r/AdvaitaVedanta

What do you do with life when the need to constantly seek or achieve begins to fade?

Something I have been reflecting lately and would love to hear different perspectives from amazing people here.

Through Atma Vichara (self-inquiry) and constant self remembrance, I’ve gradually found a sense of inner stillness and contentment. Life has become simple and I’m at more peace than ever. Simple ordinary experiences feel richer when you’re simply present and there is less psychological need to chase achievements.

And with LLMs doing most of my intellectual work (principal engineer), I’m left with more time than ever. Overall I enjoy my work, spending time with my spouse, playing table tennis, reading, and occasionally watching TV and have developed a simple routine in life which maybe be monotonous but there is just subtle ease in it. But I don’t have any particular creative passion or hobby that calls for hours of engagement.Also being an immigrant in a foreign country(I’m in Toronto if anyone wants to catch up :)) there is lot more solitude and more time to yourself…

I also don’t want to turn Advaita/Non dualism itself into another pursuit, endlessly consuming spiritual teachings or chasing deeper experiences. Self-inquiry and life experiences have already brought meaningful clarity, and I’d rather let that understanding mature naturally

So I’m curious:
When the need to become something begins to dissolve, what does one do with the sheer abundance of time that remains ? What do you do everyday generally?

Thanks

reddit.com
u/justrandomebloke — 4 days ago

Saint Meister Eckart's non-dual preachings strikingly sound exactly like verses from Advaitic texts.

"The soul must be stripped of all her forms and clothed in her formless form, which is God Himself. When the soul loses her own name and her own form, she is absorbed into the infinite abyss of the divine nature."

— Meister Eckhart, Sermon 52

Eckhart is even using the same terminology/language as the Vedantic texts. The emphasis on "name" and "form" is exactly what even Vedantic texts describe, the "nama" and "rupa" as the qualities to be negated/stripped to know the truth.

My fav christian non-dualist after Christ himself.

reddit.com
u/shksa339 — 3 days ago

The Vedantic Interpretation of Devi Mahatmyam: The Glory of the Divine Mother

श्री मात्रे नमः।।

Wishing you all a very happy, joyous, prosperous and awakening Navratri!

Reading the Durga Saptashati as a journey from ignorance to the recognition of the Supreme Reality.

The Devi Mahatmyam, also known as the Durga Saptashati or Chandi Patha, is one of the most revered scriptures of the Shakta tradition. It forms part of the Markandeya Purana, comprising thirteen chapters that narrate the glory of the Divine Mother through three principal episodes: the destruction of Madhu and Kaitabha, the slaying of Mahishasura, and the final battle against Shumbha and Nishumbha.

These three episodes are associated with Mahakali, Mahalakshmi and Mahasaraswati, respectively.

In general reading, these are accounts of the Supreme Goddess protecting the universe and restoring cosmic order. But the text also raises profound philosophical questions. What is the power through which the universe is manifested? Why does ignorance persist even in those who possess knowledge? How does the same Divine Power bind beings to worldly existence and also become the means of their liberation?

When approached through Advaita Vedanta, alongside the Shakta understanding of Devi as the Supreme Reality, the three stories can be contemplated as a spiritual journey: the unveiling of ignorance, the overcoming of ego and disorder, and the recognition that the many powers of the universe have their source in one Divine Reality.

The symbolic interpretations that follow are contemplative readings, not a claim that every demon in the text represents a specific psychological defect according to an explicit scriptural commentary.

1. The Opening of Devi Mahatmyam: Why Do We Remain Bound?

The story begins with King Suratha, who has lost his kingdom, and the merchant Samadhi, who has been rejected by his own family. Both have suffered greatly, yet their minds continue to cling to the very people and possessions associated with their suffering.

They approach the sage Medhas, seeking an explanation for their attachment.

The king wonders why his mind remains attached to his former kingdom and subjects despite knowing that he has lost his authority. The merchant similarly cannot stop worrying about the family members who have abandoned him.

The sage explains that this bewildering attachment arises through the power of Mahamaya.

ज्ञानिनामपि चेतांसि देवी भगवती हि सा ।

बलादाकृष्य मोहाय महामाया प्रयच्छति ॥

(That Goddess, the Divine Mahamaya, forcibly draws even the minds of the wise into delusion.)

