u/Additional-Nose6492

Dealer name: Angel Watches

Factory name: VSF

Model name (& version number): Rolex GMT-Master II 126710BLNR “Batgirl”

Price Paid: $473 + shipping

Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/HCz9EAj

Index alignment: Hour markers appear well aligned. However, I’d appreciate some keen eyes as the QC tool alignment isn’t perfect (most likely due to slight rotation and the shot not being 100% head on).

Dial Printing: Dial printing appears crisp and clean. Coronet, text spacing, and marker surrounds look good to my eye.

Date Wheel alignment/printing: Date appears centered within the window with good magnification. No obvious printing or alignment issues noted.

Hand Alignment: Hands appear properly aligned and proportioned. GMT hand stack looks correct.

Bezel: Bezel alignment appears good. Ceramic insert looks clean with consistent engraving and fill. No obvious speed bumps or alignment concerns visible.

Solid End Links (SELs): SEL fitment looks tight with no obvious gaps observed in the provided photos.

Timegrapher numbers: Looks good

Anything else you notice: Crystal appears clear with strong cyclops magnification. Rehaut engraving looks reasonably well aligned from the available angles. Jubilee bracelet and clasp appear well finished, and overall case proportions look good. I am not spotting any obvious QC concerns and am currently leaning GL. Would appreciate additional feedback from members familiar with VSF GMT-Master II models before proceeding. My first GMT purchase

Dealer name: JTime
Factory name: GF
Model name (& version number): Breitling SuperOcean Heritage II B20 Automatic 44mm Blue/Rose Gold
Price paid: $378 + $65 shipping
Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/SCE3xcV

Dealer name: JTime

Factory name: GF

Model name (& version number): Breitling SuperOcean Heritage II B20 Automatic 44mm Blue/Rose Gold

Price paid: $378 + $65 shipping

Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/SCE3xcV

Index alignment: Looks good overall, but I do have a slight concern with the 1 and 2 o’clock indices. They may appear marginally off compared to the rest of the dial, though it could be due to the angle of the photos. The 12 marker appears centered beneath the bezel triangle, and the 3, 6, and 9 markers look aligned. I'd appreciate additional opinions on the 1–2 o’clock area.

Dial Printing: Clean. Breitling logo, text and SuperOcean script appear crisp with no visible bleeding or defects.

Date Wheel alignment/printing: Date appears well centered overall. Slight variation between dates shown (3, 13, 25) but nothing that concerns me.

Hand Alignment: Looks good to my eye.

Bezel: Bezel triangle appears aligned with the 12 marker. Marker spacing looks consistent. No obvious rotation or alignment issues.

Solid End Links (SELs): N/A

Timegrapher numbers:
Rate: 0 s/day
Amplitude: 294–296°
Beat Error: 0.0–0.1 ms
Virtually excellent and comfortably within accepted QC ranges.

Anything else you notice:
Overall this looks like a strong sample. Case finishing appears clean, crystal seating looks even, and the rubber strap appears properly fitted. I don't see any obvious reasons to RL but would appreciate a second set of eyes from the community before I GL.

GF Breitling SuperOcean Heritage II B20 Automatic 44mm Blue/Rose Gold | JTime | First Breitling QC

Factory name: GF

Model name (& version number): Breitling SuperOcean Heritage II B20 Automatic 44mm Blue/Rose Gold

Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/SCE3xcV

Index alignment: Looks good overall, but I do have a slight concern with the 1 and 2 o’clock indices. They may appear marginally off compared to the rest of the dial, though it could be due to the angle of the photos. The 12 marker appears centered beneath the bezel triangle, and the 3, 6, and 9 markers look aligned. I'd appreciate additional opinions on the 1–2 o’clock area.

Dial Printing: Clean. Breitling logo, text and SuperOcean script appear crisp with no visible bleeding or defects.

Date Wheel alignment/printing: Date appears well centered overall. Slight variation between dates shown (3, 13, 25) but nothing that concerns me.

Hand Alignment: Looks good to my eye.

Bezel: Bezel triangle appears aligned with the 12 marker. Marker spacing looks consistent. No obvious rotation or alignment issues.

Solid End Links (SELs): N/A

Timegrapher numbers:
Rate: 0 s/day
Amplitude: 294–296°
Beat Error: 0.0–0.1 ms
Virtually excellent and comfortably within accepted QC ranges.

Anything else you notice:
Overall this looks like a strong sample. Case finishing appears clean, crystal seating looks even, and the rubber strap appears properly fitted. I don't see any obvious reasons to RL but would appreciate a second set of eyes from the community before I GL.