Our scriptures state that everything which happens jn the world is God's will. Then why doesn't he stop wars? Why is God causing so much misery in Ukraine, Sudan, Myanmar etc... Why is God doing this? If we are God's children, then why is God causing wars? What is God's plan? Please tell me everyone...
I think 99 percent of the people don't acknowledge what Swamiji really intended, what he meant, and why he lived for. Most of us know him as a great monk and saint and probably will know one or two if quotes that's it. I was too but recently reading upon made me realise how much he is needed for today's world. He lived the path of religion, at his intelligence and pursuit he might have been one of the greatest science,medical field pioneers, but he choose the path of universality. He undoubtedly is Siva in the form of a Monk wandering around the world and preaching not only Hinduism and his master's works, he taught Christianity for true Christians, Islam for true Muslims. He was what he called his master Thakur saab " A true teacher is one who can be 1000 humans" he should be able to fit in all shoes and be comfortable teaching all. He never said my religion is true, he said all is one and all paths should be true. He was a Hindu personally but never converted anyone that's the master. He is Ramakrishna who appealed to everyone in even broader means. He saw Dēvi in women and They saw Siva in him (mogger Swamiji). He was modest in all ways. He was like the child of Ramakrishna which we call Kāli. I plead to read his works as they are most important today. And I've not even scratched surface till now. I bow down to the Super Saint who came and taught the world his absoluteness of universality..
Really wanna know you guys pov
Look at the billions of people on earth, the ones who are born into war or famine. It is very unlikely you'll ever get things this good again.
Everyone should be striving to break free from reincarnation.
The story of Prahlada being thrown from a mountain comes from later retellings of his persecution by his father, Hiranyakashipu.
After Prahlada became an unwavering devotee of Vishnu, Hiranyakashipu was enraged because he wanted everyone to worship him instead. He tried repeatedly to kill his own son.
One of those attempts was to have Prahlada thrown from the top of a steep mountain. Soldiers carried the young prince to the summit and pushed him off the cliff, expecting him to die.
As Prahlada fell, he did not panic. He simply kept chanting the name of Vishnu with complete faith. By Vishnu's grace, he landed safely—either being gently supported by the Earth or miraculously protected, depending on the version of the story. He emerged completely unharmed.
This was only one of many failed attempts on Prahlada's life. Hiranyakashipu also tried to have him:
Trampled by elephants.
Bitten by venomous snakes.
Poisoned.
Burned in fire (the famous story involving Holika).
Drowned and attacked with weapons.
I don't intend to be disrespectful or be demeaning, tho I want to know on if this scene from the Mahabharata with Kunti and Surya can be considered as righteous or if it's supposed to be an allegory.
Chapter 304
Verse 3
>एवं संचिन्तयन्ती सा ददर्शर्तुं यदृच्छया। वीडिता साभवद् बाला कन्याभावे रजस्वला॥
>And as she was thinking in this way, she suddenly perceived indications of the approach of her season. And her season having arrived, while she was yet unmarried, she blushed in shame.
So Kunti had her first menstruation from this verse and she's presumably around 12 years old.
Then after Surya is summoned, he is under the control of Kunti, as said by him and also by Durvasa:
Verse 11
>आगतोऽस्मि वशं भद्रे तव मन्त्रबलात्कृतः। किं करोमि वशो राज्ञि ब्रूहि कर्ता तदस्मि ते॥
>O Gentle lady, over-powered by the mantras, I come hither obedient to thee. Subject as I am to thy power, what shall I do, O queen? Tell me, for I shall do whatever thou mayst command?
Previous Chapter:
>ब्राह्मण उवाच
>यदि नेच्छसि भद्रे त्वं वरं मत्तः शुचिस्मिते
>इमं मन्त्रं गृहाण त्वमाह्वानाय दिवौकसाम्
>यं यं देवं त्वमेतेन मन्त्रेणावाहयिष्यसि
>तेन तेन वशे भद्रे स्थातव्यं ते भविष्यति
>अकामो वा सकामो वा न स नैष्यति ते वशम्
>विबुधो मन्त्रसंशान्तो वाक्ये भृत्य इवानतः
>The Brahmana thereupon said, 'If, O gentle maid, thou dost not, O thou of sweet smiles, wish to obtain boons from me, do thou then take this mantra from me for invoking the celestials! Any one amongst the celestials whom thou mayst invoke by uttering this mantra, will appear before thee and be under thy power. Willing or not, by virtue of this mantra, that deity in gentle guise, and assuming the obedient attitude of slave, will become subject to thy power!'"