The sage then describes the extraordinary nature of this power.

सैषा प्रसन्ना वरदा नृणां भवति मुक्तये ।

सा विद्या परमा मुक्तेर्हेतुभूता सनातनी ॥

संसारबन्धहेतुश्च सैव सर्वेश्वरेश्वरी ॥

(When pleased, she becomes the giver of boons and the means of liberation for human beings. She is the Supreme Knowledge, eternal and the cause of liberation. She herself is also the cause of bondage in worldly existence, O Sovereign Goddess.)

These verses introduce one of the central philosophical themes of the entire scripture: the same Divine Power through which beings experience delusion can also become the means of their liberation.

A Vedantic Reflection

Advaita Vedanta teaches that our essential nature is Brahman, the non-dual Reality, but that we ordinarily identify ourselves with the body, mind, senses and individual personality. Through avidya, or ignorance, we fail to recognise our true nature and take the limited individual self to be the entirety of who we are.

The Devi Mahatmyam approaches the mystery through the language of Mahamaya. The power that sustains worldly experience can conceal the truth from us, even when we possess considerable intellectual knowledge.

This distinction is important. Knowing that attachment causes suffering is not the same as becoming free from attachment. One may understand impermanence intellectually and still grieve over possessions, relationships, status or reputation.

The king and the merchant illustrate this predicament beautifully.

From an Advaitic perspective, we may contemplate their suffering as a consequence of identification and attachment. From a Shakta perspective, we may go further and recognise Mahamaya not merely as an obstacle to overcome, but as the Divine Mother whose grace can transform our relationship with the world.

The scripture does not ask us simply to despise the world. It asks us to understand the mysterious power through which our minds become entangled in it, and to seek the knowledge that liberates us.

With this question established, the first great manifestation of Devi appears.

2. Prathama Charitra (The First Episode) - Mahakali: The Power That Awakens Consciousness

The Story of Madhu and Kaitabha

At the beginning of a cosmic cycle, Lord Vishnu lies upon the serpent Ananta in the waters of cosmic dissolution (Ekarnava samudra). While the Lord rests in yogic sleep, the lotus from his navel bears Brahma, who is engaged in the work of creation.

Two formidable asuras, Madhu and Kaitabha, emerge from the Lord's ear wax and threaten Brahma.

Unable to carry out his work safely, Brahma invokes the Goddess who envelops Lord Vishnu in yogic sleep. He praises her and requests that she withdraw her power of sleep so that the Lord may awaken and destroy the two demons.

The Goddess withdraws from Lord Vishnu, who awakens and eventually defeats Madhu and Kaitabha.

The first episode is therefore not merely a story of two demons being slain. It depicts the cosmic power through which even the activity of the devas is enabled.

The Goddess is not presented as an insignificant force subordinate to the workings of the universe. She is the power whose presence makes those workings possible.

The Philosophical Significance of Mahamaya

The opening chapter contains a particularly striking idea: Lord Vishnu himself is enveloped in Yogic Sleep through the power of the Goddess. Even Brahma, the creator, depends upon her intervention.

In an Advaitic contemplation, this can lead us to reflect upon the difference between pure consciousness and the changing states experienced by the mind. Sleep, waking and dreaming are familiar experiences, but the ultimate nature of consciousness cannot be reduced to any one of these states.

We should, however, be careful not to equate Lord Vishnu's Yogic Sleep in the narrative directly with avidya or ordinary unconsciousness.

The Shakta understanding offers another important perspective. The Divine Mother is Mahamaya, the power through which the unmanifest becomes manifest and through which the universe is sustained. Her power is not external to the Supreme Reality.

For an Advaitin, Maya helps explain the appearance of multiplicity without requiring Brahman itself to undergo a fundamental transformation. For a Shakta, the Divine Power may be worshipped as the living, sovereign reality through which the universe arises, exists and dissolves.

These approaches have significant points of contact, although they should not be treated as identical in every respect.

Mahakali As A Contemplative Symbol

If we approach the story inwardly, Madhu and Kaitabha may be contemplated as the forces that obstruct clarity and spiritual awakening. Their destruction can represent the overcoming of those obstacles through divine grace and knowledge.

