u/AwkwardText6261

Image 1 — Worse then the first one? VSF Submariner No Date
Image 2 — Worse then the first one? VSF Submariner No Date
Image 3 — Worse then the first one? VSF Submariner No Date
Image 4 — Worse then the first one? VSF Submariner No Date
Image 5 — Worse then the first one? VSF Submariner No Date
Image 6 — Worse then the first one? VSF Submariner No Date
Image 7 — Worse then the first one? VSF Submariner No Date
Image 8 — Worse then the first one? VSF Submariner No Date
Image 9 — Worse then the first one? VSF Submariner No Date
Image 10 — Worse then the first one? VSF Submariner No Date
Image 11 — Worse then the first one? VSF Submariner No Date
Image 12 — Worse then the first one? VSF Submariner No Date
Image 13 — Worse then the first one? VSF Submariner No Date
Image 14 — Worse then the first one? VSF Submariner No Date

Worse then the first one? VSF Submariner No Date

  1. ⁠Dealer name: Necoclock
  2. ⁠Factory name: VSF
  3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Submariner No Date 41mm 124060 904L Ceramic Black Dial SS Bracelet VSF VS3230
  4. ⁠Price Paid: $428
  5. ⁠Album Links: N/A
  6. ⁠Index alignment: 6 slightly off, maybe within tolerance?
  7. ⁠Dial Printing: looks good, clean, and crisp
  8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
  9. ⁠Hand Alignment: good
  10. ⁠Bezel: Pip looks centered, rest looks good
  11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): no noticeable gaps
  12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: Rate 0s/d, AMP 237, B.E 0.2ms, BEAT 28800
  13. ⁠Anything else you notice: Rolex stamp on the inner clasp. Looks like it’s not even there.

This is now my second one within 5 days from VSF. I’m not sure what’s going on but if it’s not one problem it’s the next. I understand they can’t be perfect but what the hell. The engraving is non existent. Looks like it’s half there. Let me know what you think please.

u/AwkwardText6261 — 6 days ago

VSF Submariner No Date 124060

  1. ⁠⁠Dealer name: Necoclock
  2. ⁠⁠Factory name: VSF
  3. ⁠⁠Model name (& version number): Submariner No Date 41mm 124060 904L Ceramic Black Dial SS Bracelet VSF VS3230
  4. ⁠⁠Price Paid: $428
  5. ⁠⁠Album Links: N/A
  6. ⁠⁠Index alignment: 6 slightly off, doesn’t look as bad with the QC tool as it does without it, but everything else looks good
  7. ⁠⁠Dial Printing: looks good, clean, and crisp
  8. ⁠⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
  9. ⁠⁠Hand Alignment: good
  10. ⁠⁠Bezel: Pip looks centered, rest looks good
  11. ⁠⁠Solid End Links (SELs): no noticeable gaps
  12. ⁠⁠Timegrapher numbers: Rate 0s/d, AMP 237, B.E 0.2ms, BEAT 28800
  13. ⁠⁠Anything else you notice: I do not notice anything else.

It looks great aside from that misalignment in the marker. Not sure if I can look past that because I noticed it right away lol Let me know what you guys think! Thank you

u/AwkwardText6261 — 9 days ago