Did Durvasa inform Kunti on the effects of this mantra being to bear a child? Its not written but he must've right?
Verse 12
>कुन्त्युवाच गम्यतां भगवंस्तत्र यत एवागतो ह्यसि। कौतूहलात् समाहूतः प्रसीद भगवन्निति॥
>Kunti said: O god, go to that place from which you have come. It is through curiosity that you have been invoked. O worshipful one, pardon me (for my folly).
Moving on Kunti repeatedly asks Surya to leave and even rejects his insistence on bearing a son.
Verse 20
>सा तान् दृष्ट्वा वीडमानेव बाला सूर्यं देवी वचनं प्राह भीता। गच्छ त्वं वै गोपते स्वं विमानं कन्याभावाद् दुःख एवापचारः॥
>Beholding them, the maiden was covered with shame. And being alarmed, the damsel spoke these words to Surya “O lord of rays, go to your own place. This outrage on your part is greatly distressing to me as I am a maiden.
This is after Kunti witnessed all other Devas who were looking at them at that time.
Verse 14-15
>तवाभिसंधिः सुभगे सूर्यात् पुत्रो भवेदिति। वीर्येणाप्रतिमो लोके कवची कुण्डलीति च॥
>O fortunate damsel, your desire is to have from Surya a son, of unrivalled prowess in the world and furnished with a coat-of-mail and ear-rings.
>सा त्वमात्मप्रदानं वै कुरुष्व गजगामिनि। उत्पत्स्यति हि पुत्रस्ते यथासंकल्पमङ्गने॥
>O maiden, endued with the gait of an elephant, surrender yourself to me. O damsel, you will then, have a son as you desire.
This is what Surya insists on despite Kunti not wanting to bear a son.
Verse 16-17
>अथ गच्छाम्यहं भद्रे त्वया संगम्य सुस्मिते। यदि त्वं वचनं नाद्य करिष्यसि मम प्रियम्॥ शपिष्ये त्वामहं क्रुद्धो ब्राह्मणं पितरं च ते। त्वत्कृते तान् प्रधक्ष्यामि सर्वानपि न संशयः॥
>O damsel of sweet siniles, I will go away after having enjoyed you. If you today do not comply with my words and gratify my desire, I will angrily curse you, that Brahmana and your father also. And I will undoubtedly consume them all for your fault.
>पितरं चैव ते मूढं यो न वेत्ति तवानयम्। तस्य च ब्राह्मणस्याद्य योऽसौ मन्त्रमदात् तव॥
>I will severely chastise both your stupid father who is unaware of this offence on your part and that Brahmana who, without knowing your character and manners has imparted the mantras to you.
This is Surya coercing Kunti.
Surya is powerless and subject to Kunti's commands and as she wished, he should've left but still insists on begeting her a son. Tho he cannot refute her commands, he still managed to control her by the threat of cursing her and also implicating her father and durvasa.
Verse 24-25
>न चापि गन्तुं युक्तं हि मया मिथ्याकृतेन वै। असमेत्य त्वया भीरु मन्त्राहूतेन भाविनि॥
>O timid girl, when you have invoked me by the help of the mantras, I should not go away in vain without enjoying you.
>गमिष्याम्यनवद्याङ्गि लोके समवहास्यताम्। सर्वेषां विबुधानां च वक्तव्यः स्यां तथा शुभे॥
>If, O damsel of faultless proportions, I go away (thus), I shall be the laughing stock of the whole world and an object of ridicule with the celestials.
This is Surya's reasoning on why he wouldn't leave without giving her a son, tho as per the mantra he is supposed to follow Kunti's words.
See even if Surya was absolutely compelled to give Kunti a son, as she is an unwilling maiden he should've left. But he's not forced to give her a son.
Even Krishna was ready to break vows to uphold Dharma so even if the boon forced him to give a son why couldn't Surya reject? Still he is not forced by the boon but insists on it himself. Tho his reasoning is that once a Deva is summoned, it is not proper to send him away in vain. His other reasoning was that he would face ridicule from other Devas.
So are Surya's actions actually considered Dharmic or is there allegory here? Even Durvasa seems irresponsible for not making it clear on the powers of the mantra and giving it to a young girl.
When I see Lakshmi-Narayana together, I do not merely see the Lord and His consort. I see the promise that Narayan watches over every step I take, while Lakshmi fills my heart with hope when I feel empty. Together they remind me that the greatest wealth is not what I possess, but the certainty that I am always under Their gaze.I painted this scene, I wanted to express a comforting thought that the universe is never left unattended.
