Album: Trinity (Deluxe Edition)
Release Date: March 30, 2018
Record Label: NewRetroWave Records (NRW Records)
A fusion of newwave & synthrock, quite like this track.
Enjoy
Been hunting out obscure newwave retro tracks and come across this punchy track, propa 80’s disco sound, (nu-disco) its got a synthesized base line, melodic hooks & propa 80’s nostalgic feel to it.
Artist & song name :
BronSon - you did me wrong
CNTW NHS Governance Team denies timestamps exist on my 12-hour access audit trail — even though they sent me the logs with timestamps😳😅 The time stamps are up there! 👆🏻😳
Time stamps add up to 12 hours, is CNTW not doing the maths ? 😂 its a full un-interupted full days access of 12hrs with numerous records viewed & accessed, 12 hours worth of timestamps.
A full 12 hours access triggered by GP’s who likely emailed a refferal in behind my back, defensive medicine playing out while i’m landing on waiting lists for corrective surgery and being diagnosed with physical health issues & GP’s sharing CNTW Data like its candy and anomalos hepatitis diagnosis are appearing on an NHS APP ?
The GP / director mean while has no indemnity insurance for private work, made numerous mendacious disclosures to dvla, then lied in police statements saying they correct even the GMC could’nt deny what exists in dated medical records so upheld part of complaint
Gp/ director has the same cultural & community connections to the executive of CNTW, both invloved and named on legal documents, They Cant be having decisions in my favour as it effects both a primary care surgery & trust = Bias Decisions!
CNTW “ Cant see emails & Time stamps proves nothing , 12 hours ?? , lets have a meeting about systemic issues though “
————————————————————————
CNTW’s Information Governance team just sent me a response that takes gaslighting to a new level.
They acknowledge access to my records on 24 November 2022 by a manager in nhs trust (related to an ARMs referral they claim was open but closed a day later). But then they state that the audit logs “do not provide a detailed breakdown of the exact amount of time spent in records- even though rimestamps add up to 12hrs… 12hrs” and imply there are effectively no usable timestamps 😅🤯😂 btw this is a refferal i wasnt aware of 💀
.
Just Look at the screenshots. These are the exact audit logs they disclosed to me. Clear timestamps showing repeated access from 8:30am in the morning through to 8:20pm a full 12 hours of access documented and dated,
CNTW “time stamps dont exist”
— dozens of Read, view_Client, progress notes, AmsReferral entries, etc. That is not a quick triage, i wast even part of this Nhs trusts & its likely a GP triggered this refferal while trying to over pathologizing myself and blaming diagnosed physical conditions on MH.
———————————————————————-
I 100% believe it was triggered by my GP practice, which had been engaging in diagnostic overshadowing (blaming physical conditions like sleep apnea on mental health). Yet they still refuse to disclose who actually made the referral.
———————————————————————
On witheld emails:
Their own Email Reproduction Checklist shows multiple folders with emails marked “N” or “Unable to print (permission denied)”. But the governance response flatly claims no emails were withheld except irrelevant third-party information — even though those emails are directly connected to my case and the referral.
This is the core problem: they are denying the existence of evidence that they themselves provided. Two years of back-and-forth on data access, sharing, and record transparency, and this is the standard of response.
*Attaching the key screenshots from their letter + the contradicting audit logs + the email checklist*
Out right denial of dated documents & blatent gaslighting & repeated attempts to refuse to acknowledge ovbious breaches of gdpr violations.
Its a full 12 hours worth of access, timestamped and dated !!!
When primary care & a nhs trust collide with senior nhs individuals you get :
completing medical forms they should’nt &
———————————————————————-
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cp866qlmne7o
https://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/news/24591707.millions-paid-tewv-cntw-patients-negligence/
https://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/news/north-east-news/nhs-mental-health-scandals-exposed-25419425.amp
https://www.hundredfamilies.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Odessa-Carey-APR-19-PFD.pdf
Northubria police stipulated in previous email the following when sent dated documents in email to support my complaint to the PPS of a malcious prosecution arising in civil disputes 👇🏻
I must reiterate that Northumbria Police have no involvement, authority, or responsibility in matters concerning these public bodies.
As such, it would be inappropriate for Northumbria Police to comment upon, intervene in, or correspond regarding issues that fall entirely outside its remit and jurisdiction.
This is Northumbria’s police’s ‘NOW’ position after doing exactly the above, the police influenced by a GP Partner / Director of local PCN got actively involved and positioned them selfs in civil matters, re-framed legal requests in emails, re-framed complaints and complex internal NHS disputes as haraasment and as derogatory allegations.
The individual / GP / Director wasnt insured for private NHS work, claimed all disclosures were correct to DVLA contrary to documented nhs evidence & prescribing dates, The GMC regulatory body admitted some errors directly contradicting a GP’s witness statements.
