
How is my Gita Homepage? Need Feedback
If you haven’t visited wisdomquotes.in please visit and give me feedback on the app. I need your honest thoughts to make this the best place to read our shaastra

If you haven’t visited wisdomquotes.in please visit and give me feedback on the app. I need your honest thoughts to make this the best place to read our shaastra
Most English translations of the Gita just swap ātman out for "soul" and move on. I get why. There's no clean equivalent in English. But the two words carry completely different assumptions about what you actually are.
Soul in the biblical tradition is something God created, individually, and it has one life to get things right. The verdict is permanent. Heaven or hell, forever. And what tips the scale is belief.
Ātman isn't any of that. It wasn't created. It isn't individual in the way a soul is. The Gita says it isn't even the doer of actions, which is kind of the whole point of Chapter 3. And the afterlife framework is completely different. Svarga is real, but it's temporary. BG 9.21 literally says when the merit runs out, you come back. There's no permanent destination until moksha, which isn't a place anyway.
The mistranslation also quietly smuggles in the assumption that your fate is decided by what you believe. In the Gita it's decided by the accumulated weight of what you've done across lifetimes. That's not a small difference.
Wrote something longer on this comparing the actual verses. Genesis vs BG 2.20, Matthew against Katha Upanishad, the whole heaven/hell eternal vs svarga/narka temporary thing.
Detailed blog: https://www.wisdomquotes.in/blogs/atman-not-soul-bhagavad-gita
Most English translations of the Bhagavad Gita render ahaṅkāra as "ego," but that mapping loses something important.
Ahaṅkāra literally means "I-maker" — aham (I) + kāra (maker). It's not a personality flaw or arrogance. It's the mechanism by which the infinite self mistakes itself for a limited, named, positioned person.
The Gita's use is precise. In 3.27, Krishna says prakriti (nature) performs all actions, but ahaṅkāra claims authorship — "I did this." In 18.58–59, he tells Arjuna: surrender that claim, and action becomes effortless. Cling to it, and you'll refuse to fight even when you should.
The distinction from ātman matters too. Ātman is the witnessing self — unchanging, unchosen. Ahaṅkāra is the story layered on top: the name, the role, the narrative of "me." The Gita's path isn't self-destruction but seeing through the confusion between the two.
Worth sitting with: when Krishna criticizes ahaṅkāra in chapter 16 (alongside greed and anger), he's not asking Arjuna to have low self-esteem. He's pointing at something more structural — the habit of taking credit for what consciousness merely moves through.
Full blog: https://www.wisdomquotes.in/blogs/ahankara-meaning-bhagavad-gita
Between Jan–March 2023, at least five GitaGPTs launched in India. The first was a weekend project by a 23-year-old Google Bengaluru engineer. Four clones followed in 4 weeks.
All of them were GPT-3 with a one-paragraph "you are Krishna" system prompt. No retrieval, no verse lookup, no citations, no safety filters.
Rest of World and CBC tested them:
The creator's defense: "I just build the knives. If people use it to murder or cut vegetables, that's not in my hands."
Meanwhile Magisterium AI — a Catholic chatbot launched the same year — is now the most-used theological AI in the world. It retrieves from 30,000+ Church docs and cites every source. The Gita has 700 verses and the commentaries are public domain. Any of the five could've built this. None did.
Full teardown: https://wisdomquotes.in/blogs/rise-and-failure-of-gitagpt
Between Jan–March 2023, at least five GitaGPTs launched in India. The first was a weekend project by a 23-year-old Google Bengaluru engineer. Four clones followed in 4 weeks.
All of them were GPT-3 with a one-paragraph "you are Krishna" system prompt. No retrieval, no verse lookup, no citations, no safety filters.
Rest of World and CBC tested them:
The creator's defense: "I just build the knives. If people use it to murder or cut vegetables, that's not in my hands."
