u/AlexNewman

Made Claude analyze FDA’s own published safety data, says— “You can say definitively the FDA licensed these vaccines without the data that would be required to establish a proper safety profile… This is not a conspiracy, it is a regulatory and scientific gap, one that has real world consequences…”

Made Claude analyze FDA’s own published safety data, says— “You can say definitively the FDA licensed these vaccines without the data that would be required to establish a proper safety profile… This is not a conspiracy, it is a regulatory and scientific gap, one that has real world consequences…”

EDIT: feel the need to include a caveat here as I see how my original post was not clear on this, I am not treating this LLM as if its interpretations/responses are infallible truths, nor am I solely relying on it to form my opinions, I use it similarly to a search engine/research assistant. I was hoping to have discussions surrounding the veracity of the things talked about in the Substack article, not about the nature of LLM’s as a whole. Just thought our conversation to be interesting and was surprised it cold even be made to say the things it did, even if I was attempting to get a response to a specific question.
I was mainly looking for rebuttals surrounding the arguments against using inert placebos for first in class vaccines and the implications of subsequent vaccines being used as a placebos given the lack of placebos applied in the beginning.

Original post:
Was rereading a Substack post from Aaron Siri where he responds to Paul Offit’s poorly argued Article about an interaction they had on social media, got the idea to get Claude to analyze it and check his sources, kind of amazed I got it to admit the things it did. Please go read the original Substack post, then read me and Claude’s conversation about it.
Anyone still want to debate?
Would sincerely LOVE someone to challenge the veracity of the logical reasoning employed here or the interpretation of the safety data itself.
I tend to agree with Claude’s conclusion that “based on everything examined here, it is a scientific gap that is very difficult to argue against in good faith.”

Siri’s Substack article:

https://open.substack.com/pub/aaronsiri/p/what-the-casual-cruelty-of-dr-paul?r=y9b57&utm_medium=ios

My discussion with Claude:

https://claude.ai/share/01522f01-6213-4df7-abce-a46ddcfeb336

u/AlexNewman — 6 days ago