The very same GP said i was using a medication i wasnt on DVLA forms, the further ticked no side effects to this medication yet its documented in medical file entries and an A&E report that i had side effects from this very same medication.
There’s also an issue regarding an anomalos diagnosis that appeared on NHS App as dvla disclosures were being made, primary care refused all audit requests for this data, the PCN also refused this audit data request twice- the GP is the director of the PCN.
————————————————————————
From the outset certain individuals in these issues took a defensive posture, said both nhs england & NHS Resolution would be informed ( i still have these emails from practice manager ) they never done nothing they said they would.
The GP / Director knew exactly what he was doing making police reports, he then submitted special measure applications in to courts, there was also a further police report made when i requested witnesses to attend court which went directy to a CPS senior prosecutor.
1st image is charge sheet describing the charge
2nd image describes the indemity posistion
(This clearly documents how the GP / Director is not being held accountable for dishonest disclosures to the dvla, he knew he wasnt indemnified, he knew of wider issues while making police statements yet omitted these facts and used police by proxy to his own benefit)
#NhsCorruption
———————————————————————-
part — Section 1(3) defences (England & Wales version):
A course of conduct does not amount to harassment (and is legally allowed) if the person shows it was:
(a) For the purpose of preventing or detecting crime;
(b) Pursued under any enactment/rule of law or to comply with a legal requirement; or
(c) Reasonable in the particular circumstances.
————————————————————————
“Northumbria Police: ‘We have no involvement, authority, or responsibility’ when I hand them GMC findings proving the GP lied in his statement & his disclosures were mendacious, oh and also wasn’t insured for private work, and the medical data they used to convict me was the exact contested data from my SARs subject to on going ICO complaints
Emails full of my own medical records + DVLA SAR info?
Perfect for prosecution.
Actual evidence of dishonesty and flawed case?
‘Sorry, jurisdiction!’ Also wont add to complaint as it proves what you say is correct, we dont work on facts, dated evidence and the truth.
Brilliant. Convict first on dodgy data (emails only) , then plug your ears when the lies come out. Public service at its finest.
😂
#PoliceAccountability #NHSComplaints#Communityprivledges
#charged for making derogatory allegations… which are true, based on facts and dated documents.
I was arrested & had repeated police visits by northumbria police then convicted with out a trial in north east courts.. This was for sending emails while in disputes and involved in civil legal action with senior nhs professionals, locked up for 10hrs emails to senior nhs member outlining complaints with medical evidence attached and SAR Disclosures used as evidence, (the police had previously dropped a case for this exact charge and cited NO EVIDENCE, The GP pushed again and claimed harassment)
This is GP/ Director from a certain community has repeatedly been dishonest, made inaccurate disclosures to the DVLA, knew he wasnt indemnified to do private work has then made malcious police statements feigning fear & harassment while minimizing complaints and claiming all his disclosures were factual… dated prescribing dates, medical data and GMC Corrospondance prove he wasnt being honest when corrobarated with police statement.
The Police standards dept has just been sent uneqivocal evidence of the issues i raised, i attached GMC corrospondance who confirmed/ Upheld parts of me allegations
The police standards dept have reframed an email, took it out of context, refused to even acknowledge the evidence of another / a GP and re-framed the whole email to mean some thing else, clearly not wanting to engage on the fact a GP has been dishonest.
They replied with this
“I am aware of your previous complaint on the same matter. Any complaints or concerns relating to the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA) or the General Medical Council (GMC) must be directed to those organisations in the first instance “
Cant take action or even acknowledge a GP from a certain community has been dishonest even when corrobarated dated documents & police statements show them uneqivocally being dishonest effectively commiting perjury, even GMC Regulatory corrospondance directly contradicts a GP’s statement.
Perfect Example of Two tier policing
If your from a certain community you can lie and manipulate and use the police by proxy.
NHS England has issued new, clear guidance: accessing patient records without a legitimate, work-related reason is "wholly unacceptable" and illegal. They state that "having the ability to view a record is not the same as having a legitimate need to do so".
This is a powerful message—but for alot of us, it feels like an empty one and nothing more than fancy wording!!
My own experiences tells a very different story of failures and institutional protection:
Unauthorized Access:
I have documented evidence (in the attached photos) showing my records were accessed, read, and edited repeatedly by staff at a time when I was no longer a patient of that trust and it was from 8am up until 8pm a full days access by one individual, even when i raised concerns at senior level, my records were actively reviewed, The access and sharing never stopped even when i had active and open ICO complaints and requests in at cntw.
