













1956 house inspection - Do I need to re-scope?
We are in home buying process and under contract (Upstate NY). We got sewer scope done and inspector suggest to re-scope after cleaning, as he was not confident to make any decisions (see text below). We are willing to pay for cleaning & re-scope; but our agent is saying that we are over-reacting. She also mentioned that any damage found after cleaning might become our liability, as seller might say that we damaged it while cleaning. Has anyone from the field heard of this type of liability issue?
We like this house & it has 72 feet line from house to city lateral. House has been vacant since last ~6yrs and seller has no idea when pipes were installed (it could be original). We are worried that if the pipe is damaged we will run into large repair bill (10-20K or more) fairly quickly. Are we overreacting?
Inspector wrote: "The main sewer line from the foundation to the city lateral contained excessive grease build up/debris. Portions of the sewer line appeared potentially compromised, delaminating with possible cracking and/or displacement observed in isolated sections. Visibility was limited during the inspection due to the buildup within the line. Recommend cleaning the sewer line and performing a follow-up sewer scope inspection to further evaluate the overall condition of the piping."
PS: We are pretty certain that inspector was not financially motivated, as he literally told me that he is too expensive for this type of re-scoping. He told me to find a good plumber who can do both: clean and tell us if condition is good.