I think I just found one of the best explanations of enlightenment I've ever read.
Seriously.
I wasn't expecting much... but this chapter completely surprised me.
It's one of those rare things that makes you stop reading for a minute because you realize you've been looking at the whole topic from the wrong angle.
I had to share this page because I have a feeling it's going to make a lot of people rethink what enlightenment actually is.
Read it when you have a few minutes. I'm genuinely curious if it hits you the way it hit me.
I made a serious bad mistake and also got my karma or the consequences as well quite quickly,
Though the situation could escalate even further but thanks to Krishna grace o was saved. But I’ve learnt a huge lesson out of this.
Long story short this mistake also could potentially ruin my dreams, it’s not against anyone or harm to someone but I hope Krishna stays with me, or he will continue to stay with me even with those mistakes that they definitely learn the consequences of it and not enough to just ruin everything
Can We Find a Common Spiritual Identity Beyond Sectarian Divisions? — A Personal Reflection from a 17-Year-Old
Namaste everyone. 🕉️🙏 ( Please read full post and understand my main point)
Before I begin, I want to make a few things very clear.
This is not a criticism of Vaishnavism, Shaivism, Shaktism, Smartism, or any other sampradaya.
This is not an attempt to say that one tradition is right and another is wrong.
This is not a scholarly article or a theological argument.
This is simply my personal philosophy, personal observation, and sincere hope for the future of Sanatan Dharma.
I am only 17 years old. I have no money, no influence, no political power, no famous background, and no connections with respected organizations, gurus, or religious institutions. I am just an ordinary person who loves Sanatan Dharma very deeply.
My English is not very good, so I used AI to help me organize and translate my thoughts more clearly. However, every idea written here comes from my own heart.
I request everyone to please read this patiently and with an open mind.
---
First, I Respect Every Sampradaya
Sanatan Dharma is incredibly beautiful because it contains many traditions that have flourished for centuries.
Vaishnavism.
Shaivism.
Shaktism.
Smartism.
Ganapatya.
Saura.
And many more.
Each has its own scriptures, acharyas, philosophies, methods of worship, and spiritual experiences.
I genuinely respect every one of them.
I am not asking anyone to abandon their sampradaya.
If you are a Vaishnava, please remain a Vaishnava.
If you are a Shaiva, remain a Shaiva.
If you are a Shakta, remain a Shakta.
If you are a Smarta, remain a Smarta.
Continue loving your Ishta Devata exactly as your tradition teaches.
My question is not about changing traditions.
My question is about unity.
---
One Question Has Always Stayed in My Mind
For centuries, devotees have debated questions such as:
- Who is Supreme?
- Is Shiva greater than Vishnu?
- Is Vishnu greater than Shiva?
- Is one only a servant of another?
- Is one only an expansion or part of another?
- Which sampradaya is the highest?
I honestly do not know how these debates became so central throughout history.
I am not making any historical claim.
It is simply a question that often comes to my mind.
Regardless of how these debates began, I wonder whether today we can think a little differently.
---
Who Are We to Decide the Greatness of God?
This is the question that touches my heart the most.
Who are we to finally declare which form of the Divine is greater than another?
We are ordinary human beings.
Our understanding is limited.
Even among the greatest rishis, philosophers, and acharyas there have been different interpretations throughout history.
If such great souls understood the Divine in different ways, perhaps we should approach these questions with humility instead of hostility.
---
One Thought Always Comes to My Mind
Whenever I see debates where devotees become angry over whether Shiva or Vishnu is Supreme, I ask myself one simple question.
If Shiva and Vishnu themselves were truly fighting over who is greater... would this universe even exist?
Would creation continue?
Would nature remain balanced?
Would cosmic order survive?
Would consciousness and existence continue peacefully?
Or would everything collapse into conflict?
Yet what do we actually see?
The sun rises.
The rivers flow.
Life continues.
The universe remains beautifully ordered.
Creation continues every single moment.
To me, this suggests something beautiful.
Perhaps the Divine itself is not divided in the way we sometimes divide ourselves.
If the Divine is not fighting...
Why should the devotees fight?
---
Another Question I Often Ask Myself
Can a Vaishnava never respectfully bow before Shiva?
Can a Shaiva never respectfully bow before Vishnu?
Can a Shakta not respect Krishna?
Can a devotee love their own Ishta Devata while also honoring another person's beloved deity?
Why should respecting one form require rejecting another?