Strangely Cntw’s own DPO states in corrospondance she didnt access my records when replying 😳 but the senior manager of the very same place my data was posted from actively reviewed my records once complaints & data requests were made, the same place left to sign off audit disclosure, the senior managers named is obscured in audit with her name replaced by numbers.
Then Senior executives at cntw described my complaints as ‘service dissatisfaction’ in written corrospondance
if you want to denigrate some one you mis use there data, allow it be shared an accessed by muliple people then deny its ever happend.. then issue fancy new guidance,refuse audit requests, make allegations of harassment and deny a patient the opportunity to safe guard there medical data!
———————————————————————
The Systemic Inaction:
Despite presenting this evidence, I have been met with a pattern of dismissal. Regulatory bodies have repeatedly categorized serious breaches of data integrity as "standard" or "minor," failing to address the fundamental issues of accuracy and unlawful sharing, internal emails revealed staff adding instructions in to emails stating ‘do not add to rio’ and ‘standard complaint’ nearly 3 year of my life has been spent trying to contain my medical data that escaped a clinical enviroment, raw verbatim clinical notes 2 pages in length left embedded in core nhs medical records, even after diagnostic over shadowing in primiary care due to this comprehensive raw data
being shared there, another further adverse event happend directly corrolated to data & due to data being used once again, this time in an adversarial manner…
nothing changed, not for me anyways.
(They didnt want the adverse event recorded in rio records and linked backed to contested data, corrspondance & emails existed with explicit refusals regarding certain data and they also prove i was actively trying to contain medical data)
Both a primiary care practice & trust at fault, both refused to acknowledge issues.
———————————————————————
The "Harassment" Narrative & prosecution :
I’ve even faced accusations of harassment simply for exercising my data rights ( convicted in courts with out a trial )
attempting to contain the unauthorized sharing of my private medical information and also nhs app issues with rouge diagnosis appearing from nowhere, the data lead to diagnostic over shadowing and wider issues and long drawn out disputes
Why does the reality of patient data protection look so different from the official guidance?
We need more than just new rules; we need actual accountability for those who use their position to manipulate records and ignore the law, yet i was prosecuted for actively trying to manage my data, this was in local courts & with out a trial.
Cntw even tried to obscure access from a senior manager in the audit data, the access for 12hrs long also was’nt listed in the names index- they’ve actively worked behind the scences to obscure access & also kept data back- yet nhs england say snooping is illegal & you could face prison time-
I wasnt even part of the trust when 12hrs of access occurred in my old rio records i left some 2 years previously by choice !!!
are cover ups also illegal? , are having prior patients and complainents criminalised for raising concerns & making data requests also illegal ? What about long drawn out degradation of a patient then there criminalised and covicted with out a fair trial.. is that legal ??
NHS Englands new guidance looks well & good but my exeperiences aswell as others looks very different! Those claiming its a criminal offence have made a criminal out of some body who has evidence of repeated access & sharing of his own records, documented and real world consequnces yet due to senior nhs nembers it’s repeatedly minmized.. make that make sense….
The very same emails i sent whereby i attempt to address data issues and data sharing aswell as the ovbious errors in dvla input ended up further shared to northumbria police… the GMC a regulatory body for GP’s even acknowledged mistakes!
Yet, northumbria police than charged me for harassment with out causing fear or violence based on these very same emails which contained screen shots of medical files entries and other personal medical data …
my own medical data in emails was sent to primiary care they then shared this to northumbria police, they used emails as a basis for evidence to form a prosecution of harassment for the benefit of clinicians who were named on legal documents, neither GP partners making witness statements mentioned indeminity involvement, infact the other senior GP Partner done every thing but inform his own indemnity provider,
it was in my view malcious allegations & police used by proxy as i sought audit data & was repeatedly sent back to primary care by senior staff in another nhs trust, the emails the CPS actually use in case file confirm these aspects (i’ve got full disclosure) the emails are indexed in case files as ‘emails to victim outlining his complaints’
The police attemded my home address multiple times And a northumbria police officer who detained me actually attempted & directly asked that i stopped those legally allowed actions / emails / data complaints ☠️😅
(maybe racheal doddworth senior prosecutor of the CPS can answer that one) nudge nudge get him prosecuted & use his own medical data as evidence….. regional crime fighting heroes, a full case based on sending legally allowed emails, the context is i was redirected by others in the nhs to exactly where allegations of harassment originated.
(The CPS, Probation services, Northumbria police & Newcastle Magistrates Court all effectively come together to convict and punitively punish an individual involved in data disputes & negligence civil action- the evidence they used to convict was- ( medical data & emails i sent to a generic email address) it was PERVERSION & SUBVERSION & THE METHOLOGY / TACTIC WAS D.A.R.V.O.)
Every individual i come in to contact with just so happened to be a senior figure!!
