
How is this "not permanent or distinct"?
The context is: Søvind is a small village, the info sign features local community events (current one on the poster advertises market days).
The posters that go on the sign are obviously not permanent, but the actual sign (AKA the nomination for review) is very visually bolted to the ground, as well as distinct in color and form, and it serves a purpose of drawing people together in the small community. So the rejection really threw me.
I'm curious to why someone would review like that, and even what I must assume is the majority of the reviewers who got this. I have no doubts about the validity of this nomination so I'm going to appeal it, I just think it's a waste of an appeal that could be used elsewhere.
Is there something I'm missing with this nomination?
Description reads: Søvinds informationstavle hvor man kan læse om hvad der rører sig i byen. (Translates roughly: Søvind's info board where you can read about what's happening in the town).