Meanwhile Magisterium AI — a Catholic chatbot launched the same year — is now the most-used theological AI in the world. It retrieves from 30,000+ Church docs and cites every source. The Gita has 700 verses and the commentaries are public domain. Any of the five could've built this. None did.
Full teardown: https://wisdomquotes.in/blogs/rise-and-failure-of-gitagpt
Hi all I'm the developer of Wisdom, a free site for reading the Bhagavad Gita (https://www.wisdomquotes.in/). Sharing this here because it's specifically useful for recitation practice, not just another "check out my app" post.
One thing that always slowed me down when trying to learn shlokas properly was not knowing exactly where one word ends and the next begins when listening to a recitation, especially with sandhi and longer compound words. So I added word-by-word highlighting synced to the audio: as each shloka is recited, the word being spoken lights up in real time, for every verse across all 18 chapters.
The recitation audio itself is generated using https://prathosh.in/vagdhenu/, an open-source Sanskrit chant TTS model built by https://x.com/prathoshap. Genuinely impressive work, it's the first TTS I've heard that actually captures chant cadence instead of sounding like a robot reading text. All credit for that piece belongs to them; I've written up the full credits/technical details here: wisdomquotes.in/tts.
You can try it on any verse, e.g. chapter 2, verse 47 (कर्मण्येवाधिकारस्ते). Hit play and watch the words highlight as it recites.
It's free, no login needed. Would love feedback from people who actually chant regularly, especially if the pacing/highlighting timing feels off anywhere, since that's the part I most want to get right.
Namaste everyone 🙏
I run wisdomquotes.in — a small corner of the internet where I share verses, reflections, and daily wisdom from the Bhagavad Gita. Over the last while, talking to readers has made one thing very clear to me: people don't just want to read the Gita. They want to ask it things.
And honestly, that's how the Gita itself begins. Arjuna gets to interrupt. He gets to say "I still don't understand," push back, ask the same thing three different ways until it lands. Krishna meets him exactly where he is.
Most of us read the Gita the other way around — verse, commentary, try to bridge the gap ourselves. Beautiful in its own way, but I keep wondering what it would feel like to sit in Arjuna's seat for ten minutes.
So I'm exploring building something in that direction — a way to actually converse with the Gita's teachings, grounded in the real verses and traditional commentaries (not hallucinated spiritual fluff). Before I go deeper, I want to hear from people who actually love this text:
No question is too small or too "unspiritual." I'm as curious about "what does Krishna say about handling a toxic boss" as I am about "what is the nature of the Self." Both are real, both deserve an answer.
Drop whatever comes up. I'm reading every reply. 🪔
Namaste everyone 🙏
I run wisdomquotes.in — a small corner of the internet where I share verses, reflections, and daily wisdom from the Bhagavad Gita. Over the last while, talking to readers has made one thing very clear to me: people don't just want to read the Gita. They want to ask it things.
And honestly, that's how the Gita itself begins. Arjuna gets to interrupt. He gets to say "I still don't understand," push back, ask the same thing three different ways until it lands. Krishna meets him exactly where he is.
Most of us read the Gita the other way around — verse, commentary, try to bridge the gap ourselves. Beautiful in its own way, but I keep wondering what it would feel like to sit in Arjuna's seat for ten minutes.
So I'm exploring building something in that direction — a way to actually converse with the Gita's teachings, grounded in the real verses and traditional commentaries (not hallucinated spiritual fluff). Before I go deeper, I want to hear from people who actually love this text:
No question is too small or too "unspiritual." I'm as curious about "what does Krishna say about handling a toxic boss" as I am about "what is the nature of the Self." Both are real, both deserve an answer.
Drop whatever comes up. I'm reading every reply. 🪔
Valmiki says human actions are influenced by external factors and hence not driven solely by free will.
Similar thought process is also propounded by Sri Krishna when he says that any act which done depends on the actor, what the action is, why is it being done and then other factors which he calls “Daiva”.