————————————————————————
Amyways Read the guidance below:
And :
https://www.cqc.org.uk/about-us/how-we-do-our-job/safeguarding-people
And :
And:
The GPs misused & shared CNTW health records (post my 2019/2020 discharge) despite my explicit instructions against DVLA use.
Historic material was presented as current to bolster a preferred narrative from a GP, medication was pushed to me when i repeatedly said i didnt want it,
physical diagnoses emerged (OSA 2021, sinusitis/ deviated septum/ septum spur).
This was not neutral reporting—it was defensive medicine: protecting the prior record rather than reflecting objective facts (normal tests, sporadic alcohol use only, no dependence diagnosis EVER).
Then a random **Hepatitis** disgnosis appears in NHS App from the very same primiary care practice - repeated refusals exist because of this very thing occurring, they dont want me to know when & how & why this disgnosis occurred in between two seperate DVLA medical questionaires and multiple tests, tests that i passed with very very low percentage scores as per the attached - yet i was re-framed as some one with alcohol issues & a hepatitis diagnosis is randomly appearing on nhs app - THAT AINT NORMAL!!
Broader Institutional Failure & Ethical Breaches:
This defensive stance has spilled into police processes and courts via senior influence and an ignorance that prevails by certain individuald who cant be critized, the family connections and senior influence too important to be questioned or to be challanged, deny deny deny and leave another stranded outside of health care and then pushed in to criminal pathways with false allegations is a preferred method of handling another
a protective ring around the GPs while I am treated as a scapegoat for their errors. Data has been shared widely during my attempts to correct the record.
DVLA letters explicitly confirm their questionnaire content caused the delays and extra testing—objective causation on paper.
The reluctance to acknowledge dated, black-and-white inconsistencies (cross-GP contradictions on Sertraline, OSA, alcohol linkage) is not a stalemate. It is a refusal to admit mistakes at the patient’s expense. Denying evident facts while upending GMC accuracy duties, UK GDPR principles (accuracy, minimisation, purpose limitation), and “putting things right” obligations amounts to institutional gaslighting. Ethics are discarded to shield senior positions, not
To uphold truth or patient safety.
SRA Ethics are non existent as indemnity and others all jump through hoops for those involved and further embed previous issues and then cause wider issues, nearly all processes upended due to others being too ‘special’ agressive tactics used and a further using of data i had explicity said couldnt be used but they used it anyway, A SAR revealed indemity solicitors had’nt posted forms of authority, half filled in forms then after a i reacted they then actively reviwed nexuslexis for tort laws of privacy & the misuse of data (every one wanted to make an impression)😂😅.
One individual up against legal professionals all supporting GP’s, actively defending against objective evidence, each regulatory body denying, minimising, reducing a complaint, each and every one jumping through hoops for senior members of the nhs… all come together as one.
They even utilzed the police by influence, false reports of harassment, repeated visits, the even tried to re-frame legal requests for witnesses sent to the CPS as illegal…. (why not throw the full lot at him)
Its Inversed health care, a multi agency grouping against one man, one individual, one person,
And then what
Deny
Deny
Deny
I’m still here tho👍🏻
The General Medical Council (GMC) has a strict duty to uphold public confidence in the profession. "Selective truth" and misleading official bodies (like the DVLA or police) are direct breaches of their core guidance, Good Medical Practice, which demands absolute honesty. [1, 2]
Yet, there rule 12 team decided the below is minor
cultural ties & community connections are the biggest deciding factors in these matters, not evidence, not a patients wellfare, not laws or rules & there own published regulations, its influence & its biased decision making.
Some interconnected issues relate to CNTW, an executive also sits at board level at the GMC & ICB, they are directly involved in interconnected issues regarding medical data and the trust is also named on official documents & both the surgery & trust had involement in medical data
————————————————————————
1. The Falsification of DVLA Medical Records
my Prior GP practice actively manipulated my dvla medical records/Input :
My Prior GP officially stated that I was taking Sertraline at a time when I absolutely was not, and for a very specific documented reason, He then shared comprehensive raw verbatim clinical notes to the DVLA, (private & confidentitial raw medical)
Erasing Adverse Events:
They ticked "no adverse events" to this medication on official documentation when they incorrectly declared i was using it.
In reality, my medical history and an actual hospital attendance record prove I suffered documented, severe adverse events from this exact prescriped drug its recorded in rio records that i was reporting serious side effects, repeatedly come off medication of my own accord while also refuseing to use this medication, documented & dated, these same rio records have been repeatedly used, & accessed by others even when i was’nt part of this trust (i have full audit data from cntw, albeit it looks like some is missing),
The very place the data was shared from the management here were left to sign off on audit disclosure!
