Questions about Christopher Wallis
I was checking out the "getting started" section of this subreddit, which recommends a lot of the work of Bettin Bäumer, Mark Dyczkowski, Sthaneshwar Timalsina, Thakur Jaideva Singh, Lakshmanjoo, etc., but I noticed under the section on "Pratyabhijñāhṛdayam of Kṣemarāja," Wallis's The Recognition Sutras was left out. In fact, while writing this question, a message popped up stating, "A defining feature of this sub is its strong focus on authenticity, which ensures accurate teachings and combats appropriation of the tradition. Your post references an organization or figure flagged as not being an authentic representative of the living tradition and lineages of Kashmir Śaivism." So could someone share here what exactly is wrong with his work? I can understand how he lacks transmission, but that doesn't necessarily invalidate his work as a translator. Would someone share what is wrong with his translations, etc? Because an article Wallis wrote summarizing Sanderson's own assessment of the history of Kashmir Shaivism compared to other tantric traditions, including Buddhist tantra, is cited with approval.
I am not trying to start an argument, nor am I a follower or student of Christopher Wallis. I just want to genuinely understand not just which authorities are trusted on this sub, but why some are, and others aren't. I appreciate any feedback!