▲ 28 r/illustrativeDNA
u/Aggressive_Fly_4647 — 19 days ago
u/Aggressive_Fly_4647
Personal info:
>!Ethnicity: Kazakh!<
>!Tribe: Zhetiru (Kerderi)!<
>!Y-DNA: C-M86!<
>!mtDNA: F1b1!<
>!I look like a typical Kazakh with asian features lol!<
Reference list:
All SNPs? = YES
Bronze Age: Sintashta + BMAC + Siberia
Iron Age: BMAC + Siberia + Saka (eastern)
Medieval: Medieval Turkic are not that different from modern Kazakhs basically, which is why I do not need separate sources.
MONGOLIAN QUESTION:
Medieval: Mongol (post Genghis 1300 CE) + BMAC + Saka
Interpretation: The model BARELY passes with a 0.05 p-value (0.01 p-value and it fails), which means the Mongol sample CAN explain my eastern admixture, but the robustness is VERY LOW. I tried to force a Mongol sample to fit my data if you can see, but it requires Western admixture such as BMAC and Saka. The P-value is low because the Mongol sample cannot encompass all of Siberia. If I tested myself as a Mongol, it would fail miserably compared to Kimak or Chorni Klobuky, which have very solid results ALONE. Moreover, this Mongol is more west-shifted than modern ones.
Cross-test: Mongol (post Genghis 1300 CE) + BMAC + Saka + Siberia
Interpretation: I tried to separate Siberia and Mongol (eastern admixture before Genghis Khan and after) to see how qpAdm would accept/reject either of them. It looks like that Siberia EXPLAINS ALL EASTERN admixture, while Mongolic is hard rejected (post Genghis invasion 1300 CE). It means that there is no clearly distinguishable Mongolic admixture. Shortly speaking, the eastern admixture of Kazakhs is explained through ancient SIBERIAN admixture and not post-Ghengis Mongolic one.
u/Aggressive_Fly_4647 — 21 days ago