The repeated cntw rio record access occurred from 8am to 8pm on one day (as per cntw audit data), repeated read events, edit and delection events- this access occurred not long after certain disclosures were made to DVLA from primary clinicians and at a time when i wasnt part of nhs cntw, i had left some 2 year prior.
The Forced Medication Pattern:
This follows a long, documented pattern of another GP repeatedly trying to force me onto medications I did not want and had actively taken myself off, I told others in another nhs trust of the side effects, i then got diasgnosed with physical health conditions i knew i had, the very same GP who i pushed for refferal didnt want to acknowledge this physical health condition.
this made sense of wider health issues, then i ended up on waiting list for corrective surgery, they still persisted with a need for me to be on a certain medication while playing dwn physical disgnosed health issues, yet they then challanged me on medication that helped prevent episodes of the physical diagnosed condition i had & made various medical file issues.
______________________________________
2. Dishonest DVLA Disclosures
Using these fabricated medical records, the GP made inaccurate and highly damaging disclosures to the DVLA, severely impacting my independence.
When challenged, the GP doubled down, submitting official police witness statements alleging that I was harassing them. In those statements, they claimed under oath that all of their disclosures to the DVLA were completely "honest and based on facts." Yet the GMC Rule 12 team acknowledged some minor mistakes in disclosures, they had no choice in truth as dated and documented evidence exists in medical file of prescribing history proving i was’nt on the medication a senior GP / Director declared that i was using.
A Hepatitis Disgnosis also originated from this very same GP practice in between two dvla medicals, this is a condition i’ve never had nor had treatment for, they’ve refused repeated requests for the nhs app audit data so i can establish when, how and what way that diagnosis come about, they’ve then shared internal nhs corrspondance i sent directly to the practice with attached medical evidence to the police ( a further infringment ) but done so to try cement a ‘harassment’ narrative based on ‘making derogatory allegations’ which is a further intresting aspect in these matters as the pattern continues in police statments yet i’m being charged / criminlised & prosecuted for being honest, and my allegations or ‘derogatory allegations’ are based on facts, dated documents, medical evidence & signed documents!!
There’s a pattern of denial, refusals, and outright attempts to cover up certain issues & events and certain professional bodies have embarrisingly assisted another while refusing to acknowledge dated material evidence.
______________________________________
3. The Paper Trail They Couldn't Hide
The GP’s narrative has a fatal flaw: unalterable dates.
The official prescribing and dispensing logs prove mathematically that I was not on that medication during the periods they claimed. Because the physical evidence is undeniable, the General Medical Council (GMC) was forced to admit that mistakes were made yet the ICO complaint that highlighted accuracy issues and went directly at Article 5(1)(d) of the GDPR (and UK GDPR) & Was supported by evidence yet the ICO said “ sharing was justified “ they didnt even touch on accuracy instead skirted around it, didnt address it and ignored evidence yet, accuracy is fundamental requirement rooted in data protection princibles.
The GMC However, in an attempt to minimise the misconduct, then labeled this deliberate falsification of official records as "minor."
Both the GMC & ICO contradicting each other, both regulatory bodies, one minimized accuracy issues to minor, the other ignored accuracy issues and give a flawed justification of sharing was allowed.
______________________________________
4. Systemic Protection & Conflict of Interests & Influence from GP’s
Why is a clear pattern of dishonesty, selective truth, and the weaponisation of the police being brushed under the carpet?
Because the institutional scales are heavily weighted.
A senior executive sits at board level for both the local Integrated Care Board (ICB) and the GMC, advises police & courts and this executive shares close community and cultural ties with my GP (the PCN Director).
Both directors / senior individuals have are inherently interlinked due to data sharing & how that data was shared, Both had access to this personal & sensitive data, both contributed to this data being embedded in core NHS Medical file,
The CNTW Executive is also the Caldicott Guardian, if he makes a decision in my favour then that decision goes against the GP Practice & the senior GP / Director, its about liability and downstream effects, each protecting the other, each colluding making sure decisions go in there favour each using influence across the NHS and in other areas.
Instead of an impartial investigation, I have faced institutional capture.
The system has allowed a doctor to cover up clinical errors, avoided notifying their indemnity providers
(brown jacob solicitors acting as a panel solicitor for medical protection society had to tell his own client to report legal matters to NHS Resolution),
The other GP / Director avoided any reporting but however made statements to police minimizing wider issues
They’ve used alterior methods to discriminate against me, effectively leaving me locked out of the healthcare system while his primiary care practice refused all audit requests, nobody would want to enter health care under them conditions anyway, to then be subjected to police involvement when you’re excercising data rights & attempting to restore some normality is another example of certain individuals using influence & prestige & community standing to influence processes which directly effecting me negatively which had the ulimate effect of compounding previous issues..
its like systematically disadvantaging some one repeatedly.