I built a gamified Hindu philosophy app for people who grew up hearing Sanskrit at home but never really felt it – would love your feedback [iOS]
Most philosophy apps I've seen either go too academic (wall of Sanskrit) or too surface (generic mindfulness that could've come from anywhere). I wanted to build something for people who have passive familiarity with this tradition — heard it at home, at temple — but never had a way to actually internalize it as lived concepts.
So I built Wisdom.
What it does: You pick how you're feeling right now — stuck, anxious, lost, empty, alone — and the app routes you into one of three paths drawn from the Bhagavad Gita:
Each day is a single quote, a short reflection, and silent depth points that accumulate over time. As you go deeper, Sanskrit starts fading in alongside the English — not as a quiz, not behind a paywall, but as a reward for showing up.
What makes it different:
Solo dev, real passion project. Would love feedback from anyone this speaks to.
App Store link: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/wisdom-app-quotes-widget/id6747684125
Hey everyone,
I’m building an iOS app called Wisdom — a simple app that brings short, practical insights from the Bhagavad Gita and other Hindu wisdom texts into a daily reflection habit.
The idea is not just “quote of the day.”
I’m trying to make it feel like:
Read a verse → understand what it means for modern life → reflect for 30 seconds → build a small daily practice.
The app has:
I’d love feedback on:
Link: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/wisdom-app-quotes-widget/id6747684125
This is quintessential Tulsidas where he serves a deep philosophical claim rooted in the Gita as well but weaves it so poetically with a narrative in his story.
The heads of ravan become a metaphor for desires and Sri Ram symbolises the awakened consciousness. It strikes down one desire and another rises.
तुलसीदास excels in explaining deep concepts using everyday metaphors from his story.
I find this very beauitful 🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾
Genuine question, not rhetorical.
I've noticed that a lot of NRIs I know, including myself, have a complicated relationship with texts like the Gita. We grew up around them, we know they contain something valuable, and every few years something in life makes us want to go back to them.
But the versions available are either too academic, too religious in framing, or so dense that you need a guide just to know where to start. And the modern summaries often strip out everything that made the original worth reading.
So the question is honest: if there was a way to access these texts in plain, grounded language, one idea at a time, would you actually use it daily? Or is this one of those things that sounds good in theory but doesn't fit into how we actually live now?
Curious what the experience has been for people here.
Very interesting and pragmatic observation in Katha Upanishad
Most people assume there's one "right" way to practice spirituality.
Krishna disagrees.
In the Bhagavad Gita, he lays out three distinct paths — not because one is better than the others, but because seekers are built differently.
Jnana Yoga — for the seeker who needs to understand. Who can't surrender until they've dissected the truth from every angle. Knowledge is their doorway.
Bhakti Yoga — for the seeker who feels their way to the divine. Devotion, love, surrender. The heart leads, the mind follows.
Karma Yoga — for the seeker who can't sit still. Who finds God through action. Krishna's instruction: do your duty completely, but let go of the result.
Three paths. One destination.
The question Krishna is really asking Arjuna — and us — is: who are you, and how do you actually move toward truth?
Which path feels most like yours?
Most people assume there's one "right" way to practice spirituality.
Krishna disagrees.
In the Bhagavad Gita, he lays out three distinct paths — not because one is better than the others, but because seekers are built differently.
Jnana Yoga — for the seeker who needs to understand. Who can't surrender until they've dissected the truth from every angle. Knowledge is their doorway.
Bhakti Yoga — for the seeker who feels their way to the divine. Devotion, love, surrender. The heart leads, the mind follows.
Karma Yoga — for the seeker who can't sit still. Who finds God through action. Krishna's instruction: do your duty completely, but let go of the result.
Three paths. One destination.
The question Krishna is really asking Arjuna — and us — is: who are you, and how do you actually move toward truth?
Full breakdown here: 👉 https://www.wisdomquotes.in/blogs/krishna-three-paths-bhagavad-gita
Which path feels most like yours?
Most people assume there's one "right" way to practice spirituality.
Krishna disagrees.
In the Bhagavad Gita, he lays out three distinct paths — not because one is better than the others, but because seekers are built differently.
