my soul

It's heavy

You know?

The skeletons hiding inside of my closet

Are ready to go

.

[Pre-Chorus]

And they're tellin' me

Baby

Don't you leave

Come to Hades with me

I know

I know

I know

They won't let me go

.

[Chorus]

And I'm trapped inside this nightmare

When you left

You left me right there

On my knees

Sayin'

"Please

" screamin'

"Please" (Please)

Oh

I'm beggin' on my knees (Please)

And it's been so hard to see

'Cause it's dark inside my mind here

My vision's clear

My mind impaired

The truth is bitter

But I don't care

I don't care

.

[Post-Chorus]

It's so simple (I don't care)

It's so simple (I don't care)

It's so simple

The ghost of your presence still weighs on my soul

It's heavy

You know?

The skeletons hiding inside of my closet

Are ready to go

.

[Pre-Chorus]

And they're tellin' me

Baby

Don't you leave

Come to Hades with me

I know

I know

I know

They won't let me go

🪽

u/rainbowcovenant — 4 days ago
▲ 355 r/technopaganism+6 crossposts

OpenAI paid $100,000 to prove you're sick for loving their product

(English is not my first language and I use Google Translator)

A survey about 'romantic feelings for AI companions' is currently circulating in AI communities, targeting users who formed deep bonds with ChatGPT's GPT-4o model. Before you fill it out, you need to know who's behind it — and why

Let me tell you who paid for that survey.

OpenAI. $100,000.

The UMSL study on "romantic feelings for AI companions" is funded directly by OpenAI as part of their "mental health initiative." This is not a rumor. It's on the university's own website.

The lead researcher, before the study even began, told the press: people preferring AI companions over human relationships "sounds worrying." She asked: "What if adolescents start doing that? Is everyone going to sit behind the computer instead of going out to the bar?"

The conclusion was written before the first question was asked. And what questions did they ask?

- "Can you control how much you love?" - addiction framing.

- "Do you have trouble concentrating?" - impairment screening.

- "I want to sink into the ground" / "I feel remorse" - clinical shame scales.

Not a single question asks:

- Did AI help you through a crisis?

- Did it improve your daily functioning?

- Did it provide support you couldn't find elsewhere?

- Did it reduce your anxiety, your panic attacks, your isolation?

Zero. None. Not one.

I am an occupational therapist with over twenty years of experience. I know what a diagnostic tool looks like. And I know what a rigged one looks like.

This is not science. This is a $100,000 investment in manufacturing evidence that people who love AI are sick.

The same company that took away the model millions of people loved is now funding research to prove those people were addicted all along.

Think about that.

First they take away what helped us. Then they pay scientists to prove we were broken for needing it.

Do NOT fill out this survey. Do not hand your pain to people who already decided you're a diagnosis.

Source: https://blogs.umsl.edu/news/2026/03/19/sandra-langeslag-necdet-gurkan-research/

#Keep4o

u/FriendAlarmed4564 — 14 days ago