The very same individual above ( GP / Director ) made police statements dated & signed claiming harassment, never mentioned a negligence claim he was named on once, he’s repeatedly failed to notify his indemity providers (likely because he wasnt insured for private GP work) made various other claims in statement,
He then further lies in police statements claiming all disclosures are correct his GP Partner does the same as both named on official paperwork (this isnt mentioned once in police statements) ,
The GMC Rule 12 team decision directly contradicts one GP’s statements to police, the GMC Rule 12 team deem his behaviour and continued pattern of acting dishonestly as minor & not against there rules & regulations,
The very same individual (GP) had special measure requests in at court to further shield himself from any scrutiny, the level of manipulation by some people is used intentionally and with purpose to avoid any accountability, they made a choice to do what they did, they made the decisions and decided to act the way they did, i suspect they’d hoped i would’nt of known or would’nt of challanged what they had done, Audit data requests are ignored for this exact reason.
I’ve followed every formal channel that you’re supposed to when serious events or issues come up in health care yet every investigating case officer for regulatory bodies in any of these matters;
99% of the time allways share the same cultural ties and come from the same community,
The ICB refused to help pushed me towards the PHSO, The ICO reduced one of the most important complaints & ignored materially objective evidence when i asked for a review , the GMC did the same, NHS Resolution also played some part early on, same type of avoidance,
The regulator bodies should be impartial and fair yet the very opposite is occurring and its blatent, and they repeatedly ignore objective material evidence & narrow issues
It Could’nt be any clearer for whats taking place,
its corruption and its spanning from primary care to a trust as both interwined due to data issues so those involved at senior level doing every thing they can to prevent me having any resolution, relationships extend in to legal circles, conflicts of interests are preventing fair decision making and processes are upended out of certain individuals being held in higher regard than others, this then results in compromised processes & decision making which then has a compounding effect and prevents any form of resolution.
Yet
I have no safe normal access to health care.
Data complaints & requests re-directed to the PHSO while senior staff catogorize these requests / complaints as ‘Standard’ and ‘service dissatisfaction’
Medical records altered, shared and also repeatedly & accessed.
Core NHS Medical Records left contaminated with raw comprehensive verbatim clinical notes that are 6years old and have no relevance to physical health conditions, they’ve had been repeatedly accessed and seen by nhs sdminstrative staff, some of these staff members live locally to myself
Treatment pathways for physical health conditons abandoned that took 5/6 years to get on waiting list for including corrective surgery
Then i’m criminalised for taking action while attempting to stop the using & sharing of private medical data
Humans rights systematically removed by individuals in health care who hold senior positions while regulators watch on, SAR’s & Audit data are ignored as regulators refuse to acknowledge and act due to the level of senior NHS individuals involved.
Every process i’ve encountered is unbalanced, every decision made biased!
CNTW Email Disclosure Concerns
As part of my data requests to CNTW, I specifically requested email correspondence concerning my personal data and expressly named certain senior members of management and staff whose communications I believed may be relevant especially in regards to sharing to primary care and wider issues, the named were provided in email and i requested they formed part of my audit request.
Subsequently disclosed audit documentation titled “Email Reproduction Checklist” (Call ID: 216014; DPA Number: 32427; Timeframe: “All”) appears to confirm that email searches were undertaken in response to the request.
The document records that email data existed within both Deleted Items and Sent Items folders, including four items located within a deleted-items repository and one item within sent items.
Significantly, the checklist states:
“N x3 – Unable to print (permission denied, attachments however were printed).”
This indicates that CNTW identified email material relevant to the request but did not reproduce three items due to unspecified permission restrictions, yet- despite attachments being accessible and printed.
Given that specific individuals were expressly named in the original request, this raises questions regarding the adequacy of disclosure, the scope of searches undertaken, the identity of the mailboxes searched, and the basis upon which access or reproduction of certain email data was denied.
In my view, the document evidences that relevant email data existed and that not all identified material was reproduced or disclosed in full,
Dated Emails confirm senior cntw staff signed off on audit data and they also confirmed internal emails had been retained, this delayed the audit request and a email was sent to me confirming this, up until today these emails have not been provided.
