So... who exactly is riding the wild beast now? 🤔
​
I've been thinking about something that I find incredibly ironic.
For decades, Jehovah's Witnesses have taught that the wild beast represents the world's political powers and that the prostitute riding the beast represents the world empire of false religion.
Okay. Let's use that interpretation for a minute.
Norway took action against Jehovah's Witnesses over their practices surrounding disfellowshipping/removal and shunning, including concerns involving minors and people who leave the religion. This affected their registration and government funding.
The organization fought the government through the courts.
Meanwhile, we suddenly got "new light" regarding disfellowshipped people. They're now "removed from the congregation." Witnesses may greet certain removed people at meetings. Elders may meet with someone more than once before removing them. There were also changes involving minors.
Except...
Go read the August 1, 1974 Watchtower, "Maintaining a Balanced Viewpoint Toward Disfellowshiped Ones."
Some of this "new light" looks remarkably familiar.
And now that Jehovah's Witnesses ultimately won their case in Norway, JW social media/news is celebrating the court victory, the restoration of government funding, reimbursement of withheld grants, and the money awarded for legal costs.
Which made me think:
According to their own interpretation, isn't this exactly the kind of relationship with the "wild beast" that they have spent decades criticizing other religions for having?
The political system gives your religion money.
The political system takes the money away.
Your organization goes to court and fights the political system to get the money back.
Then the political system rules in your favor and gives the money back.
And your organization publicly celebrates the victory.
So...
If receiving government support and seeking favorable treatment from political authorities is evidence that "false religion" is riding the wild beast...
What exactly are Jehovah's Witnesses doing here?
Maybe the most interesting question isn't "Who is the prostitute riding the wild beast?"
Maybe it's:
Why does the definition suddenly stop applying when Watchtower is the one collecting the money?