An agency perspective: The "blind spots" of independent matching on social media
Hi everyone,
I work with Ave Fertility, and I’ve been following a lot of discussions lately about Intended Parents (IPs) trying to find surrogates directly through Facebook groups or other social media channels. I completely understand the appeal — agency fees are incredibly high, and the wait times can be agonizing. Cutting out the middleman to save money and time makes total sense on paper.
But looking at this from the agency side, I often wonder if IPs truly realize the level of risk they are taking on when they bypass professional vetting.
We recently had a situation at Ave Fertility that really highlighted this for me. We were screening a candidate who actually passed the fertility clinic's initial medical approval. On paper, she looked like a great match.
However, because we use a strict 6-step qualification process, we dug much deeper. It turned out she:
Failed her psychological assessment due to underlying emotional readiness issues.
Was under severe financial distress (meaning she was likely pursuing surrogacy out of despair rather than a stable, willing place).
Hid critical information regarding a past egg retrieval.
If an ordinary IP had met her on Facebook, they likely would have relied on the clinic’s medical nod and moved forward, completely unaware of the psychological or financial red flags.
I’m not posting this to sell our services, but I am genuinely curious to hear from this community: How do independent IPs navigate these blind spots? If you went the independent route, how did you handle the deep background checks, financial vetting, and psychological screenings to ensure you felt completely secure about the future of your child? If you chose an agency, was a scenario like this the deciding factor?
Would love to hear your thoughts and experiences.