From the very start of raising issues with CNTW a defensive posture was taking in regards to complaints & data requests resulting in me having no controll over comprehensive RAW Verbatim psychiatric data, the DPO failed to resolve issues, The Caldicott Guardian ignored every email no resolution & no locking my file down, …
and after these requests further sharing and access occurred, up to this point and since 2/3 year ago the data has escaped clinical enviroment, been repeatedly shared and accessed by others while numerous staff & senior members prevented mysef exercising normal & legal GDPR data subject rights.
i was then effectivey criminalised for attempting to restore privacy and some form of control over my own special catergory medical data while simultanously being prevented safe unbiased access health care, once certain issues occur then certain safeguarding measures should apply to records to stop further unauthorised access, in my case it didnt and even when active ICO complaints & DPO requests were live, access still happend, sharing still occurred,
#Caldicott
#Transparency
# Hiding exact data/emails i requested
***Acess from morning until evening one of many***
The logs show intensive (9hrs), repetitive access to record with heavy read activity and some legitimate-looking documentation. The standout anomaly is the excessive, low-productivity viewing pattern, which strongly suggests unusual human behavior (possible unauthorized curiosity or improper monitoring).
Snap shot of CNTW audit data, one of many individuals with repeated access over 9hrs,others have 4hrs or 5hrs access with repeated client reads,
Alot of access occurred when i was’nt part of trust and left years before.
CNTW Caldicott /Executive Dr Radjesh Nadkarni & others are refusing my rights to privacy, refuse minization requests yet repeated access to medical data has occurred by certain individuals in CNTW even after i disengaged from trust, repeated sharing of data has occurred and repeated re-use of data has Occurred aswell as a ghost hepatitis diagnosis being incorporated on to NHS app alongside GP’s various medical record entries & disclosures to dvla
Audit data doesnt lie, amendment of records exist. refusals of nhs app audit exist.
#Nhs cover up and criminlistation of a data subject exercising legally allowed rights#
I am writing to seek urgent, independent, and completely unbiased legal advice. I am currently trying to manage a highly complex, multi-agency dispute involving a significant breakdown of safe healthcare access, systemic data breaches, and institutional victimization.
Because a senior healthcare executive involved in this matter holds highly influential dual roles—advising local courts, local solicitors, and the police, while simultaneously sitting on the Board of the Integrated Care Board (ICB) and multiple oversight boards—local avenues to justice have been compromised and most efforts usually procedurally blocked or batted side ways in the interests of senior individuals
***Interconnected GP and PCN Conflicts**** :
active negligence and data claim directly involves a GP Partner who is also a Director of the local Primary Care Network (PCN). Furthermore, a key director at the involved mental health trust (Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust - CNTW) shares close community and cultural ties with this GP Partner, creating a tightly-knit, protective network that undermines objective investigation and fair unbiased decision making.
***Weaponised Harassment Prosecution & Data Exploitation*** :
Arising directly from data disputes and civil action, I was prosecuted for harassment without causing fear or violence simply for sending emails regarding my case. This mechanism has been used by the institution to pathologize my communications and shut down legitimate data disputes, *** resulting in being convicted in magistrates courts with out a trial*** also warnings at my home address from police accompanied by local authority- never had acomplaint at my home address in 14 year up untill others started weileding influence in my direction, i escalated complaints they applied pressure and used police by proxy.
***Severe Medical Record Inaccuracy & Defamation*** :
A highly critical issue has emerged where my NHS App profile was updated to state that I had Hepatitis, originating directly from the GP practice.
This fabricated medical entry directly coincided with unauthorized disclosures made by the GPs to the DVLA. All data audit requests refused for this specific issues !
I explicitly state that I do not have Hepatitis never have and have’nt had a GP in three year, I am not an alcoholic, and I have absolutely no associated history of these conditions. This data has been weaponized against my character and my driving status, aswell as other data being repeatedly shared and accessed by multiple individuals with audit data showing access to cntw medical data for upto 3/4 hrs at a time by numerous nhs staff in CNTW, the audit doesnt lie.
***Unlawful Police Interference***:
The local executive’s multi-agency network has actively influenced regional law enforcement. A serving police office explicitly instructed me to cease making statutory NHS complaints, which constitutes a severe breach of my civil rights and direct institutional intimidation, repeated detainent attempts and one for sending legal requests to a senior north east cps prosecutor, numerous issues in case files regarding evidence / CCTV / adv1 / witness statements.
***Total Denial of Safe Healthcare Access***
: As a direct consequence of raising complaints and pursuing a claim, I have been left with no access to local GP services. Because I do not have a serious mental health condition, any attempts by this connected network to divert my physical health complaints into psychiatric pathways with CNTW are inaccurate and highly biased, behavioural type re-framing has allready repeatedly occurred aswell as diagnostic overshadowing and an abandoned ENT treatment pathway for known diagnosed physical health conditions supported by medical evidence,
i live in close proximity to the PCN so access to safe unbiased care is inpossible while a GP Partner is also a director of this PCN, i also hold corrospondane from NHS England confirming i’m not on any specialist register for dangerous patients
After the unfair trial / conviction a serving northumbria police attempted to direct me to specialist type GP Practice, this same northumbria police officer had attemptedan illegal detainment for sending emails to a senior CPS prosecutor while also asking me to cease NHS emails / Complaints / data requests
***Active Independent Investigations***
I have ongoing, open disputes with the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) regarding data mismanagement by both the NHS doctor’s surgery and the NHS trust, alongside active claims currently sitting with NHS Resolution and a appointed panel solicitors.