Mahakali reminds the seeker that liberation cannot be reduced to intellectual effort alone. The ego may attempt to conquer ignorance using the very habits of thought that sustain its mistaken identification. Genuine transformation requires discernment, discipline, devotion and, in the language of the scripture, the grace of the Divine Mother.

The first episode thus prepares the seeker for the next stage: the restoration of order when the forces of disorder have taken control.

3. Madhyama Charitra (The Middle Episode) - Mahalakshmi: The Restoration of Cosmic Order

The Story of Mahishasura

The second great episode begins with the defeat of the devas by Mahishasura, the powerful asura who assumes the form of a buffalo.

Having conquered the devas, Mahishasura takes control of their celestial positions and deprives them of their rightful authority. The devas approach Brahma, Lord Vishnu and Lord Shiva, seeking help.

In response to the oppression, a tremendous radiance emerges from the gods. Their combined energies give rise to the magnificent form of the Goddess, Mahishasura Mardini (contemplated as Mahalakshmi in Devi Mahatmyam), who is equipped with divine weapons.

She confronts Mahishasura and his armies in a prolonged and terrible battle. The asura repeatedly changes form, displaying his extraordinary power, but the Goddess ultimately destroys him and restores the gods to their positions.

The middle episode celebrates Devi as the power capable of overcoming a force that no individual god could defeat alone.

A Vedantic Reflection On Mahishasura

Mahishasura can be contemplated as a symbol of the ego when it becomes dominant, unrestrained and resistant to wisdom.

The ego is not simply the ordinary sense of personal identity required to function in the world. In Vedantic discussions, the problem is the mistaken identification of the Self with the body-mind complex, together with the resulting sense of separateness, possessiveness and independent doership.

When this identification becomes excessive, it begins to govern our inner world. Desire, anger, pride and possessiveness occupy the place that should belong to discernment.

In this symbolic reading, Mahishasura's seizure of the heavens resembles the disorder that arises when the lower tendencies of the mind usurp the authority of wisdom.

The gods, understood contemplatively as the faculties and powers that sustain harmony, lose their proper place. The emergence of Mahalakshmi represents the restoration of that harmony through a higher power.

Why Does Devi Emerge From The Radiance of Devas?

This detail deserves special attention.

The devas contribute their radiance, yet the resulting Goddess is not merely an ordinary sum of separate powers. She manifests as an integrated and sovereign presence who surpasses the asura's strength.

A Shakta reading sees here a profound affirmation of the Goddess as the source and unifying power of divine energies.

From an Advaitic standpoint, the episode can also inspire reflection on the apparent diversity of powers and faculties. The universe presents itself as a multiplicity, yet its manifestations need not be understood as ultimately independent realities.

The many derive their significance from a deeper unity.

This does not mean that the narrative is simply an allegory in which every god represents a mental faculty. Rather, the story gives us a way to contemplate how differentiated powers can find their source in a supreme principle.

The Victory of Mahalakshmi

The victory over Mahishasura is not merely the triumph of one combatant over another. It is the restoration of rightful order after arrogance and domination have disrupted it.

For the spiritual seeker, this can signify the need to restore discernment to its proper place. Spiritual life is not only about acquiring knowledge; it is also about allowing that knowledge to transform one's conduct, desires and relationship with the world.

The first episode drew our attention to the mysterious power of ignorance. The second turns our attention to the disorder that arises when the ego dominates the inner kingdom.

But even when gross obstacles have been overcome, subtle forms of duality and self-importance can remain. The final episode addresses a deeper mystery.

4. Uttara Charitra (The Final Episode) - Mahasaraswati: The Recognition Of The One Behind The Many

The Story of Shumbha and Nishumbha

In the final major episode, the asuras Shumbha and Nishumbha become powerful enough to challenge the gods and take possession of their domains.

The Goddess manifests in a radiant form, and the asuras, captivated by her beauty and power, attempt to possess her. Their pride prevents them from recognising that the Goddess is not an object that can be acquired or controlled.

The conflict escalates. Chanda and Munda, Raktabija and other formidable asuras are defeated. Finally, Devi confronts Shumbha and Nishumbha themselves.

During this battle, the various forms and powers of the Goddess play decisive roles. The narrative reaches its philosophical climax when Shumbha challenges Devi, arguing that she relies on the strength of other goddesses in battle.

Her response is one of the most significant passages in the entire text.