Jnana Yoga — for the seeker who needs to understand. Who can't surrender until they've dissected the truth from every angle. Knowledge is their doorway.
Bhakti Yoga — for the seeker who feels their way to the divine. Devotion, love, surrender. The heart leads, the mind follows.
Karma Yoga — for the seeker who can't sit still. Who finds God through action. Krishna's instruction: do your duty completely, but let go of the result.
Three paths. One destination.
The question Krishna is really asking Arjuna — and us — is: who are you, and how do you actually move toward truth?
Full breakdown here: 👉 https://www.wisdomquotes.in/blogs/krishna-three-paths-bhagavad-gita
Which path feels most like yours?
Most people assume there's one "right" way to practice spirituality.
Krishna disagrees.
In the Bhagavad Gita, he lays out three distinct paths — not because one is better than the others, but because seekers are built differently.
Jnana Yoga — for the seeker who needs to understand. Who can't surrender until they've dissected the truth from every angle. Knowledge is their doorway.
Bhakti Yoga — for the seeker who feels their way to the divine. Devotion, love, surrender. The heart leads, the mind follows.
Karma Yoga — for the seeker who can't sit still. Who finds God through action. Krishna's instruction: do your duty completely, but let go of the result.
Three paths. One destination.
The question Krishna is really asking Arjuna — and us — is: who are you, and how do you actually move toward truth?
Full breakdown here: 👉 https://www.wisdomquotes.in/blogs/krishna-three-paths-bhagavad-gita
Which path feels most like yours?
I'm a data scientist building a scripture app. The pipeline ended up processing the full shloka corpus of the Ashtavakra Gita (298 verses), Avadhuta Gita (271), Ram Gita (62), and several others. Tagging and scoring them for non-duality, witness-consciousness, and liberation themes surfaced something worth sharing: these three texts all point to the witness-self, but the entry point is different in each.
Ashtavakra works by systematic negation of identity — caste, life-stage, sensory experience, all stripped away. What's left is described as formless, unattached, the witness of the universe. The verse is na tvaṃ viprādiko varṇo... viśvasākṣī sukhī bhava — "knowing this, be happy." Happiness not as goal but as the natural state of the witness recognizing itself. The scoring on pure awareness and non-attachment tags was the highest of any text in the corpus.
Avadhuta doesn't argue toward the witness — it speaks as the witness already established. The structural pattern in the data is clear: negation of what he is not (fate, mind, ego), then a refrain about being "gyanamritam, steady as the sky." It reads like the Ashtavakra conclusion without the buildup. Different tool for a different stage of practice.
Ram Gita takes the most analytical route — distinguishing the jiva (consciousness reflected in intellect born from avidya) from atman (the witness, separate from intellect and beyond its distinctions). Closest to traditional Advaita scaffolding. Most useful for someone who needs the conceptual map before the direct pointing.
Full writeup with the top-scoring verses from all 7 Gitas: https://www.wisdomquotes.in/blogs/beyond-bhagavad-gita-quotes-mental-spiritual-health
For those working with these texts in practice: which entry point has been most useful — the systematic negation of Ashtavakra, the first-person declaration of Avadhuta, or the analytical framework of the Ram Gita?
Building the Wisdom app meant running a data pipeline across a lot of scripture — not just the 700 verses of the Bhagavad Gita but hundreds more from texts most people have never opened: Ashtavakra Gita, Avadhuta Gita, Ram Gita, Hans Gita, Shakti Gita, Shambhu Gita, Vishnu Gita.
After tagging every verse for themes like equanimity, non-attachment, fear, suffering, and witness-consciousness, some patterns became hard to ignore. A few things that surfaced:
Wrote it all up with Sanskrit, translation, and what each verse actually says practically: https://www.wisdomquotes.in/blogs/beyond-bhagavad-gita-quotes-mental-spiritual-health
Curious whether anyone here has worked with any of these texts — which ones and what's been useful.