Why should devotion become competition?
Can we not remain completely faithful to our own sampradaya while also recognizing the sacredness of every divine form?
I believe we can.
---
My Personal Idea: OMISHWARISM
I have often imagined a simple spiritual identity that belongs to everyone.
I personally call this idea OMISHWARISM (🕉️).
By this I do not mean creating a new religion.
I do not mean replacing Hinduism.
I do not mean replacing any sampradaya.
Rather, I imagine OM (🕉️) as the universal symbol of the one Supreme Reality that every path ultimately seeks in its own way.
To me, OM represents the eternal Paramatma, Parabrahman, Ishwar—the ultimate Consciousness and Existence from which everything manifests.
Consciousness and existence are inseparable, like two sides of the same coin.
Everything exists because of that ultimate Reality.
Everything returns to that Reality.
This is simply how I personally understand it.
---
What Would Change?
Honestly...
Very little.
Temples would remain.
Traditions would remain.
Festivals would remain.
Sampradayas would remain.
Acharyas would remain.
Ishta Devatas would remain.
Everything beautiful within Sanatan Dharma would remain exactly as it is.
The only thing I hope would slowly disappear is unnecessary hostility between devotees.
---
Unity Does Not Mean Uniformity
I am not asking for everyone to think exactly the same.
Sanatan Dharma has always contained many paths.
Different philosophies.
Different methods.
Different practices.
Different expressions of devotion.
That diversity is one of our greatest strengths.
Unity does not mean everyone becomes identical.
Unity means respecting one another while walking different paths toward Truth.
---
One Sanatan Dharma, Many Beautiful Paths
Sometimes I wonder...
Should Sanatan Dharma become divided into many competing "isms"?
Or can we remain one Dharma with many respected traditions?
I dream of one Sanatan Dharma that lovingly includes:
Vaishnavas.
Shaivas.
Shaktas.
Smartas.
Ganapatyas.
Sauras.
And every sincere seeker.
Not as rivals.
But as members of one spiritual family.
---
My Personal Observation
Sometimes I personally feel that when we spend too much energy arguing among ourselves, our unity becomes weaker.
This is only my personal observation.
I am not presenting it as historical fact.
Regardless of the past, I believe we always have the opportunity to choose greater unity in the present.
---
My Hope
I hope one day people can proudly say:
"I am a Vaishnava."
"I am a Shaiva."
"I am a Shakta."
"I am a Smarta."
" And Our is One Truth a Ishwar
"And I also deeply respect every other path within Sanatan Dharma."
I hope one day people stop asking,
"Who is greater?"
and instead ask,
"How can we grow closer to the Supreme Reality?"
Because perhaps that question brings us closer to Dharma than endless arguments ever could.
---
A Small Request
As I said earlier, I am only 17 years old.
I have no platform.
No influence.
No powerful connections.
No organization behind me.
If you believe these thoughts are worth discussing, I sincerely request you to share them with others and continue the conversation respectfully.
Even if you completely disagree with me, I would still love to hear your thoughts with mutual respect.
---
May Shiva bless us.
May Vishnu bless us.
May Devi bless us.
May Ganesha bless us.
May every form of the Divine guide us toward Truth.
And may OM (🕉️), the sacred symbol of the Supreme Reality, remind us that beyond all names, forms, philosophies, and traditions, we are all seekers of Truth.
Om Shanti. 🕉️🙏
Every temple and spiritual place has some form of aaradhana, aarti, devotional performance, music, dance, or sung prayer. Drum beating is among the most common expressions of this devotion. While this tradition is highly organised in many South Indian temples, it can sometimes lose its purpose and quality.
Kailasha Vadyam, which refers to the music of Kailash, the abode of Shiva, is an amalgamation of instrumental sounds designed to transform any atmosphere into an experiential Kailash.
Please ignore the text, I have not read and do not endorse the writing, my focus is purely on the picture itself.
What is the meaning of the arrows/heart looking symbols on the bottom, the ones that curl inward. I know I've seen them before elsewhere.
Additionally, is there any precedent to the flowing water engravings around the side? I have seen similar engravings on metal yoni, but I am unsure if it is a purely aesthetic choice, or if there is religious significance.
Thank you very much!
Its been happening for one month now. First I got extremely sad and lost out of nowhere, now the same is happening to my mother. We both are just morous and seem lost. In our house in one month almost 15-20 glass things have broken out of nowhere. My mom just opened the kitchen drawer one day and saw 4 big glass bowls broken along with their lids. Just right now, 4 cups just fell from a height and broke. Just before that, the vegetable drawer fell and broke a hinge. Never in my whole life have I see so many things broken at once.