एकैवाहं जगत्यत्र द्वितीया का ममापरा ।

पश्यैता दुष्ट मय्येव विशन्त्यो मद्विभूतयः ॥

(I alone exist here in this universe. What other is there besides me? Behold, O wicked one, these manifestations of mine are entering back into me.)

The various manifestations of Devi withdraw into her, and she stands alone before Shumbha. After a fierce battle, she defeats him.

This moment brings the three episodes together in a striking manner.

The many powers that appeared separately are revealed as manifestations of one supreme Goddess.

The Advaitic Resonance Of This Declaration

The verse naturally invites comparison with the central insight of Advaita Vedanta: the ultimate Reality is non-dual.

The Chandogya Upanishad declares:

सदेव सोम्येदमग्र आसीदेकमेवाद्वितीयम् ।

(Dear one, in the beginning, this was Existence alone, one without a second.)

The Upanishadic declaration and Devi's statement in the Devi Mahatmyam arise in different textual and theological contexts. Nevertheless, both can lead the contemplative reader toward the question of how multiplicity relates to ultimate unity.

In Advaita Vedanta, Brahman is not one individual being standing beside other independent beings. Brahman is the non-dual Reality in light of which the apparent division between subject and object is ultimately understood.

The Devi Mahatmyam expresses its own powerful vision: the many divine manifestations are grounded in the one Goddess, who is not exhausted by their apparent separateness.

A Shakta may understand this more directly as the declaration of Devi's supreme sovereignty and her identity with the totality of existence.

An Advaitin may contemplate it as a revelation of non-duality through the language of the Divine Mother.

Shumbha And Nishumbha As Symbols of Subtle Ego

At a contemplative level, Shumbha and Nishumbha may represent the subtler forms of appropriation that persist even after gross desires have been restrained.

One may become proud of one's learning, spiritual practice, discipline or religious accomplishments. The mind can turn even spiritual progress into a new possession: "I have understood," "I have conquered my weaknesses," or "I am spiritually superior."

In this reading, Shumbha's desire to possess Devi is especially suggestive. The Supreme cannot be reduced to an object owned by the individual ego.

The spiritual path does not culminate in the ego acquiring God as another possession. It culminates in the transcendence of the mistaken separation between the individual and the ultimate Reality.

The final victory thus points beyond the mere defeat of external enemies. It invites the seeker to contemplate the One from whom all powers arise and into whom all manifestations return.

5. Is Devi Merely Maya, Or Is She The Brahman Herself?

In some simplified explanations, Maya is described as the power that makes the world of multiplicity appear, while Brahman is the ultimate Reality beyond it. This can lead to an oversimplification in which Maya is treated as something inferior or irrelevant to spiritual life.

The Devi Mahatmyam does not allow us to dismiss the Goddess so easily.

The same Devi is described as Mahamaya, who can delude even the wise, and as the Supreme Knowledge (Mahavidya) that brings liberation. She is the power through which the world is sustained, and she is also the one to whom the gods bow in praise.

The final chapters deepen this vision.

सृष्टिस्थितिविनाशानां शक्तिभूते सनातनि ।

गुणाश्रये गुणमये नारायणि नमोऽस्तु ते ॥

[O Eternal One, who is the power behind creation, preservation and dissolution; who is the substratum of the gunas and who is constituted of the gunas, O Narayani (The One who gives refuge to the mortals), salutations to you.]

This verse presents Devi as the power behind the entire cosmic process.

The apparent paradox is that she is both associated with the gunas and described as their substratum. She is intimately connected with the manifested universe, yet the language of the hymn points to a reality that cannot be reduced to any one manifestation.

In an Advaitic interpretation, one may distinguish between Brahman considered in its ultimate, non-dual nature and Ishvara understood in relation to Maya and the manifested universe. The Devi Mahatmyam, however, speaks devotionally of the Goddess herself as the supreme source and power of the cosmos.

For the Advaitin, the inquiry leads toward the recognition of non-dual Brahman. For the Shakta, the same inquiry can deepen into the realisation that the Divine Mother is the supreme reality, present throughout the universe and transcending every finite form.

She is the one invoked for protection, wisdom, prosperity and liberation.

6. The Three Mahavidyas Of The Cosmic Drama? A Clarification About Mahakali, Mahalakshmi And Mahasaraswati

The three principal episodes are associated with Mahakali, Mahalakshmi and Mahasaraswati. These names are sometimes interpreted through the three gunas: tamas, rajas and sattva.