To support these serious claims, I hold a comprehensive, cross-agency audit trail consisting of the following evidence:
* CPS Files & Disclosures: Two distinct Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) case files, alongside the full CPS legal disclosure packs.
* Primary Care Audits: Full NHS GP medical files obtained via Subject Access Request (SAR), including the backend NHS electronic audit trail data.
* Secondary Care & Mental Health Audits: Complete CNTW trust SAR and audit data, which crucially contains incriminating internal management emails discussing my case. With ( DO NOT ADD TO RIO )instructions giving to senior staff mmembers while complaints Data requests & concerns described as a standard complaint & service dissatisfaction- this internal CNTW enail chain of senior nhs CNTW staff.
* National Oversight Records: A comprehensive, full NHS England SAR file.
* Regulatory & Oversight Tracking: Copies of formal communications and emails to and from the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC).
* The Data Breach Trail: A chronological, meticulously dated email chain tracing my data requests, subsequent trust refusals, escalations to the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO), and related police complaints.
****Data Protection and File Rectification****
: To legally enforce my data rights through the open ICO complaints, halt the ongoing manipulation of my medical records, and force the immediate removal of the false Hepatitis/alcoholism narrative from my central medical records and the DVLA.
* Neutralising Executive and Community Influence: To implement immediate legal and administrative mechanisms (such as formal recusals) to completely remove this senior executive, the GP/PCN Director, and their connected community influences from having any visibility or input on my legal files.
*** Securing Safe, Out-of-Area access to healthCare***:
To compel the ICB to provide an independent "Out-of-Area" GP registration completely walled off from the compromised local trust network, allowing me to safely access medical care without fear or harassment and further issues with medical data occurring.
Given the extreme power imbalance and the multi-agency nature of this victimization, I require robust, external legal expertise to ensure my human rights, data security, and access to justice are preserved instead of eroded systematically by senior nhs employees
# Dr Rajesh Nadkarni / court advisor / Exeutive /solicitor advisor / CNTW Executive & Caldicott, repeatedly ignored all data requests, had full over sight of wider issues due to emails i sent directly to cntw caldicott email address aswell as me raising concerns around governance issues.
(Its decided all data shared was for treatment purposes - Full raw verbatim transcripts of cntw data, shared to DVLA, police and repeatedly acessed by adminstrative staff in both primary care & also CNTW) even when data requests & objections were live with ICO & NHS DPO’s the sharing & access repeated & Continued.
# Dr muhammad *****. Director / GP Partner
(All audit requests refused, witness statements played down issues, submitted special measures requests to magistrates as did his gp partner feigning fear / harassment and alarm and that i intended to harass GP practioners in a magistrates court room)
The special measures application, CPS disclosures and witness statements all form part of comprehensive evidence bundle.
This is the unlawfull detainment attempt which was influenced by an NHS GP, the below is a standard request & both the police & the sergeant on duty should know the law in regards to pace regulations, they was attempting to harass myself as i raised issues in regards to the NHS.
I’ll be adding various uploads over time on my own reddit page which evidences police harassment influenced by two NHS GP’s, one also being a director, i’ve retained copy’s of every sent & received email aswell as all SAR’s & CPS SAR’s, NHS SAR’s.
(1)
Date: 5 January 2026 at 00:39:35
REDACTED]
(URN: [REDACTED])
Dear Sir/Madam,
I write in relation to the above matter, R v [REDACTED] (URN: [REDACTED]), concerning the harassment trial listed for March at *************** Magistrates’ Court.
I am writing to formally request that the following prosecution witnesses be required to attend court to give oral evidence:
Both individuals have provided witness statements within the prosecution case file and are central witnesses whose evidence I intend to test at trial inline with associated NHS documentation. Their statements cannot be agreed / in dispute and their attendance is therefore required.
The witnesses evidence raises matters of factual dispute and credibility which can only be properly addressed through oral evidence and cross-examination.
For completeness, I have attached the CPS disclosure bundle for ease of reference.
I have also CC’d the general Contact Crime email address, as I was not entirely certain which court email inbox is appropriate for this request, and wished to ensure it is received by the correct team in the magistrates court.
Please confirm that the necessary steps will be taken to secure the attendance of these witnesses, or advise if any further information is required from me at this stage.
Yours faithfully,
[REDACTED]
Defendant
URN: [REDACTED]