Also since last month my mom first got sick, she had lower back pain. Then I got sick. Then I got a left eye stye - extremely painful. Then I got a right eye stye - even more painful. We both are just feeling extremely lost. We dont know why this is happening and we want this to stop. I have been bathing with salt water for 3 days now and we do wipe our house with salt water every alternative day. But nothing seems to be going right. Oh also, I have received no responses in the past 3 weeks from all the offers that landed for me (I am a freelancer). Like do I make sense? Its like something is blocking every bit of hope and happiness from touching us and I feel the glass is breaking to try and protect us. How do we resolve this! Really really need help!
My mom is a very devout person and we even have a big mandir at home, probably why something massive hasnt been able to touch us yet, but I keep having this lingering fear! Its only both of us and there is nobody else - please help with anything you might know that can resolve this! 🙏🏻
Namaste everyone,
I recently started a regular Vishnu Sahasranamam practice. I currently recite the Pūrvapīṭhikā and Dhyānam, then my birth Nakshatra section and the Phalaśruti, and I'm now planning to chant the entire Sahasranamam daily.
My question is purely from a traditional Hindu perspective: do any scriptures, commentaries, or sampradāyas mention changes in one's inner experience (including dreams, if at all) during Vishnu Sahasranamam sādhana? Or are such experiences generally considered incidental and not something to focus on?
I'd appreciate scriptural references or traditional teachings rather than personal interpretations. Hari Om.
last year, i went to Kashi with my mom n her parents, not my dad. some events happened and i was crying in the hotel room, my mom was right there, she didnt even care, she was sleeping worrylessly and so did her parents, they were seeing me but didnt care. But the moment i confronted my mom, her dad started opposing me.
The in dec, we went Vrindavan, my dad was also there. Same thing happened but not the scenario. Next morning, we walked out of vridnavana without seeing anything. Why does it happen? Is it because god wants me to be detached and cut my ego?
This article is : For Those Who Fear Being Their True Selves.
For the Rejected, the Misunderstood, and the Authentic
For the Heart That Refuses to Pretend
For Every Soul That Was Told to Stay Quiet
For the Silenced Voice and the Hidden Self
For Those Who Fear Being Their True Selves.
🕉️🕉️🕉️🕉️🕉️🕉️🕉️🕉️🕉️🕉️🕉️🕉️🕉️🕉️🕉️🕉️🕉️🕉️🕉️🕉️🕉️🕉️🕉️🕉️🕉️🕉️🕉️🕉️🕉️🕉️🕉️🕉️🕉️🕉️🕉️🕉️
The Outcaste Goddess, ruling speech, music, and inner wisdom. She is the Tantric Saraswati, but unlike the Vedic Saraswati who embodies purity and refinement, Matangi resides beyond convention, and control. the heavenly outcast who bestows blessings on people who live genuinely, express their inner truth, and embrace whatever that society deems unworthy, insufficient, or unattractive. (ft. Uchistha Chandalini form)
Matangi is the Goddess of inner and outer expression. She governs:
In tantric understanding, she is the power of sound (Nada) that bridges the formless into form. She blesses those who are ready to let truth flow through them especially artists, musicians, writers, and seekers who wish to live their Dharma without fear of rejection.
She is also the Goddess of marginal spaces. The forest, the outcaste, the rebel, the voice unheard. Her energy flows freely in those who dare to break norms to speak and live in authenticity.
Syamaladaṇḍakam, one of the finest compositions of great poet Kālidāsa, calls her as Syamala. Lalita Sahasranama (10) makes reference to Maa Syamala. Mata मरकर्श्यामा मार्ङ्गी मदशाक्षलनी॥ mata marakatasyama matangi madasalini || (verse 3 of Syamaladandakam) This means “Mother, who is dark as emerald (gemstone), who is the daughter of sage Matanga is rapturous.”
FORMS OF MAA MATANGI:
Note: Maa Matangi Sadhana must be done under someone who knows maa ( a sadhak or a guru).
She represents vaikhari (Vaikhari is the fourth and final form of sound in its evolution. This is the state wherein the sound is heard. This is called vaikharīibecause the sound is produced by a modified form of prana called vaikharī. This is the stage which is called aparā or non-supreme stage in the evolution of sound, where there exists fully developed materialization, combined with time and space, the components of maya.