Such associations can provide a useful philosophical framework, but they require care.

The gunas are the three fundamental qualities described in Samkhya and incorporated into several Hindu philosophical traditions:

  1. Tamas is associated with inertia, obscuration and heaviness.

  2. Rajas is associated with activity, passion and movement.

  3. Sattva is associated with clarity, harmony and illumination.

Some traditional and modern interpretations associate Mahakali with tamas, Mahalakshmi with rajas, and Mahasaraswati with sattva. This framework can be used to contemplate the cosmic functions and symbolism of the three forms.

However, the relationship should not be reduced to a simplistic formula in which Mahakali is "ignorance," Mahalakshmi is "desire," and Mahasaraswati is "knowledge." Nor should these three forms be confused with the ordinary psychological qualities of individual people.

The Devi Mahatmyam presents all three as divine manifestations, and its concluding theology does not leave them as three independent or competing ultimate realities. The Goddess is the one source of the many.

The threefold framework is therefore best understood as a contemplative aid, not a complete definition of the Divine Mother.

7. The Culmination: All This Is Devi

A particularly memorable verse appears in the stotram related to this text.

सर्वरूपमयी देवी सर्वं देवीमयं जगत् ।

अतोऽहं विश्वरूपां तां नमामि परमेश्वरीम् ।।

(The Goddess embodies all forms, and the entire universe is filled with the Goddess. Therefore, I bow to you, O Supreme Goddess, whose form is the whole universe.)

This verse is a fitting culmination of the journey through the three charitras.

Mahakali reveals the mysterious power behind cosmic sleep, delusion and awakening. Mahalakshmi manifests the power that defeats Mahishasura and restores order. Mahasaraswati brings the narrative to its climax, where the many manifestations of Devi return to the One.

Seen through a Vedantic lens, these stories can become more than accounts of ancient battles. They invite us to examine our own ignorance, the dominance of the ego and the subtle conviction that reality is divided into independently existing selves and objects.

Seen through the Shakta tradition, they reveal the glory of the Divine Mother, who is simultaneously the source of the universe, its sustaining power and the refuge of those who seek liberation.

The Devi Mahatmyam answers through the language of devotion, divine manifestation and victory. It calls us to bow before the Goddess, to seek her grace and to contemplate the mystery of the One appearing as the many.

Perhaps the deepest lesson is that spiritual knowledge is not merely the accumulation of ideas about the Divine. It is a transformation of how we see ourselves, the world and the source of all existence.

The Divine Mother who appears in three great narratives is finally praised as the one who pervades all forms.

And so the seeker, having witnessed the victories of Mahakali, Mahalakshmi and Mahasaraswati, returns to the central truth proclaimed throughout the scripture: the power that binds is also the power that liberates.

Apologies for any mistakes.

जय माता दी।

u/awiksshiith_narang — 4 days ago

Ramakrishna, enlightenment and mental illness

Sri Ramakrisha is one of my spiritual heroes. But I can’t help but wonder, if he was around today - and especially if he lived in the Western world - how would society receive him? I am bipolar and have suffered manic episodes in my life and I can certainly see parallels between some of his actions and the kinds of actions and thoughts I have when unwell. (Don’t think that I’m comparing myself to him - I would never.)

I just wonder about some of his more extreme behaviours, his constantly hearing God’s voice in his head, his fits, his falling into spells of depression, and I can’t help but think that he would be misunderstood today. Perhaps he would have been diagnosed as mentally ill. It’s a shame, because he was absolutely ahead of his time and clearly a brilliant soul.

I do often wonder about the blurred line between spiritual awakening and mental instability… What are your thoughts on this?

reddit.com
u/Pleasant-Yak2037 — 11 days ago

What is an advaitic convert called?

What is an advaitic convert called? There is no conversion in Hinduism.

You can’t be called an Advaitic adherent. You can’t not adhere to the nature of the universe.

I can call myself a Hindjew. :)

What is good shorthand for someone newly established into Vedanta?

reddit.com
u/Advaitica_org — 11 days ago

Question about the literal experience of being the witness in Advaita

In Advaita Vedanta, we are encouraged to discriminate between the knower (awareness) and the known (the body, mind, thoughts, emotions, sensations, etc.), and through practice become less identified with the body-mind complex.
I’m curious about what this actually means experientially, especially for someone who is deeply realized.

