u/AffectionateGur7926

Disclosure: I work on VRAI's UAP evidence-control project. Sharing this here for the FOIA/public-records method angle, not for any UAP interpretation claim.

We ran a bounded comparison against candidate FBI Vault material and the strongest candidate matches did not survive manual review: 0 stable shared anchors, 0 next-pass recommendations, and 0 RIDS/eFOIA trigger rows.

That result is useful because it stops stronger public claims. It does not mean no match exists anywhere, and it does not mean newly declassified, less redacted, more complete, or missing from the Vault. It only means these bounded candidates were not good enough to support a novelty/redaction claim.

Evidence/data page with the public audit artifacts: https://virtualrealityaistudio.com/uap/data/

Original VRAIStudio note: https://www.reddit.com/r/VRAIStudio/comments/1th3yf3/a_negative_result_from_the_fbi_vault_comparison/

Playable Link:

https://virtualrealityaistudio.com/cosmic-horror/the-dunwich-compliance-review/

Platform:

Browser

Description:

The Dunwich Compliance Review is a free, unfinished browser beta from VRAI's cosmic-horror lane. It is built around institutional dread, procedural language, and a playtest loop where players can report bugs, clarity issues, controls, pacing, mobile layout problems, replay interest, and where they got stuck. The current page makes the beta status explicit: content, controls, visuals, audio, title, and availability may change. I am looking for practical playtest feedback, especially whether the embedded player loads, whether the Open Beta fallback works, and where the onboarding becomes confusing. Because this is horror, I am marking/tagging it NSFW per the subreddit rule.

Free to Play Status:

- [x] Free to play

- [ ] Demo/Key available

- [ ] Paid

Involvement:

I am posting for VRAI / the studio account and helping route feedback for this browser beta.