u/Amazing-Risk-9620

Way to communism is defined by Friedrich Engels as:-

1. Limitation of private property through progressive
   taxation, heavy inheritance taxes, abolition of inheritance
   through collateral lines (brothers, nephews, etc.), forced loans,
   and so forth.
2. Gradual expropriation of land owners, factory owners,
   railway and shipping magnates, partly through competition by
   state industry, partly directly through compensation in the
   form of bonds.
3. Confiscation of the possessions of all emigres and rebels
   against the majority of the people.
4. Organization of labour or employment of proletarians
   on publicly owned land, in factories and workshops, thereby
   putting an end to competition among the workers and compelling
   the factory owners, insofar as they still exist, to pay the
   same high wages as those paid by the state.
5. An equal obligation on all members of society to work
   until such time as private property has been completely
   abolished. Formation of industrial armies, especially for
   agriculture.
6. Centralization of the credit and monetary systems in
   the hands of the state through a national bank operating with
   state capital, and the suppression of all private banks and bankers.
7. Increase in the number of national factories, workshops,
   railways, and ships; bringing new lands into cultivation and
   improvement of land already under cultivation — all in the
   same proportion as the growth of the capital and labour force
   at the disposal of the nation.
8. Education of all children, from the moment they can
   leave their mothers’ care, in national establishments at national
   cost. Education and production together.
9. Construction on national lands, of great palaces as communal
   dwellings for associated groups of citizens engaged in
   both industry and agriculture, and combining in their way
   of life the advantages of urban and rural conditions while
   avoiding the one-sidedness and drawbacks of either.
10. The demolition of all unhealthy and jerry-built dwellings
    in urban districts.
11. Equal right of inheritance for children born in and out
    of wedlock.
12. Concentration of all means of transport in the hands
    of the nation.

Like the problem is shashi tharoor and all argue that those who wanted a nation based on religion moved to pakistan now the question is yes but hindus under rss were not goven any option why is a major question now to argue that those who wanted a seprate nation got it becomes flawed as no option was given to hindus. Like if you at that time were simply wanted to do so like gove the so called anti secular people a nation why was the same privilage not bestowed upon the hindus. Was the left too afraid of a vote of hindus?

True you may argue that there were elections in 46 but only 12 percent of populace could vote so was it democratic?

If a modern cult leader did 1% of this—policing teenagers' dreams, inspecting their toilets, refusing his wife medicine while taking it himself, and sleeping naked with his grand-nieces—we would call him a monster. Why does the label 'Mahatma' make these actions okay? I’m not saying he didn't help India get free, but let’s stop pretending he was a moral saint. He was a man with a massive ego who used the people around him as lab rats for his own psychological weirdness. He slept with them when they were 19 he was 77.

Bjp is a far right party and under shri Vajpayee jee it had right economic policies but it lost and has since then chnaged the economic policies in peer pressure acc to me. Is bjp doing this due to others doing so or bjp truely has economic leftist policies?

"It is our moral duty and our historical responsibility to dismantle the ideological edifice of sickly wokeism, until we have succeeded in rebuilding our historical cathedral, until we have ensured that the majority of Western countries once again embrace the ideas of liberty" Argentinian president at davos. I think it is true even in a non left country as left every where is same rotten to the core

"Even if the Muslims should go mad, we should not do the same... Even if the Muslims decide to wipe out the Hindu race, there is no point in Hindus getting angry with Muslims. Even if they slit our throats, we should be patient and accept death."

After all, who are the killers? They are our Muslim brethren, none other. Does a converting into another religion break the bond of brotherhood? ... [Even if they] killed our relatives, our people, why should we be angry with anyone?"

Is he father of india or paki

I got 168 marks thsi time and dint study maths 11th part and whole chemistry i need this much to get the 2 plus 2 program. If yes how,uch should i study

Today acc to me Arnab Goswami is the face of indian right wing, he has acc to me become the fox news of india and leads the crusade against the anti Hindu left media channels. Acc to me of bjp wins in Bengal which they will they owe a lot to him as he runs the republic Bangla too. What are some other people who you think are sympathetic to our cause.

Hello guys i am thinking of starting a podcast from indian right wing and need a cohost it will be abt like how bad left is and all.

About me i am a 17 year old kid and pro right centre right is my exact stance. I am a proud indian and bjp supporter.

Dm me if you want to join