Does earnest practice create an increasingly obvious experiential “gap” between awareness and the body-mind?

For example, if a realized person is at work, talking to someone, or performing a physical task, do they literally experience their body and mind as something separate from themselves — almost as though they are watching the body and mind functioning from a distance?

Or is the experience actually much more ordinary, with the body, thoughts, emotions and actions still being fully experienced, but without the sense “I am this body-mind”?

In other words, what does being the witness actually feel like in direct experience?
And does this sense of witnessing eventually disappear as well, because the distinction between “the witness” and “what is witnessed” is itself seen as dualistic?

reddit.com
u/Only_Volume2466 — 12 days ago

My question is for those who do not believe in personal rebirth.

How do you interpret these verses mentioned below ?

Why would a teaching exist about not returning back, if a separate individual does not personally continue after death?

Bhagavad Gita: Chapter 4, Verse 9

जन्म कर्म च मे दिव्यमेवं यो वेत्ति तत्त्वत: |

त्यक्त्वा देहं पुनर्जन्म नैति मामेति सोऽर्जुन || 9||

janma karma cha me divyam evaṁ yo vetti tattvataḥ

tyaktvā dehaṁ punar janma naiti mām eti so ’rjuna

janma—birth; karma—activities; cha—and; me—of mine; divyam—divine; evam—thus; yaḥ—who; vetti—know; tattvataḥ—in truth; tyaktvā—having abandoned; deham—the body; punaḥ—again; janma—birth; na—never; eti—takes; mām—to me; eti—comes; saḥ—he; arjuna—Arjun

Translation:

Those who understand the divine nature of My birth and activities, O Arjun, upon leaving the body, do not have to take birth again, but come to My eternal abode.

--------

Arjun said: What is the fate of the unsuccessful yogi who begins the path with faith, but who does not endeavor sufficiently, due to unsteady mind, and is unable to reach the goal of Yog in this life? (6.37)

Does not such a person who deviates from Yog get deprived of both material and spiritual success, O mighty-armed Krishna, and perish like a broken cloud with no position in either sphere? (6.38)

You should completely dispel, O Krishna, this doubt of mine; for no one but You can destroy such a doubt. (6.39)

The Lord said: O Pārtha, there is no destruction for him either in this world or the next: no evil, My son, befalls a man who does good. (6.40)

The man who has fallen away from yoga goes to the worlds of the righteous. Having lived there for unnumbered years, he is reborn in the home of the pure and the prosperous. (6.41)

Or he is born into a family of yogis rich in wisdom. Verily, such a birth is hard to gain in this world. (6.42)

There he comes in touch with the knowledge acquired in his former body, O son of the Kurus, and strives still further for perfection. (6.43)

Indeed, they feel drawn toward God, even against their will, on the strength of their past discipline. Such seekers naturally rise above the ritualistic principles of the scriptures. (6.44)

Practising assiduously, the yogi having acquired perfection through many births attains the supreme state (Moksha) purified of all sins. (6.45)

--------

Bhagavad Gita: Chapter 8, Verse 21

अव्यक्तोऽक्षर इत्युक्तस्तमाहु: परमां गतिम् |

यं प्राप्य न निवर्तन्ते तद्धाम परमं मम || 21||

avyakto ’kṣhara ityuktas tam āhuḥ paramāṁ gatim

yaṁ prāpya na nivartante tad dhāma paramaṁ mama

avyaktaḥ—unmanifest; akṣharaḥ—imperishable; iti—thus; uktaḥ—is said; tam—that; āhuḥ—is called; paramām—the supreme; gatim—destination; yam—which; prāpya—having reached; na—never; nivartante—come back; tat—that; dhāma—abode; paramam—the supreme; mama—My

Translation:

This Unmanifested is called the Imperishable; It is said to be the Ultimate Goal, from which those who reach It never come back. That is My Supreme Abode.

