
I think I was looking at ZBCN tokenomics the wrong way
Went pretty deep into Zebec’s tokenomics and there’s one question about ZBCN that completely changed how I looked at it.
I broke it down here

Went pretty deep into Zebec’s tokenomics and there’s one question about ZBCN that completely changed how I looked at it.
I broke it down here
Most people assume that if a project grows users, volume, and revenue, the token will automatically rise with it.
That’s not always true.
ZBCN is an interesting case because it doesn’t have its own blockchain. So the normal “native token” advantages don’t apply the same way.
I put together a breakdown looking at:
• How Zebec tries to route product fees and revenue back into ZBCN
• The difference between buybacks and burns
• What multi-chain expansion means for the token
• Whether the design actually creates demand for ZBCN when the business grows
Curious what others think after watching — does this look like strong tokenomics for an ecosystem token, or is something still missing?