unpopular opinion: most people shouldn't be allowed to slaughter sheep.
try me
try me
Let's say someone worked the last 3 quarters at least 4/5. Unfortunately, One month or less in the middle of those 3 quarters, he had unemployment in order to transition to a new job. Is he still allowed to do flexijob ?
(his first job was a temporary contract)
Hello my southern neighbors...
I was wondering, I live close to the border between Belgium and France and I wanted to know,
from french people, if it is more expensive to hire someone outside of France or not ?
Because I'm looking for like a weekend-job to do, and I was looking at Francetravail but with not a lot of luck.
Is me, being from another EU country, a big issue for french businesses or not really ?
Thanks!
the title, basically, why don't we have a debt ceiling just like in germany ?
All parties, whomever is in power, are from now on obligated
to reach a lower debt. Once the debt ceiling is reached, you
cannot go above it anymore.
for example, we're now at 108% or so, so, all parties from now on, till 2035 or so,
are not allowed to increase debt until it's under X% of debt-to-gdb ratio.
what's stopping them to implement a debt ceiling for the future ?
So, in a previous post, i asked whether the social welfare system and its costs were sustainable. Clearly, the majority said that it was unfixable.
https://www.reddit.com/r/belgium/comments/1t6fnkp/so_did_we_fix_the_social_costs_yet_or_not
i was wondering, since i did do my tax returns, i once again saw this graph:
Do we know by how much the pensions are going to increase in, lets say, the coming 5,10, 20 years ? Also maybe the other costs, it would be interesting to see what the predictions are for the future for each item in this graph ?
How accurate are those predictions as well ?
anyone with an interesting source ?
Basically, there are more old people than young people,
and each year the imbalance becomes worse.
So, is there something that fixes this now ? I've heard that dewever stabilized some costs or something, but did it actually solve the increase in costs that demographics will cause in the future ?
If not, what would it take ? and why hasn't it been adopted yet ?
I was wondering, which mutualiteit would you choose if you're only concerned with
skin related issues. (i got a lot of acne scars on my back that i want to get resolved,
so i was wondering which mutualiteit would be best if we focus on this issue particularly.)
i mean from a financial point of view ofc, which would be optimal.
thanks
So i was philosphing, because i had nothing better to do.
farmers are complaining that prices are too low, because effectevily there but a few companies dominating the food processing industry, or whatever.
Also, EU/national regulation puts a bit of a pressure on what resources they can use. (think nitrogen/ amount of cows/m², pesticides, chickens/m², ... etc etc)
fine, EU/national goverment subsidies them such that they stay afloat.
my question is, why don't they force a minimum price on produce ?
there are already qoutas on imports before import taxes are levied, so
i can imagine that eventually, food producers must buy some food locally at a good price for farmers. (although i don't know how much the import tax is, nor if that would compensate for it)
so, farmers would be happy, governements would be happy (no need to subsidies?)
so, why not ?
please someone who knows more about this, enlighten my dumbass please