---------

Bhagavad Gita: Chapter 12, Verse 6-7

ये तु सर्वाणि कर्माणि मयि संन्न्यस्य मत्पर: |

अनन्येनैव योगेन मां ध्यायन्त उपासते || 6||

तेषामहं समुद्धर्ता मृत्युसंसारसागरात् |

भवामि नचिरात्पार्थ मय्यावेशितचेतसाम् || 7||

ye tu sarvāṇi karmāṇi mayi sannyasya mat-paraḥ

ananyenaiva yogena māṁ dhyāyanta upāsate

teṣhām ahaṁ samuddhartā mṛityu-saṁsāra-sāgarāt

bhavāmi na chirāt pārtha mayy āveśhita-chetasām

ye—who; tu—but; sarvāṇi—all; karmāṇi—actions; mayi—to Me; sannyasya—dedicating; mat-paraḥ—regarding Me as the Supreme goal; ananyena—exclusively; eva—certainly; yogena—with devotion; mām—Me; dhyāyantaḥ—meditating; upāsate—worship; teṣhām—of those; aham—I; samuddhartā—the deliverer; mṛityu-saṁsāra-sāgarāt—from the ocean of birth and death; bhavāmi—(I) become; na—not; chirāt—after a long time; pārtha—Arjun, the son of Pritha; mayi—with Me; āveśhita chetasām—of those whose consciousness is united

Translation:

O Arjuna! Those verily who renounce all actions in Me, think of Me as the only refuge and worship Me with single-minded devotion and Dhyana, to them I become the saviour and quickly lift them up from the ocean of death and ‘samsara’.

reddit.com
u/Vishyoga — 12 days ago

Is this the reality of God and maha-gurus/saints?

Hello, I'm a newbie sadhak who has recently learnt how to control thought-streams in the mind & meditate properly on a mantra or absolute nothingness. I do Bhairav naam japa followed by a few minutes of deep meditation. This practice has taught me to surrender myself and open my brain as an outflowing stream of thoughts without owning/judging.

But while surrendering my mind to nothingness, many times I come across ideas/thoughts that I doubt aren't mine. It feels like knowledge flowing in, in the form of ideas that are a bit too intellectual compared to my intellect. Is this normal, or are these my own ideas/thoughts?

I recently saw a short film on YouTube, it's the most unique piece of content I have ever watched in my life. You can watch it here (not promoting): [https://youtu.be/IjL3NWwRqqc?si=zjqM2iisxvHbs54O\](https://youtu.be/IjL3NWwRqqc?si=zjqM2iisxvHbs54O)

The next day after watching this film, after dinner, when I was doing my usual chores, I came across some ideas that I need to share and get some expert insights on,

The short film states:

\- Intense fear & misery leads the path to God

\- They depict God as a neurological setback in the human brain.

Their main idea is that when an individual feels their life is threatened in the worst possible way, they see God. The prophets and spiritual organizations (churches in the film) keep reminding people of their problems, which drives them closer to God.

I have read and heard many instances where people faint out of fear or get a fever for days after encountering a devta darshan. Isn't it somewhat similar to what this film is trying to say? Is the fear installed in us humans by the deity so that we can tap into their wavelength and see them?

Now my thought (I'm not sure how correct this is, it just popped into my mind):

There are two types of gurus:

  1. who offers themselves as the medium to reach God (like Mahaavtar Babaji, Sai Baba, etc.) and hence when people worship them they are actually worshipping the highest power itself. (I have also read about the time when Shri Ramakrishna Paramahansa was photographed while in a trance, and then he himself used to offer flowers to his own image as an offering to the higher energy he was connected to during the trance)

  2. The gurus who try to misuse this path of misery (as in short-film), leading people towards God, but they try to use misery for self-gain. Now I have had some personal experiences where a person with psychic powers has misled me and put me into miseries that maybe I wasn't supposed to undergo. He used to discourage worshiping gurus like Sai Baba and used to attempt to influence people with their psychic powers. This person also did some kind of tricks on my family and influenced me to stop Bhairav naam japa. I have started it again to seek Bhairav baba's blessings and protection from negative energies.

Are the above thoughts valid in real spirituality, or am I just thinking a bit too much unknowingly?

u/Upbeat_Whereas374 — 12 days ago

Is God energy in Hinduism and Advaita Vedanta?

Is God considered energy in Hinduism like it is considered in New Age that uses many Hindu concepts like Yoga, meditation, etc...? How does Advaita Vedanta differ than New Age?

reddit.com
u/Vlasina003 — 11 days ago