u/Alternative_Fun_1390

I think Always Watching was into something

It should be clarified that I am fully aware of the film's reputation, not so much because it is bad, but because of how far removed it is from the concept of the original series. However, upon rewatching it, I realize that it maintains some of the narrative philosophies of the series, and I think it is very important to remember some of these because I believe they also apply to MH itself.

1- Operator Symbol.

Anyone who saw the Rant that Night Mind dedicated to the movie will know that one of the things he liked least was how the Operator symbol was handled. More than anything because it suddenly becomes a kind of personal signature of the Assassin instead of being more like something enigmatic. However, I must also remember that in the original series Alex was not the one who invented the Operator symbol; on the contrary, it was already present long before. Alex encountered him several times during the series before he even went crazy, and apart from that, we also saw him in the Rosswood series, which shows Alex without the Operator's influence for most of his life. This shows us that the symbol is much older than it seems; there are no historical levels, but yes, at least before everything that happened in the series, meaning Alex is only interpreting what he is finding. Even on some pages of the comic you can see how the trees form the operator's symbol, so it does seem to be something inherently tied to what could be the ark or the operator, but maybe it belongs to someone else, we don't know.

2- Source.

In the original series, it is mentioned that Alex believed he was the source of the entire infection; however, it is later revealed that Tim is the oldest infected person and that it is thanks to him that most of the series also became infected. While it is also debatable whether Alex was infected beforehand, given the recording of his birthday where the operator can already be seen, it is also important to point out that killing Tim would not have made any difference. No, not only because we know Alex was already insane by that point, but also because, using the reference film, it's shown that killing the Source serves absolutely no purpose. Milo thought that by committing suicide he would save his friends, and anyway, the Operator just possessed him as if nothing had happened, because the way to break free from the Operator's influence and the Ark isn't by destroying the Source, but by destroying an affected area—in this case...

3- Fire.

We know that one of the things that characterizes the ark is that it is wet; it is like a kind of huge lake or pond. Not only can we see Tim, from time to time, being transported to a gigantic body of water in the series, but also Hoodie, in the comics, being taken directly to the ark and having hallucinations inside this pond, but at the same time we are also given to understand that fire is a way of eliminating the influence that the ark put on an area. It's not for nothing that burning things is basically Alex's preferred way of getting rid of things, besides the fact that in the original series in the first season when Jake is in his apartment and it is shown that he has reached the point where he goes through a door and doesn't come out the other side or disappears in the middle of the night, his house is burned down shortly afterwards. We can also see this in the film, as the widow of the family manages to distance herself from the operator's influence, not by murdering her husband, but on the contrary by setting fire to her house, also suffering burn injuries herself, which effectively prevents the operator from having control over her, which is why she is still alive after so much time.

You could continue looking for connections such as the fact that the protagonists work on a news network, which could be connected to the series that the guys from Marble Hornets were making at the time, which is Clear Lakes 44. Or we could also show one of the many reasons why stopping recording Slenderman or the operator is stupid, because if you don't record you don't know what's happening (a thing that the movie portrayes very well with Milo's dog) Or even how several of the symptoms that the operator gives to Alex and Jay in the series also transfer to the film, such as irritability, lack of guilt, or the fact of obsessing compulsively about specific things.

But to make ir clear, I feel that those are the only things I can show that can really be carried over into the series because everything else feels more like tropes or just a form of self-reference.

u/Alternative_Fun_1390 — 5 days ago

As a longtime Little Nightmares fan, I've noticed that each new game alienates old fans.

When the first game came out, the most they had as a way to maintain a canon was the first game and the additional comics they released. Then they released the mobile video game, and people started mentioning that they were milking the franchise.

Then the second game came out, and the people who had come for the first one didn't return because many of the things they liked about the first game weren't in the second. Instead, new fans came, thanks to the second game. And these games also stuck around because of the things they introduced.

And now that Little Nightmares 3 and Real Animal have been released, a whole new pool of die-hard fans has arrived who are not only familiar with most of the established lore, but also have a good grasp of much of what had been said in the past. However, the old fans of both the first and second games hardly returned. Because what people liked about the first game and the second game are completely separate things, there hasn't been any kind of balance. The closest thing I've been able to find is the VR game, but that's just DLC for the second game at this point. And as I said, I've been around since the first game came out and I've seen this happen several times. There are many people who are very well-known in the fandom for the fan art and comics they've made, who suddenly disappear, or when asked if they'll return to the fandom after a new game is released, most answer no, because they don't like what they're seeing. This might sound harsh considering the infamous status Little Nightmares 3 has with the community, but as I said, this also happened when Little Nightmares 2 came out.

I posted this on Tumblr before and now I want the opinion of redditors... because why not?

reddit.com
u/Alternative_Fun_1390 — 5 days ago

You have to adapt the OG Surgist mythos. How would you do that?

I personally belive Morley Grove did a great job with it, but it's still only based on a few images, not the entire spectrum, and as a guy that didn't really like this incarnation of Slenderman, how would you use the OG Slenderman?

Note that what I mean by original myths is everything that excludes blogs and series like Marble Hornets or everymanHYBRID onwards.

Photos taken from the Nemesis Bloodryche video: What REALLY is the Slenderman?

u/Alternative_Fun_1390 — 9 days ago

Is anyone else tired of this discussion? Because I am.

I recently saw a chapter on PBS Digital Studios: Monstrum about King Kong, and OMG why is everything related to racism for those people?

I can understand the sexist claims, heck is one of those aspects of the movie that didn't aged well, but asuming the big ape represents people of other color... doesn't that looks WORSE?

u/Alternative_Fun_1390 — 11 days ago

Think about it, most of the additional content we've received has been pretty... well, I'd even say not outstanding, but quite decent. But many of the complaints people have about Little Nightmares 3 are hardly heard about the other products. Maybe it's because they're not as popular, or maybe not, I honestly don't know. But the truth is, everything exploded simply because the third game was mediocre—not good, not bad, just mediocre.

I say this because many of the complaints I've heard about the third game are things that could also be applied to other things that have also come out to promote the third game, and yet I've never heard those kinds of complaints about the comics, the podcast, or the virtual reality game. On the contrary, they are acclaimed.

I know this makes sense because the games are the main marketing aspect of the saga; everything else ends up being secondary. But beyond that, I also feel that many of the criticisms of the third game are completely unjustified, especially considering the fandom's reaction in other aspects. I mean, in many cases, people consume something and like it simply because it's fan service for the first and second games, so it doesn't seem fair to buy it and choose the best version just for that reason. I can accept everything else, like the repetitive gameplay or the poor narrative, but not continue the story from the previous games? Why?

reddit.com
u/Alternative_Fun_1390 — 16 days ago

Although I really like the third game and the story it tells as a sequel to the first, I have too much affection for the second game not to regret this decision, especially because I think this indirectly affected how the fourth game developed.

u/Alternative_Fun_1390 — 21 days ago