“These (ai) facilities represent real economic opportunity — investment, jobs, and tax revenue for Montana communities,” Bodnar’s campaign noted on an earlier version of his website.
...but nonetheless, Bodnar said Montana needed ai data centers lest “the benefits flow elsewhere. This simply can’t happen.”
"As abhorrent as that might be, going after adults could still be considered protected free speech as condoned by a conservative US Supreme Court’s Citizen United ruling.
"What isn’t protected and voids any protected speech claims, however, was on this spreadsheet Bankhead’s daughter was listed as part of their harassment conspiracy."
BREAKING: The DNC and Seth Bodnar made a list of personal info of Alani Bankhead's close friends & relatives to harass because "she hasn't responded to gentler nudges."
I have a copy of this list & won't post it, but JFC it's disturbing officials in the u/montanademocrats & u/forward_montana collude with a POS women sexual harasser creep like Seth Bodnar to condone trying to intimidate a Latina women's family in 2026 as if they're fking ICE.
Apparently, getting some of Jon Tester's Anthropic ai slop money worth their soul.
"Nonetheless, ai data center oligarchs still aim to crush dissent by buying politicians to do their bidding like they did in Montana all while taking a dismissive mentality towards locals of, “Ai data centers are coming to your community wether you like it or not”—a phrase said politicians have used as well to justify selling-out their constituents."
-Democrat Sam Forstag also condones ai data centers if they are regulated to be environmentally safe, and notes potential positive impacts of ai data centers as a tool to help "cure cancer.”
However, the claim data centers could be “environmentally safe” is an oxymoron seeing as there is no such thing as an environmentally safe ai data center in the first place—especially when ai-slop backed politicians are writing the very definitions of what they deem “safe.”