[ 1) Para: The deepest level and Unmanifest sound. Pure consciousness before thought even starts.
Pashyanti: The "seen" sound Where intention and vision first form together Before words are created.
Madhyama: Mental Sound. Thoughts gets structured but still not expressed.
Vaikhari: The Final Outer expression. ]
It is said that will (iccha) forms the basis of speech to finally merge with consciousness. The other three stages of sound are para, pashyanti, and madhyama; the last one being vaikhari.
The important difference between Sarasvati and Matangi is that the former is related to materialistic and scriptural knowledge, whereas Matangi gives inner knowledge to know the Self. In other words, Matangi dissolves all dyads and triads, leading to the unveiling of maya. She also imparts the highest spiritual knowledge: "Nothing is good and nothing is bad," as Brahman is omnipresent. Since she is considered as Shyamala, she also controls all mantras.
She is Ucchiṣṭa, meaning “ritually impure” and therefore has very few rituals associated with Her. There are no qualifications required, in order to seek Her grace. All that She requires from the devotee is pure devotion and nothing else! In terms of symbolizing the intellect behind the entire creation and guaranteeing its continuation through the laws of karma, life, death, and reincarnation, among other things, she is none other than Śrī Lalitā Herself. She is the Creation's supreme ruler, and everyone must submit to her. She is the exact substance and content of all sentient beings as well as the insentient matter, energy, and cognition, and she never changes. She truly is the Parabrahman!
Mantrini, the Divine Mother, is the source of all mantras and their results. She can conjure anything, and she will never let her true devotees down. Sri Rajashyamala is the Divine Mother Sri Lalita's intellect, understanding, and all of her subtleties. Similarly, Varahi is the activity and implementation.
Sri Raja Matangi, also known as Sri Raja Shyamala, serves as the Chief Advisor (Mantrini) of Sri Lalita Tripurasundari. In traditional depictions, She is seated on the left side of Sri Lalita Devi, while Sri Varahi Devi is seated on Her right.
From the perspective of Kundalini Yoga, Sri Lalita represents the Sushumna Nadi, the central spiritual channel corresponding to the spinal cord. Raja Shyamala or Raja Matangi represents the Ida Nadi, the left subtle channel that runs alongside the spine. This channel connects to the left nostril and is linked with the right hemisphere of the brain, symbolizing creativity, artistic expression, intuitive wisdom, scientific understanding, and logical thought.
Sri Varahi represents the Pingala Nadi, the right subtle channel that also runs parallel to the spine. It connects to the right nostril and is associated with the left hemisphere of the brain, signifying action, movement, implementation, and all forms of physical activity.
In this way, Sri Raja Shyamala embodies intellect, wisdom, discernment, and subtle understanding, while Sri Varahi represents the power to act, execute, and manifest. Together, they complement Sri Lalita, the central divine force represented by the Sushumna Nadi.
Direction and Yantra
Direction : West (symbolizing fulfilment, maturity, and expression)
Yantra : The Matangi Yantra is used in practices for:
With sincere worship, Matangi grants:
She is particularly powerful for those who are spiritually gifted but socially silenced, she blesses the seeker with a fearless, dharmic voice, and guides them further into sadhana.
Matangi and Planetary Influence
Matangi governs the Sun (Surya). The planet of ego, authority, and expression. Her sadhana helps:
Matangi invites you to ask: Can you express the true song of your soul, even if the world doesn't approve?
Disclaimer:
Planets are part of creation, while the Mahavidyas are the cause of creation itself. Worshipping a Mahavidya doesn't just address a planetary problem, it connects the sādhaka to the primordial Shakti-intelligence from which the planetary force itself started.
Each Mahavidya is a complete expression of Śakti. They rules the entire cosmos. But like water finding a crack, her shakti flows most readily through the channel (nadī or graha) she is resonant with.
For Maa Matangi: the Sun is her fastest entry point - ability to attract everyone, develop creative and artistic abilities of the highest grade. Mastery over speech, logical deduction and all sciences and knowledge. These manifest quickly in sādhana. But her deeper work reorganizes the entire chart over time.
Worship Mahavidya whose assigned planet is afflicted in your chart to get the fastest, most visible result, but she is not confined there.
Jai Maa Uchistha Chandalini Jyestha Matangi 🦜🎶
I need to protect my apartment from my boyfriend’s schizophrenic mother that has been stalking us. She’s already stolen his motorcycle and I do not want her trying to break in or steal anything else. I just want her to stop stalking us. Any deity’s I can pray to or mantras I can listen to?