I want lenslickers to tell me why this is acceptable behavior?

I want lenslickers to tell me why this is acceptable behavior?

This frauditor, in my opinion was instigating a fight by calling men and women names. Now I'm not condoning him being stabbed, although I'm not shedding any tears over him.

youtu.be
u/AdElegant7471 — 2 days ago

This lenslicker wants to prove to me that there are multiple wins by frauditors who's cases have gone to trial.

I'm making a new thread so you lenslickers can list the times frauditor's have prevailed at trial. Apparently this has occurred multiple times, so by all means show me what you have.

u/AdElegant7471 — 3 days ago

Shocking News: Lame Meyers violated probation 🙄

I'm genuinely impressed Lame made it this long without violating his probation.

youtu.be
u/AdElegant7471 — 6 days ago

Is this the end of frauditors?

It's a well known fact frauditors do this for one reason....money, take away the money, and there's absolutely no way these idiots will continue.

youtu.be
u/AdElegant7471 — 8 days ago

I just can't stop watching this...

This is a beautiful video that proves frauditors are indoctrinated clowns who don't understand the limits of the 1A. Que up lenslickers "it's ma rights"

youtu.be
u/AdElegant7471 — 10 days ago

The face of stupidity

My head hurt listening to LIAr prove how he knows absolutely NOTHING about our legal system. One would assume after multiple trials he would have at least a slight grasp on how things work, right? Nope, he doesn't have a flipping clue and it's hilarious to watch him prove his stupidity to the world 🤣

youtu.be
u/AdElegant7471 — 24 days ago

Wanabe Frauditard Arrested at a Florida DMV

Oh look....more indoctrinated frauditor script being used 🙄 this video has some zingers in it 🤣 where are all the lenslickers defending this illegal behavior 🤔

youtu.be
u/AdElegant7471 — 2 months ago

Frauditor's Trespassing Case: A Masterclass in Stupidity

This is a perfect example of frauditor indoctrination. She starts by using frauditor script "we're out here stress testing our first amendment rights." This totally incorrect in that the 1A is applicable between our government and Americans!!!NOT private corporations or other Americans vs frauditors. This is proof of frauditor indoctrination. They're repeating what other frauditor's say and pretending it's based upon the truth when clearly it is not.

youtu.be
u/AdElegant7471 — 2 months ago

Auditor Fails Basic Reading Comprehension & Gets TRESPASSED.

THIS IS PROOF OF FRAUDITOR INDOCTRINATION!! The US Post office is NOT a traditionally public forum!!! It's a place for people to do business with our government. This moron keeps saying "you're in public" NO YOU'RE NOT IN PUBLIC, frauditors and lenslickers will never understand the legal doctrine of the Public Forum Doctrine. It's literally frauditor kryptonite.

youtu.be
u/AdElegant7471 — 2 months ago

Frauditor Arrested in Fresno In Under Five Minutes

I want the lenslicker who runs this sub reddit to justify this video. Please explain what Constitutional rights we as Americans have of acting like this during a police investigation? Btw they weren't arrested for filming, they were arrested for interference and I would definitely say it was disorderly conduct (but they let the other frauditor's leave)

youtu.be
u/AdElegant7471 — 3 months ago

Cocky Gen Zer Talks Himself into Arrest

5 years ago I said that indoctrinated frauditor script would lead to people getting themselves in trouble. This video is proof that an entire generation of people use frauditor script as if it somehow helps them.

youtu.be
u/AdElegant7471 — 3 months ago
▲ 11 r/1A_Auditor_Summit+1 crossposts

About u/AdElegant7471 in regards to 1A Auditors

u/AdElegant7471’s core view is that frauditors and “nuisance streamers” are not protecting rights, they are abusing public recording for monetized conflict and creating the political/legal pressure for governments to restrict recording. They explicitly say people can already film outside, but that frauditors’ “if you don’t exercise rights you lose them” argument is wrong and that nuisance streamers may “force our government to take this freedom away” because the conduct is not peaceful and is done for money.

They also draw a distinction that is very useful for your summit: filming police from a reasonable distance without inserting yourself into the situation is “fine,” but harassment for monetized content is not civil liberties work.

Recurring legal themes

Their best recurring point is public forum doctrine. They repeatedly argue that government buildings, lobbies, and limited public forums are not the same as public sidewalks. In your LIA lobby recording discussion, they argued that a lobby can be open to the public while still having enforceable rules, and in another comment they asked auditors to explain what a “limited public forum” is.

They also like bright-line practical restrictions. For example, on buffer-zone laws, they argued that an actual legal distance rule can help because otherwise police determine the distance on scene. They cited Arizona and Florida in that context.

On Fourth Amendment issues, they emphasize the word “unreasonable” and argue that government can identify people for security purposes in certain contexts, using airports as an example.

Their view of auditors

They do not appear to believe there are “good” auditors. In one thread asking whether r/Frauditors approves of any 1A auditors, they said there is “not one single frauditor” they like and that they “hate them all equally.”

That said, their objection is not simply “camera bad.” Their more coherent objection is that auditors misuse civil-liberties language to justify harassment, escalation, legal misunderstanding, monetization, and bad tactics. That makes them useful in the same way PropForge or TheRealSaltyB can be useful: as a source of objections, not as someone likely to be persuaded.

Their style and temperament

They are less legally careful and more emotionally hostile. They use labels like “frauditor,” “lenslicker,” “indoctrinated,” and “script.” They also use personal insults and sometimes make comments about mental health, disability, physical condition, or criminality that are more ridicule than analysis. For example, in one visible comment they described someone as unable to care for himself because of “mental illness and autism,” and in another they made a personal comment about someone’s age and appearance.

Their own Reddit profile “About” line is blunt: “I HATE frauditors and turtleboy.” The profile page also showed roughly 4 years of Reddit age and activity in this space.

Constructive value

They are constructive when they stay on these points:

  • Public forum doctrine matters.
  • Open to the public does not mean unlimited filming.
  • Distance rules and scene control matter.
  • Police/security contexts can justify restrictions.
  • Auditors often misuse slogans instead of understanding law.
  • Harassment for monetized content is not civil liberties work.
  • Frauditors may create worse laws and worse case law for everyone.

They are not constructive when they drift into “I hate them all,” personal mockery, criminality generalizations, or “lenslicker” insults.

reddit.com
u/AdElegant7471 — 3 months ago

I just filmed the police in front of my house

I was working out front of my home when I looked up and saw two sheriff vehicles. I busted out my phone and recorded them talking to my neighbor. I was on my property and I didn't say a word. Amazingly I wasn't arrested or even noticed by the cops. How was that even possible? 🤣 According to frauditors all cops are tyrants who just randomly arrest frauditors for no reason 🤣 I'm still shocked the cops didn't notice me, arrest me, or have to put up police tape to keep me back 🤣

reddit.com
u/AdElegant7471 — 3 months ago